“Is signing a petition a public or private act?” asks the Los Angeles Times, discussing the context that gay rights advocates have sought to use petition signatures to expose their opponents. The issue begs a very fundamental question: If you’re prepared to put your name against a cause that is being petitioned, does that name and associated belief become public property? The debate stems from the fight over same-sex marriage in California and follows a Supreme Court ruling last week which voted to block publication of the names of the 138,000 or more people in Washington who signed petitions against the law that allows same-sex marriage. The Los Angeles Times asks: “Is signing a petition and delivering it to the government a public act, like voting on a bill in the legislature or contributing money to a campaign? Or is it more like casting a secret ballot at the polling place?”
MakeLoveNotPorn founder Cindy Gallop says women need to stop giving a damn what people think.
Nearly half of all stars are born in binary systems, with the most massive ones dying the fastest. It's not pretty for the "second" star.
Richard Dawkins is perhaps the world’s preeminent voice in one of our weightiest debates—‘how did we get here?’ So, how does the spearhead of modern atheism feel we are doing […]