Why Women and Men Think Differently: Social Development, Not Gender Stereotypes
When levels of prosperity in a given country increase, women are more likely to benefit from improvements to education institutions. Any cognitive differences between men and women are not solely inherited.
What's the Latest?
Based on interviews conducted with more than 30,000 Europeans aged 50 to 84, researchers at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis in Vienna have determined that men and women think differently in two fundamental ways. Women have better episodic memory, i.e. they can recall events more accurately, because memory is strongly associated with emotion. To recall an emotion means to recall the emotion felt at the time. Men showed greater strength than women in numeracy, i.e. the kinds of computational skills required for tasks like physics, engineering, and mathematics.
What's the Big Idea?
An important question to the researchers was where these difference emerge from? Are they genetic or purely social? Or an amalgamation of the two?
Whether women actually are more empathetic than men is debatable. It may be that society has expected such capacity from the principal child-carers for so long that it has become ingrained. The same goes for numeracy. Is science dominated by men because they are better at it, or because it was a career choice not widely open to women before the late 20th century?
The research notes that when levels of prosperity in a given country increase, women are more likely to benefit from improvements to educational institutions. Ultimately the study shows that any cognitive differences between men and women are not solely inherited.
Read more at the Economist
Photo credit: Shutterstock
How a cataclysm worse than what killed the dinosaurs destroyed 90 percent of all life on Earth.
While the demise of the dinosaurs gets more attention as far as mass extinctions go, an even more disastrous event called "the Great Dying” or the “End-Permian Extinction” happened on Earth prior to that. Now scientists discovered how this cataclysm, which took place about 250 million years ago, managed to kill off more than 90 percent of all life on the planet.
A new study discovers the “liking gap” — the difference between how we view others we’re meeting for the first time, and the way we think they’re seeing us.
We tend to be defensive socially. When we meet new people, we’re often concerned with how we’re coming off. Our anxiety causes us to be so concerned with the impression we’re creating that we fail to notice that the same is true of the other person as well. A new study led by Erica J. Boothby, published on September 5 in Psychological Science, reveals how people tend to like us more in first encounters than we’d ever suspect.
Using advanced laser technology, scientists at NASA will track global changes in ice with greater accuracy.
Leaving from Vandenberg Air Force base in California this coming Saturday, at 8:46 a.m. ET, the Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite-2 — or, the "ICESat-2" — is perched atop a United Launch Alliance Delta II rocket, and when it assumes its orbit, it will study ice layers at Earth's poles, using its only payload, the Advance Topographic Laser Altimeter System (ATLAS).
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.