Why Soviet Russia's Most Evil Scientist Is Gaining a New Following

The biologist Trofim Lysenko, blamed for millions of deaths, is experiencing a revival in Russia.

Russian biologist Trofim Lysenko (1898-1976) is a very controversial figure in the history of science. He was a star Soviet scientist, making discoveries that improved crop yields for the fledgling communist state. But some also consider him responsible for millions of deaths during the Stalin era, pointing to the role his ideas played in causing a terrible country-wide famine. 

Lysenko fell out of favor in 1965 even with Soviet historians and the term Lysenkoism came to be linked to pseudoscience. But lately, he has experienced somewhat of a resurgence in Russia, both due to new advances in epigenetics and for political reasons.

A devout communist, Lysenko believed in the promise of the Soviet revolution and looked to create a new science that matched his nation’s ambitions. A Marxist, Lysenko rejected traditional genetics for ideological reasons - declaring that the concept of the same genes being passed down to the children just enforced the status quo. Instead he was a strong proponent of the notion that changes acquired in life can be inherited by future generations.

What shapes plants and animals is their environment alone, according to Lysenko. This kind of thinking gelled with the Soviet ideal that an entirely new man can be created. Lysenko’s implementation of this idea in Russian agriculture led to widespread devastation, setting back Soviet farming and genetic research for years.

Credit: Corbis.

Lysenko came to prominence in the Soviet Union in 1928, after publishing a paper on vernalization - a process of cooling the seeds of winter cereals to make them behave like spring cereals. This had practical applications in a country suffering from bitter colds and devastating famines caused by forced collectivization. Lysenko’s method allowed seeds to bear crops when planted in the spring. This success made him a household name and he was eventually put in charge of the Soviet Academy of Agricultural Sciences by Stalin himself. 

The biologist’s next big idea was that vernalized plants would exhibit the same behavior as their offspring - a claim that we now know was possibly based on falsified evidence. As he was in such a powerful position, he was able to test this theory and other ideas like planting seeds very close together and not using fertilizers or pesticides on a state-wide basis. As the journalist Jasper Becker describes in his book Hungry Ghosts, Lysenko-treated crops failed, including wheat, rye and potatoes. While Stalin is ultimately the one in charge during this period and bears the brunt of the responsibility for at least 7 million people killed from famine, Lysenko’s methods made the food situation much worse, resulting in countless deaths.

As per a profile in the Atlantic, China adopted Lysenkoism as well in the late 1950s, bringing about even worse famines.  At least 30 million people died of starvation, with some resorting to cannibalism.

So why then is Lysenko experiencing a resurgence of appreciation in Russia? For one, the field of epigenetics, the study of changes in “gene expression,” has grown considerably. According to epigenetic research, it turns out that some environmentally-produced changes can, in fact, be passed from parent to child, as was part of Lysenko’s claim. Of course, Lysenko did not believe in genes at all, so his ideas were not exactly on point.

A big reason for Lysenko’s revival is driven by rising anti-Western sentiment in Russia, according to an article in Current Biology. Lysenko proponents “accuse the science of genetics of serving the interests of American imperialism and acting against the interests of Russia,” say the writers. Since Lysenko paved his own way, standing up to the West, he is regarded as a hero by some. This new appreciation also coincides with an improving image of Stalin, with 47% of Russians saying in a recent poll that the dictator had the kind of character they approved of as well as “managerial skills.”

Want to learn more about epigenetics? Check out this video:

Related Articles

Why birds fly south for the winter—and more about bird migration

What do we see from watching birds move across the country?

E. Fleischer
Surprising Science
  • A total of eight billion birds migrate across the U.S. in the fall.
  • The birds who migrate to the tropics fair better than the birds who winter in the U.S.
  • Conservationists can arguably use these numbers to encourage the development of better habitats in the U.S., especially if temperatures begin to vary in the south.

The migration of birds — and we didn't even used to know that birds migrated; we assumed they hibernated; the modern understanding of bird migration was established when a white stork landed in a German village with an arrow from Central Africa through its neck in 1822 — draws us in the direction of having an understanding of the world. A bird is here and then travels somewhere else. Where does it go? It's a variation on the poetic refrain from The Catcher in the Rye. Where do the ducks go? How many are out there? What might it encounter along the way?

While there is a yearly bird count conducted every Christmas by amateur bird watchers across the country done in conjunction with The Audubon Society, the Cornell Lab of Ornithology recently released the results of a study that actually go some way towards answering heretofore abstract questions: every fall, as per cloud computing and 143 weather radar stations, four billion birds migrate into the United States from Canada and four billion more head south to the tropics.

