Skip to content
Politics & Current Affairs

Where GOP Candidates Stand on Space

With Santorum, Romney and Paul taking the most votes in the Iowa Caucus, where do they stand on space exploration and the future of NASA? Will other candidates make space an issue?
Sign up for the Smarter Faster newsletter
A weekly newsletter featuring the biggest ideas from the smartest people

What’s the Latest Development?


The Iowa Caucuses have put three politicians on their collective pedestal: Santorum, Romney and Paul. So where do these candidates, and the rest of the GOP field, stand on space issues? Santorum’s niche is in conservative social issues so don’t expect too much from him. Romney, too, has been relatively quiet, content to criticize any plans for space exploration as too costly given the nation’s budget problems. Paul, ever-faithful to his small government vision, has rejected numerous federal attempts to fund NASA.

What’s the Big Idea?

Considered the idea man of the GOP field, Gingrich has been the most outspoken candidate on NASA and space exploration. He has been highly critical of NASA, calling it the archetypal wasteful bureaucracy and saying that if government money had been given to private space ventures instead, the US would already have a permanent moon colony. In the past, Gingrich has endorsed giving large cash prizes to encourage space innovation. After the space shuttles were retired, he said such a prize should be given for a new manned space vehicle.

Photo credit: shutterstock.com

Sign up for the Smarter Faster newsletter
A weekly newsletter featuring the biggest ideas from the smartest people

Related
The conservative conundrum regarding the Romney candidacy is the result of our plurality voting system that isn’t flexible enough to accurately measure voter preferences. While this system is adequate for a head-to-head race, it is deeply problematic when there are multiple candidates.
It’s plain to see that I’m an optimist, sometimes more than is socially comfortable. The ease with which I dismiss the disastrous economic decline above serves as one example of that. I wrote that the recession will benefit our political system, and, before I cut this line, as having “rewarded our company for methodical execution and ruthless efficiency by removing competitors from the landscape.” I make no mention of the disastrous effects on millions of people, and the great uncertainty that grips any well-briefed mind, because it truly doesn’t stand in the foreground of my mind (despite suffering personal loss of wealth). Our species is running towards a precipice with looming dangers like economic decline, political unrest, climate crisis, and more threatening to grip us as we jump off the edge, but my optimism is stronger now than ever before. On the other side of that looming gap are extraordinary breakthroughs in healthcare, communications technology, access to space, human productivity, artistic creation and literally hundreds of fields. With the right execution and a little bit of luck we’ll all live to see these breakthroughs — and members of my generation will live to see dramatically lengthened life-spans, exploration and colonization of space, and more opportunity than ever to work for passion instead of simply working for pay. Instead of taking this space to regale you with the many personal and focused changes I intend to make in 2009, let me rather encourage you to spend time this year thinking, as I’m going to, more about what we can do in 2009 to positively affect the future our culture will face in 2020, 2050, 3000 and beyond.

Up Next