The Massachusetts Republican

Sen. Scott Brown (R-MA) has turned out to be the moderate, relatively independent Republican he said he would be. In other words he turned out not to be what many of his supporters hoped or imagined he would be.

When Brown beat Martha Coakley to win Ted Kennedy's old seat in January, he became a conservative hero. He had won an improbable victory against an overconfident Democratic machine in a solidly blue state. It was an enormous symbolic victory for Republicans, and seemed to be the turning of the tide that had swept them out of office a year before. Brown's election meant the end of the Democrats 60-vote majority in the Senate and would—it seemed—kill the Democrats' chance of passing health care reform.

But Brown's election didn't prove to be the turning point conservatives hoped. The Democrats' supposedly filibuster-proof majority was, as Mark Schmitt argues, always an illusion. The Democrats managed to pass health care reform without it in any case. And although the Democrats probably will lose a substantial number of seats in Congress, the fall elections no longer look like quite the rout they seemed they would be. Brown himself, while certainly no Democrat, has not been the stalwart conservative some of his supporters had hoped he would be.

In his first vote as senator, Brown was one of just five Republicans to join with Democrats to pass a $15 billion jobs bill. He  crossed party lines on the financial reform bill strongly opposed by the Republican leadership too. "Listen, I have always said I don’t work for Mitch McConnell and I don’t work for Harry Reid, I work for the people of Massachusetts," Brown told The New York Times. "I am not quite sure what all the surprise is, and people wondering kind of like, 'wow, he’s independent.' I have always been this way."

It shouldn't be a surprise. Massachusetts is still a liberal state, after all. And while Brown did court the support of national conservatives, he has never been all that conservative himself. As Boris Schor predicted when Brown was elected, Brown has turned out to be—alongside Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME) and Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME)—one of the most liberal Republicans in Congress.

When Brown was elected, I wrote that he had a choice. He could move to the right and use his celebrity to become a Republican figure on the national stage. He might even try to make a run at the presidency at 2012. But that would be a longshot, and moving to the right would almost certainly doom his chances of being reelected to the Senate when his term expires two years from now.

Or Brown could stay in the center the way he so far has. He will inevitably be accused of being a RINO—a Republican in Name Only—and draw fire from his old Tea Party supporters. But the Republican leadership will for the most part understand. They know a Republican from Massachusetts can't vote the same way a Republican from Kentucky can and still hope to get reeelected. They know staying in the center is likely Brown's only chance of a having a political future in Massachusetts.

Should you defend the free speech rights of neo-Nazis?

Former president of the ACLU Nadine Strossen discusses whether our society should always defend free speech rights, even for groups who would oppose such rights.

Sponsored by Charles Koch Foundation
  • Former ACLU president Nadine Strossen understands that protecting free speech rights isn't always a straightforward proposition.
  • In this video, Strossen describes the reasoning behind why the ACLU defended the free speech rights of neo-Nazis in Skokie, Illinois, 1977.
  • The opinions expressed in this video do not necessarily reflect the views of the Charles Koch Foundation, which encourages the expression of diverse viewpoints within a culture of civil discourse and mutual respect.
Keep reading Show less

Moon mission 2.0: What humanity will learn by going back to the Moon

Going back to the moon will give us fresh insights about the creation of our solar system.

  • July 2019 marks the 50th anniversary of the moon landing — Apollo 11.
  • Today, we have a strong scientific case for returning to the moon: the original rock samples that we took from the moon revolutionized our view of how Earth and the solar system formed. We could now glean even more insights with fresh, nonchemically-altered samples.
  • NASA plans to send humans to a crater in the South Pole of the moon because it's safer there, and would allow for better communications with people back on Earth.

NASA releases stunning image of ISS crossing in front of the sun

Strangely, the sun showed no sunspots at the time the photo was taken.

Image source: Rainee Colacurcio
Surprising Science
  • The photo shows the International Space Station as it orbits the Earth, as it does every 90 minutes.
  • The photo is remarkable because it offers a glimpse of the star at a time when there were no sunspots.
  • In November, astronauts aboard the ISS plan to grow Española chili pepper plants.
Keep reading Show less

U.S. Air Force warns UFO enthusiasts against storming Area 51

Jokesters and serious Area 51 raiders would be met with military force.

Politics & Current Affairs
  • Facebook joke event to "raid Area 51" has already gained 1,000,000 "going" attendees.
  • The U.S. Air Force has issued an official warning to potential "raiders."
  • If anyone actually tries to storm an American military base, the use of deadly force is authorized.
Keep reading Show less