from the world's big
thinkers
Why We Refuse to Learn From History
Even those who know and remember many historical facts still repeat the mistakes of that past.
“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” So George Santayana, Harvard intellectual, whose main contribution to history was to write books no one reads any more.
“History is bunk.” So Henry Ford, high school drop-out, whose inventive genius transformed history.
Both were wrong. History is not bunk. The Founders of the United States, men like John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, George Washington and Benjamin Franklin, believed that history was the most important subject for all citizens of a free republic to study.
Even those who know and remember many historical facts still repeat the mistakes of that past.
The generation of politicians and military leaders in Europe of 1914 were well-versed in history. Most were graduates of schools and universities that focused on Greek and Latin and the study of ancient and modern history. These leaders could have told you in detail how the Peloponnesian War began in 431 BC. An alliance of Greek states led by Athens went to war with an alliance of Greek states led by Sparta. The war began over a relatively insignificant event in a far off part of the Greek world. The war could have been avoided. But bungling politicians allowed it to grow into the most destructive war in Greek history.
These same 1914 politicians would allow an assassination in a far-off corner of Europe to bring the two alliances of the great powers to bungle into a war that would consume the lives of 11 million soldiers and altar forever the civilization of Europe and the world.
After World War I, a new generation of politicians, many knowing and remembering a great deal of history, would follow the same course to an even more destructive war, killing 50 million men and women.
This blog is devoted to Learning the Lessons of the Past. Even more importantly, this blog is devoted to applying these lessons of the past to making decisions in the present and to planning for the future. This is what I mean by “historical thought.”
The Founders of the United States believed that the purpose of studying history was to make us better, better as individuals, better as citizens of a free republic. In other words, the Founders shared the view of the classical Greek and Roman historians, like Herodotus, Thucydides, Livy and Tacitus. The study of history has a moral purpose.
Uh oh- I have made you mad. We do not believe this today. Oh, yes, many books about history are written. Biographies of presidents become best sellers. There are numerous television channels, devoted to history. Along with the electronic media, we are awash in historical information.
But as a society, we do not think historically. We do not use the lessons of the past to make decisions in the present and to plan for the future.
If American political and business leaders thought historically, American troops would not be fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq. The financial crisis would not have happened.
The world of 2011 suffers from a fatal delusion. We believe that we are immune to the lessons – the laws – of history. We believe that our modern science and technology has lifted us above the lessons of history.
However, as the American Founders understood, the lessons of history endure because human nature never changed. All the human emotions are the same today as in Egypt of the pharaohs or China in the time of Confucius: Love, hate, ambition, the lust for power, kindness, generosity, and inhumanity. The good and bad of human nature is simply poured into new vehicles created by science and technology.
In our next post, we will discuss the First Lesson of History: We do not learn from history.
J. Rufus Fears
[Image: George Santayana, Wikimedia Commons.]
Radical innovation: Unlocking the future of human invention
Ready to see the future? Nanotronics CEO Matthew Putman talks innovation and the solutions that are right under our noses.
Innovation in manufacturing has crawled since the 1950s. That's about to speed up.
34 years ago, a KGB defector chillingly predicted modern America
A disturbing interview given by a KGB defector in 1984 describes America of today and outlines four stages of mass brainwashing used by the KGB.
- Bezmenov described this process as "a great brainwashing" which has four basic stages.
- The first stage is called "demoralization" which takes from 15 to 20 years to achieve.
- According to the former KGB agent, that is the minimum number of years it takes to re-educate one generation of students that is normally exposed to the ideology of its country.
Non-partisan brains differ from those of partisans
Non-partisans are real, and their lack of partisanship has a cognative element.
A person casts their vote.
- A new study suggests that the brains of non-partisans function differently than those of partisans.
- Blood flow to regions associated with problem solving differed between the two groups.
- The findings may lead to further research in how differences in brain activity affect personality.
Some people just really don’t want to join political clubs. Go figure.