In other words: the birds who went three to four times further than the birds staying in the U.S. faired better than the birds who stayed in the U.S. Why?

Part of the answer could be very well be what you might hear from a conservationist — only with numbers to back it up: the U.S. isn't built for birds. As Ken Rosenberg, the other co-author of the study, notes: "Birds wintering in the U.S. may have more habitat disturbances and more buildings to crash into, and they might not be adapted for that."

The other option is that birds lay more offspring in the U.S. than those who fly south for the winter.

What does observing eight billion birds mean in practice? To give myself a counterpoint to those numbers, I drove out to the Joppa Flats Education Center in Northern Massachusetts. The Center is a building that sits at the entrance to the Parker River National Wildlife Refuge and overlooks the Merrimack River, which is what I climbed the stairs up to the observation deck to see.

Once there, I paused. I took a breath. I listened. I looked out into the distance. Tiny flecks Of Bonaparte's Gulls drew small white lines across the length of the river and the wave of the grass toward a nearby city. What appeared to be flecks of double-crested cormorants made their way to the sea. A telescope downstairs enabled me to watch small gull-like birds make their way along the edges of the river, quietly pecking away at food just beneath the surface of the water. This was the experience of watching maybe half a dozen birds over fifteen-to-twenty minutes, which only served to drive home the scale of birds studied.

How does alcohol affect your brain?

Explore how alcohol affects your brain, from the first sip at the bar to life-long drinking habits.

(Photo by Angie Garrett/Wikimedia Commons)
Mind & Brain
  • Alcohol is the world's most popular drug and has been a part of human culture for at least 9,000 years.
  • Alcohol's effects on the brain range from temporarily limiting mental activity to sustained brain damage, depending on levels consumed and frequency of use.
  • Understanding how alcohol affects your brain can help you determine what drinking habits are best for you.
Keep reading Show less

Scientists sequence the genome of this threatened species

If you want to know what makes a Canadian lynx a Canadian lynx a team of DNA sequencers has figured that out.

Surprising Science
  • A team at UMass Amherst recently sequenced the genome of the Canadian lynx.
  • It's part of a project intending to sequence the genome of every vertebrate in the world.
  • Conservationists interested in the Canadian lynx have a new tool to work with.

If you want to know what makes a Canadian lynx a Canadian lynx, I can now—as of this month—point you directly to the DNA of a Canadian lynx, and say, "That's what makes a lynx a lynx." The genome was sequenced by a team at UMass Amherst, and it's one of 15 animals whose genomes have been sequenced by the Vertebrate Genomes Project, whose stated goal is to sequence the genome of all 66,000 vertebrate species in the world.

Sequencing the genome of a particular species of an animal is important in terms of preserving genetic diversity. Future generations don't necessarily have to worry about our memory of the Canadian Lynx warping the way hearsay warped perception a long time ago.

elephant by Guillaume le Clerc

Artwork: Guillaume le Clerc / Wikimedia Commons

13th-century fantastical depiction of an elephant.

It is easy to see how one can look at 66,000 genomic sequences stored away as being the analogous equivalent of the Svalbard Global Seed Vault. It is a potential tool for future conservationists.

But what are the practicalities of sequencing the genome of a lynx beyond engaging with broad bioethical questions? As the animal's habitat shrinks and Earth warms, the Canadian lynx is demonstrating less genetic diversity. Cross-breeding with bobcats in some portions of the lynx's habitat also represents a challenge to the lynx's genetic makeup. The two themselves are also linked: warming climates could drive Canadian lynxes to cross-breed with bobcats.

John Organ, chief of the U.S. Geological Survey's Cooperative Fish and Wildlife units, said to MassLive that the results of the sequencing "can help us look at land conservation strategies to help maintain lynx on the landscape."

What does DNA have to do with land conservation strategies? Consider the fact that the food found in a landscape, the toxins found in a landscape, or the exposure to drugs can have an impact on genetic activity. That potential change can be transmitted down the generative line. If you know exactly how a lynx's DNA is impacted by something, then the environment they occupy can be fine-tuned to meet the needs of the lynx and any other creature that happens to inhabit that particular portion of the earth.

Given that the Trump administration is considering withdrawing protection for the Canadian lynx, a move that caught scientists by surprise, it is worth having as much information on hand as possible for those who have an interest in preserving the health of this creature—all the way down to the building blocks of a lynx's life.