from the world's big
Elizabeth Warren's plan to forgive student loan debt could lead to an economic boom
A plan to forgive almost a trillion dollars in debt would solve the student loan debt crisis, but can it work?
- Sen. Elizabeth Warren has just proposed a bold education reform plan that would forgive billions in student debt.
- The plan would forgive the debt held by more than 30 million Americans.
- The debt forgiveness program is one part of a larger program to make higher education more accessible.
Student loans are a leading cause of debt in the United States. Edging out credit cards for the number two spot, 45 million Americans are into their creditors for at least 1.5 trillion dollars' worth of student loan debt. This weighs down on the economy, as money that could be spent on starting businesses, buying homes, or paying for basic needs is instead spent on servicing debt.
These numbers make it easy to understand why people are so keen about ideas for universal tuition-free higher education, however, those plans would do little for those already drowning in student loan debt. Perhaps that is why Sen. Elizabeth Warren announced that her education plan would not only open up the colleges to all no matter what their ability to pay but also reduce the debt held by millions upon millions of Americans.
Elizabeth Warren’s Debt Free Jubilee
Warren, one of 19 Democrats currently running for president, has announced a bold education reform plan. It hits on many of the significant democratic talking points in proposing that the federal government step in and make two- and four-year undergraduate programs tuition free at public universities. But her policy differs from those of other Democrats in that she would also forgive the debt of many Americans who are already out of school.
Her policy proposal, laid out in detail in a Medium post, includes at least partial forgiveness for 95 percent of the Americans who have student debt. The plan would cancel up to 50,000 dollars in such debt for everyone with a household income up to 100,000 dollars a year.
She explained in her post how the benefit would slowly phase out after household income rises above that:
"The $50,000 cancellation amount phases out by $1 for every $3 in income above $100,000, so, for example, a person with household income of $130,000 gets $40,000 in cancellation, while a person with household income of $160,000 gets $30,000 in cancellation."
Americans making more than 250,000 dollars a year with student debt would get no relief under her program, but they do get to continue being in the 95th percentile of income. They'll probably be fine.
Debt owed to the government would be cancelled automatically using information Uncle Sam already has. Privately held loans would also be eligible for cancellation, though the government would have to work with the banks and creditors who hold that debt to arrange that relief.
How many people would benefit? Who are they?
Elizabeth Warren claims her plan would completely obliterate the debt held by 75 percent of those holding student loan debt and provide some form of relief for 95 percent of people with such debt. Some quick math shows us that this works out to be a direct boon to 42 million people. There are also considerations for low- income students who might have a hard time affording room and board even after tuition is abolished.
As higher education policy gets complicated when race gets involved, her plan also has considerations for Historically Black Universities and state-driven programs to help improve outcomes for low-income students and students of color.
What are experts saying about this?
An analysis carried out by Brandeis University predicted that there would be a positive economic result from her plan, as the sudden removal of such a tremendous debt burden from so many people would lead to "consumer-driven economic stimulus, improved credit scores, greater home-buying rates and housing stability, higher college completion rates, and greater business formation."
The proposal was similarly praised by Former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich on his Facebook page, where he said "Eliminating student debt would be a big boost for the economy. It would allow millions of young people to invest in things like buying a home or starting a business. Ensuring the next generation can compete in the global economy — without taking out crushing loans — is essential to rebuilding the American middle class."
On the right, criticism has been quick to materialize. Neal P. McCluskey, the director of the Center for Educational Freedom at the Cato Institute, told the New York Times that the plan would be unfair to taxpayers "who had no choice but to give them that money, on the terms the borrowers voluntarily agreed to."
One obvious pitfall does exist with her plan, similar to one that has plagued the Affordable Care Act. According to Vox's Ella Nilsen, the program would require states to accept the federal money to make their schools tuition-free. As the experience of trying to give states free money for health care shows us, some states will refuse to do so out of principle or spite.
What’s the thinking behind this?
Education is one of the best investments a country can make, paying back every dollar in investment in several dollars of new economic growth. Her reform plan not only helps people get out of debt and frees their cash for better use elsewhere but will allow others to go to college that might not have been able to otherwise, improving their lifetime earning potential.
Beyond this, Warren's plan calls for a fundamental rethinking of how Americans view higher education. While many Americans consider higher education an investment in their futures to be made worthwhile with higher earnings later, Warren's plan takes the view that a college education is every bit as necessary to both individuals and society in the 21st century as a high school education was in the 20th, and should be treated as such by the government.
What will it cost?
The debt forgiveness plan would cost Uncle Sam $640B up front, and the free college tuition plan would cost $1.25T over the next 10 years. Senator Warren has pointed out this could be paid for entirely with her Ultra-Millionaires tax that would levy a 2 percent surtax on all fortunes valued over $50M dollars with an additional 1 percent would be tacked on for every billion in wealth.