<p>The study, published in The Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties as "<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17457289.2020.1801695" target="_blank">Neural Nonpartisans</a>," looked at blood flow in the brains of partisans and non-partisans as they played a betting game. The test subjects, all of which were from San Diego County, had their brains scanned as they decided between options with guaranteed payoffs or ones with the chance to lose or gain <a href="https://www.exeter.ac.uk/news/homepage/title_809320_en.html" target="_blank">money</a>. The results were later compared to their voter registrations to confirm their partisanship or lack thereof. </p><p> The brain scans demonstrated that blood flow to the right medial temporal pole, orbitofrontal/medial prefrontal cortex, and right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex differs between partisans and non-partisans as they made decisions in the previously mentioned game. These regions are associated with socially relevant <a href="https://radiopaedia.org/articles/temporal-pole?lang=us#:~:text=The%20left%20temporal%20pole%20is,and%20socially%20relevant%20memory%202." target="_blank">memory</a>, decision <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbitofrontal_cortex" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer dofollow">making</a>, and goal-related <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/neuroscience/ventrolateral-prefrontal-cortex" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer dofollow">responses</a>. Previous studies have also shown them to be essential for <a href="https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2020-08/uoe-tbo081020.php" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer dofollow">social connections</a>. </p><p>This demonstrates that the brains of non-partisans approach non-political problems differently than the brains of <a href="https://www.studyfinds.org/democratic-republican-voters-have-different-brains-than-nonpartisans/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer dofollow">partisans</a>. Future studies may go further, and see if other brain functions differ between the two groups. </p><p>The study is not without limitations; there were a mere 110 test subjects overall. However, given the general lack of research on non-partisans, the study is still an excellent starting point for further research.</p>What does this mean for politics?
<p>Lead author Dr. Darren Schreiber laid out his interpretation of the data and offered takeaways:</p><p> "There is skepticism about the existence of non-partisan voters, that they are just people who don't want to state their preferences. But we have shown their brain activity is different, even aside from politics. We think this has important implications for political campaigning – non-partisans need to be considered a third voter group. In the USA 40 percent of people are thought to be non-partisan voters. Previous research shows negative campaigning deters them from voting. This exploratory study suggests US politicians need to treat swing voters differently, and positive campaigning may be important in winning their support. While heated rhetoric may appeal to a party's base, it can drive non-partisans away from politics all together."</p><p>He references a variety of studies on the effects of negative campaigning. It is widely agreed that it drives down <a href="https://pcl.stanford.edu/research/books/goingnegative/" target="_blank">turnout</a>.</p><p>A variety of studies suggest that differences in political opinion relate to the differences in the brain. While these studies can't tell us how to solve our various political problems, they can offer us ways to help bridge the gap. People who don't leap at the opportunity to join political clubs must be interreacted with differently than those who do to encourage their involvement. While this may come as a shock to seasoned political junkies, it may also come with benefits to our political discourse. </p>Police can track cars nationwide with new license plate surveillance network
The system is basically facial recognition technology, but for cars.
- Some police departments use automatic license plate readers to track suspects.
- A company called Flock Safety is now allowing police departments to opt in to a national network, which shares data on car movements.
- Privacy advocates are concerned about the potential for errors and abuse.
Map tracking the car movements of a murder suspect in Alabama.
Flock Safety
<p>Flock Safety says its cameras help police solve more crimes. The company <a href="https://www.flocksafety.com/flock-safety-resources" target="_blank" rel="dofollow">website</a> notes that "70% of crime involves a vehicle" and law enforcement agencies say "a license plate is the best piece of evidence to track leads and solve crimes."</p><p>But critics of Flock Safety have raised concerns over the potential for errors and abuse. In August, for example, <a href="https://gizmodo.com/cops-terrorize-black-family-but-blame-license-plate-rea-1844602731" target="_blank">police in Colorado held a family at gunpoint</a> after a license plate reader flagged a car as stolen. It turned out to be the wrong vehicle.</p><p>With TALON, police would also have unprecedented information about the movements of citizens. It's not hard to see how this data could be abused. Think, for example, of the Florida police officer who used the Driver and Vehicle Information Database (D.A.V.I.D.) to get women's contact information so he could <a href="https://www.mercurynews.com/2019/03/11/police-in-florida-allege-officer-used-database-to-gets-dates/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer dofollow">ask them out on dates</a>.</p>Flock Safety
<p>It's currently unclear how many police departments plan to join TALON. But like the advent of facial recognition technologies, the spread of automatic license plate reader technology highlights how mass surveillance isn't always driven by the state.</p><p style="margin-left: 20px;">"We often think of dystopian surveillance as something that's imposed by an authoritarian government," Evan Greer, deputy director of the digital rights group Fight for the Future, told <a href="https://www.cnet.com/news/license-plate-tracking-for-police-set-to-go-nationwide/?utm_source=reddit.com" target="_blank">CNET</a>. "It's clearer every day that there is an enormous threat posed by privately owned and managed surveillance regimes, which will be weaponized by the rich and powerful to protect not just their wealth but the exploitative system that helped them amass it."</p>Study: Names change how an infant's memory encodes objects
A new study shows that naming conventions will change how infants represent objects in their memories.