The U.S. states hit hardest by the federal government shutdown

Not all states are feeling the effects equally.

  • A new map from WalletHub, generated by comparing various federal data, shows the states most affected by the government shutdown.
  • About 800,000 federal employees are furloughed or are working without pay.
  • Government shutdowns have become an increasingly common political tool, but it wasn't until the early 1980s that they started resulting in the closing of federal agencies.

Friday marked the 21st day of the federal government shutdown, tying the record with the longest-running one in American history.

As a partisan battle over border security funding continues to grip the capital, about 25 percent of the federal government has been closed down, and some 800,000 federal workers are furloughed or working without pay. Some federal agencies had already received funding prior to the shutdown and have remained open, including Defense, Education, Veterans Affairs, Energy, Labor, Health and Human Services, Legislative branch and the Bureau of Reclamation.

Meanwhile, others have closed their doors, including Agriculture, Commerce, Justice, Homeland Security, Housing and Urban Development, Interior, State, Transportation and Treasury.

As the shutdown approaches three full weeks in length, some parts of the country are getting hit harder than others. A new map from WalletHub — generated by comparing metrics like share of federal jobs, federal contract dollars per capita, share of families receiving food stamps, real estate as a percentage of gross state product, and access to national parks — shows these discrepancies in full.

Source: WalletHub

The data shows that:

  • Red states are hit slightly harder than blue states.
  • The District of Columbia, which employs about 20 percent of all federal employees, was hit the hardest.
  • Alaska and Hawaii were among the top five hardest-hit states.

Some federal employees continue working

Federal workers who hold jobs deemed essential to the public are required to continue working, even without paychecks, such as Secret Service agents, Transportation Security Agents, pilots, air-traffic controllers and Border Patrol agents. These workers, after all, are legally prohibited from going on strike thanks to the Taft-Hartley Act passed in 1947.

"My personal opinion is that it constitutes involuntary servitude," Eric Young, president of the union that represents the 30,000 employees of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, told The Atlantic.

Other federal workers are frustrated, too.

"Guess what happens this time of year — tuition bills. Property tax. Christmas credit cards," Carl Houtman, an engineer who works for the Forest Service told USA Today. He recently protested the shutdown outside of the White House. "This is absolutely the worst time of year to miss a paycheck," he added.

The origin and costs of government shutdowns

The federal government, or at least parts of it, shuts down when Congress fails to pass — or when the president refuses to sign — 12 so-called appropriation bills (or continuing resolutions) that lay out an annual budget for how government agencies will spend money in the next fiscal year.

Since 1974, the federal government has shut down 21 times. However, as Vox points out, it wasn't until Attorney General Benjamin Civiletti issued a set of opinions in 1980 and '81 that the government started treating "funding gaps" as necessitating the full or partial shutdown of government agencies. Now, government shutdowns cost the economy a lot of money.

For example, the financial ratings agency Standard & Poor's estimated that the 16-day government shutdown of 2013 cost a total $24 billion, or some $1.43 billion per day, due to decreased travel, hotel bookings, park visits and lost labor.

"The bottom line is the government shutdown has hurt the U.S. economy," Standard & Poor's said in statement from 2013.

The 4 types of thinking talents: Analytic, procedural, relational and innovative

Understanding thinking talents in yourself and others can build strong teams and help avoid burnout.

Big Think Edge
  • Learn to collaborate within a team and identify "thinking talent" surpluses – and shortages.
  • Angie McArthur teaches intelligent collaboration for Big Think Edge.
  • Subscribe to Big Think Edge before we launch on March 30 to get 20% off monthly and annual memberships.
Keep reading Show less

Jordan Peterson on Joe Rogan: The gender paradox and the importance of competition

The Canadian professor has been on the Joe Rogan Experience six times. There's a lot of material to discuss.

Personal Growth
  • Jordan Peterson has constantly been in the headlines for his ideas on gender over the last three years.
  • While on Joe Rogan's podcast, he explains his thoughts on the gender differences in society.
  • On another episode, Peterson discusses the development of character through competition.
Keep reading Show less

Horseshoe crabs are drained for their blue blood. That practice will soon be over.

The blood of horseshoe crabs is harvested on a massive scale in order to retrieve a cell critical to medical research. However, recent innovations might make this practice obsolete.

Credit: Business Insider (video)
Surprising Science
  • Horseshoe crabs' blue blood is so valuable that a quart of it can be sold for $15,000.
  • This is because it contains a molecule that is crucial to the medical research community.
  • Today, however, new innovations have resulted in a synthetic substitute that may end the practice of farming horseshoe crabs for their blood.
Keep reading Show less

Tech billionaires could end climate change. So why aren’t they?

David Wallace-Wells points out that the people who can save the world just aren't all that interested.

  • Saving the world from the apocalyptic impact of climate change should be a dream for many Silicon Valley titans concerned about legacy, says David Wallace-Wells, and yet few are dedicating themselves to addressing the catastrophe.
  • Negative emissions technology funded by Bill Gates exists. It would cost $3 trillion per year to operate and would mean human industry could continue at current levels without global warming.
  • That figure sounds astronomical, however global subsidies to fossil fuel industries cost $5 trillion per year.
Keep reading Show less