Of course, we must also ask what it will cost not to forgive the debt. Not only does the cost of college and the burden of debt cause young adults to struggle to make ends meet, but it is proven to reduce college graduation rates. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell said that the student loan debt crisis "absolutely could hold back economic growth."
Given these considerations, Warren's plan may turn out to be a wise investment.
The price of a college education in the United States has grown dramatically over the years. Many proposals have been put forward to solve the problem, but only one plan currently exists to forgive the debt of those who already finished school. If the United States will enact such a policy remains in question, but its proposal suggests that many Americans are ready for a new way of thinking about higher education.
Join multiple Tony and Emmy Award-winning actress Judith Light live on Big Think at 2 pm ET on Monday.
Construction of the $500 billion dollar tech city-state of the future is moving ahead.
- The futuristic megacity Neom is being built in Saudi Arabia.
- The city will be fully automated, leading in health, education and quality of life.
- It will feature an artificial moon, cloud seeding, robotic gladiators and flying taxis.
The Red Sea area where Neom will be built:
Saudi Arabia Plans Futuristic City, "Neom" (Full Promotional Video)<span style="display:block;position:relative;padding-top:56.25%;" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="c646d528d230c1bf66c75422bc4ccf6f"><iframe type="lazy-iframe" data-runner-src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/N53DzL3_BHA?rel=0" width="100%" height="auto" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;"></iframe></span>
Frequent shopping for single items adds to our carbon footprint.
- A new study shows e-commerce sites like Amazon leave larger greenhouse gas footprints than retail stores.
- Ordering online from retail stores has an even smaller footprint than going to the store yourself.
- Greening efforts by major e-commerce sites won't curb wasteful consumer habits. Consolidating online orders can make a difference.
A pile of recycled cardboard sits on the ground at Recology's Recycle Central on January 4, 2018 in San Francisco, California.
Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images<p>A large part of the reason is speed. In a competitive market, pure players use the equation, <em>speed + convenience</em>, to drive adoption. This is especially relevant to the "last mile" GHG footprint: the distance between the distribution center and the consumer.</p><p>Interestingly, the smallest GHG footprint occurs when you order directly from a physical store—even smaller than going there yourself. Pure players, such as Amazon, are the greatest offenders. Variables like geographic location matter; the team looked at shopping in the UK, the US, China, and the Netherlands. </p><p>Sadegh Shahmohammadi, a PhD student at the Netherlands' Radboud University and corresponding author of the paper, <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/26/tech/greenhouse-gas-emissions-retail/index.html" target="_blank">says</a> the above "pattern holds true in countries where people mostly drive. It really depends on the country and consumer behavior there."</p><p>The researchers write that this year-and-a-half long study pushes back on previous research that claims online shopping to be better in terms of GHG footprints.</p><p style="margin-left: 20px;">"They have, however, compared the GHG emissions per shopping event and did not consider the link between the retail channels and the basket size, which leads to a different conclusion than that of the current study."</p><p>Online retail is where convenience trumps environment: people tend to order one item at a time when shopping on pure player sites, whereas they stock up on multiple items when visiting a store. Consumers will sometimes order a number of separate items over the course of a week rather than making one trip to purchase everything they need. </p><p>While greening efforts by online retailers are important, until a shift in consumer attitude changes, the current carbon footprint will be a hard obstacle to overcome. Amazon is trying to have it both ways—carbon-free and convenience addicted—and the math isn't adding up. If you need to order things, do it online, but try to consolidate your purchases as much as possible.</p><p>--</p><p><em>Stay in touch with Derek on <a href="http://www.twitter.com/derekberes" target="_blank">Twitter</a>, <a href="https://www.facebook.com/DerekBeresdotcom" target="_blank">Facebook</a> and <a href="https://derekberes.substack.com/" target="_blank">Substack</a>. His next book is</em> "<em>Hero's Dose: The Case For Psychedelics in Ritual and Therapy."</em></p>
Building a personal connection with students can counteract some negative side effects of remote learning.
- Not being able to engage with students in-person due to the pandemic has presented several new challenges for educators, both technical and social. Digital tools have changed the way we all think about learning, but George Couros argues that more needs to be done to make up for what has been lost during "emergency remote teaching."
- One interesting way he has seen to bridge that gap and strengthen teacher-student and student-student relationships is through an event called Identity Day. Giving students the opportunity to share something they are passionate about makes them feel more connected and gets them involved in their education.
- "My hope is that we take these skills and these abilities we're developing through this process and we actually become so much better for our kids when we get back to our face-to-face setting," Couros says. He adds that while no one can predict the future, we can all do our part to adapt to it.
Chronic irregular sleep in children was associated with psychotic experiences in adolescence, according to a recent study out of the University of Birmingham's School of Psychology.