Prof. David Nutt awarded the John Maddox Prize for Standing up for Science

Prof. David Nutt is a man who needs no introduction. The expert psychiatrist, neuropsychopharmacologist and Chair of the Independent Scientific Committee on Drugs (ISCD) was made world famous by former Home Secretary Jacqui Smith who in 2008 fired him from the British Government's Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs for providing the British Government and the public with advice about drugs based on science. This wasn't a major setback for the professor, who wasn't on the government payroll and was being flatly ignored by the government anyway, but in the short time that he has been free from interference a lot of good has come from his liberation.

In 2011 I had the pleasure of interviewing Prof. Nutt, we talked about the professor's liberation from the subliminal pressure to give the government the answers they wanted and the freedom of being able to start the ISCD. Only a few months earlier Prof Nutt had published a breakdown of drug harms in The Lancet that turned the government's classification system on its head.

We discussed how that year the new government was already following in the previous government's footsteps; by pushing science out of the ACMD and harming scientific progress by banning chemicals before science had a hope in hell of figuring out whether or not they might even be remotely likely to be useful.

The John Maddox Prize awarded by Nature and Sense About Science for standing up for science demonstrates the support within the scientific community for the man outcast from government for confronting the lack of respect for science within the current system. Yesterday Prof. Nutt described in The Conversation how the situation has worsened, how science has recently been deprived of a great many entire groups of extremely promising new compounds:

"Instead we have the systematic banning of new drugs through the temporary banning orders. We know in the last month they’ve banned a whole series of compounds which were being developed for treatment of Parkinson’s Disease and a new tracer which looks to be the best for measuring serotonin in the brain. And they’ve done that without even knowing that these drugs were being developed for those purposes. They’re just so obsessed with the recreational use of drugs that they miss the science.

MDMA in some people with Parkinson’s Disease does have a very profound beneficial effect, making their abnormal movements better. So groups have been working on finding analogues [new compounds with similar chemical structures] that aren’t illegal so they can be made more easily available to patients – and it was a series of these compounds that have just been banned under a temporary banning order because they fall under a general structural terminology of a benzofuran. So people can’t work on them anymore."

Prof. Nutt goes on to call on the scientific community to defend the work done by scientists that increasingly is being made impossible by the law: "We need scientists to stand up and say let’s do the right kind of science to actually improve health, and let’s make it such that the laws allow the therapeutic potential of drugs like MDMA to be developed."

The professor slams the "continued deluge of misinformation from the Home Office about the relative harm of drugs and how the drug policies are working when they’re not". The situation in the UK remains dire, but Prof. Nutt is still happy to be free from the clutches of the Home Office, "Did it give me a much greater voice in terms of thinking about the science? Probably. Overall it was a net benefit to the scientific field I work in."

If you want free, honest, impartial advice about drugs from experts not politicians, head over to, the website of the Independent Scientific Committee on Drugs. On the bright side, that's not something I could say in 2008. Also check out the Professor's excellent and very readable book: Drugs Without the Hot Air.

To keep up to date with this blog you can follow Neurobonkers on TwitterFacebookRSS or join the mailing list.

3D printing might save your life one day. It's transforming medicine and health care.

What can 3D printing do for medicine? The "sky is the limit," says Northwell Health researcher Dr. Todd Goldstein.

Northwell Health
Sponsored by Northwell Health
  • Medical professionals are currently using 3D printers to create prosthetics and patient-specific organ models that doctors can use to prepare for surgery.
  • Eventually, scientists hope to print patient-specific organs that can be transplanted safely into the human body.
  • Northwell Health, New York State's largest health care provider, is pioneering 3D printing in medicine in three key ways.
Keep reading Show less

Adam Gopnik on the rhinoceros of liberalism vs. the unicorns of everything else

Torn between absolutism on the left and the right, classical liberalism—with its core values of compassion and incremental progress whereby the once-radical becomes the mainstream—is in need of a good defense. And Adam Gopnik is its lawyer.

Think Again Podcasts
  • Liberalism as "radical pragmatism"
  • Intersectionality and civic discourse
  • How "a thousand small sanities" tackled drunk driving, normalized gay marriage, and could control gun violence
Keep reading Show less

You weren't born ‘to be useful’, Irish president tells young philosophers

Irish president believes students need philosophy.

Personal Growth
  • President of Ireland Michael D. Higgins calls for students to be thought of as more than tools made to be useful.
  • Higgins believes that philosophy and history should be a basic requirement forming a core education.
  • The Irish Young Philosopher Awards is one such event that is celebrating this discipline among the youth.
Keep reading Show less

Fascism and conspiracy theories: The symptoms of broken communication

The lost practice of face-to-face communication has made the world a more extreme place.

  • The world was saner when we spoke face-to-face, argues John Cameron Mitchell. Not looking someone in the eye when you talk to them raises the potential for miscommunication and conflict.
  • Social media has been an incredible force for activism and human rights, but it's also negatively affected our relationship with the media. We are now bombarded 24/7 with news that either drives us to anger or apathy.
  • Sitting behind a screen makes polarization worse, and polarization is fertile ground for conspiracy theories and fascism, which Cameron describes as irrationally blaming someone else for your problems.
Keep reading Show less