How to Get Around Lobbying Rules
What do you call it when corporations get together with politicians to work out the details of legislation? Normally, of course, it’s called “lobbying” and is subject to federal regulations requiring corporations to disclose how much they’re spending and what policies they’re advocating. But if you call the meetings between corporations and politicians “education,” you don’t have to worry about federal lobbying rules.
The trick, as Laura Sullivan reported for NPR—in an article that deserves to be widely read—is to set up an organization like the American Legislative Exchange Council. Although formally a non-profit, the American Legislative Exchange Council functions as a front organization for corporate lobbying groups. State legislators pay a nominal $50 annual membership fee, but the group is primarily funded by big corporations like ExxonMobil, Pfizer, and Reynolds American, each of which donates tens of thousands of dollars. The American Legislative Council then hosts conferences for lawmakers and their families—lawmakers are given “scholarships” paying their way—which include open bar parties and expensive entertainment.
While at these conferences, the lawmakers sit down with the group’s corporate sponsors and put together “model bills” to demonstrate legislative “best practices.” The American Legislative Exchange Council’s senior policy director, Michael Bowman, insists that it’s not lobbying, because the groups corporate members aren’t pushing for legislation so much as helping lawmakers come up with legislative ideas. But that's a distinction without much difference, since lobbyists make their views known to legislators while treating them and their families to expensive junkets. It’s certainly not legislators' company corporate representatives are interested in.
Sullivan reports that more than 200 of the group’s model bills became laws over the past year. Arizona’s controversial law making failure to carry immigration papers a crime and granting the police broad authority to detain suspected illegal immigrants was among them. In fact, Sullivan found, the bill was originally written at one of these conferences with the help of the Corrections Corporation of America, a private prison management company which sees the detention of illegal immigrants as its next big market.
If the companies that underwrite the American Legislative Exchange Council had paid for the meetings directly they would have had to disclose what they spending and what they were spending it on. And the legislators would have to report the expenses for their trips as gifts. But instead as long they call it “education,” companies can write off what their lobbying efforts as a business expense—or even as a charitable donation.
Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.
No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.
Research by neuroscientists at MIT's Picower Institute for Learning and Memory helps explain how the brain regulates arousal.
The big day has come: You are taking your road test to get your driver's license. As you start your mom's car with a stern-faced evaluator in the passenger seat, you know you'll need to be alert but not so excited that you make mistakes. Even if you are simultaneously sleep-deprived and full of nervous energy, you need your brain to moderate your level of arousal so that you do your best.
A disturbing interview given by a KGB defector in 1984 describes America of today and outlines four stages of mass brainwashing used by the KGB.
- Bezmenov described this process as "a great brainwashing" which has four basic stages.
- The first stage is called "demoralization" which takes from 15 to 20 years to achieve.
- According to the former KGB agent, that is the minimum number of years it takes to re-educate one generation of students that is normally exposed to the ideology of its country.
When these companies compete, in the current system, the people lose.
- When a company reaches the top of the ladder, they typically kick it away so that others cannot climb up on it. The aim? So that another company can't compete.
- When this happens in the pharmaceutical world, certain companies stay at the top of the ladder, through broadly-protected patents, at the cost of everyday people benefitting from increased competition.
- Since companies have worked out how to legally game the system, Amin argues we need to get rid of this "one size fits all" system, which treats product innovation — "tweaks" — the same as product invention.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.