What Killed the Dinosaurs? Volcano, Asteroid, or Both.
What killed the dinosaurs? Scientists have been arguing over the possibilities for years. But new evidence may muddy the waters for the popular asteroid theory.
Sixty-six million years ago a cataclysmic event caused an entire population to go extinct. We know them today as the dinosaurs, but the reason for their extinction has divided the scientific community into two main camps: by asteroid or by volcanic eruption. The latter camp has discovered new evidence that may tip the scales in their favor, or at least balance the argument for the less-popular theory.
Joel Achenbach of the Washington Post writes on a recent paper published in Science that discusses the latest dinosaur extinction discovery that has come out of India. The new evidence comes from within the Deccan Traps, a geological formation that covers 200,000 square miles around Mumbai. The area was created by a volcanic eruption. Scientists were able to date the crystal samples from the site, which contain trace amounts of uranium that have since decayed into lead. Because it's well-known how long uranium takes to decay, scientists were able to pinpoint when the volcano began its devastating eruption 250,000 years—before the extinction event. But it ended around 500,000 years after, adding an interesting twist.
The popular belief held by scientists has been that an asteroid hit the coastal line of the Yucatan peninsula, disrupting the Earth's climate, causing the dinosaurs to die off. However, this new evidence has Blair Schoene, lead author of the paper and a Professor of Geosciences at Princeton, favoring both catastrophes as the cause for the mass extinction.
"Both are potentially really important. I don’t know if we can say the extinction would have or would not have happened without both of them.”
“I sort of favor the one-two punch idea.”
His co-author, Gerta Keller, has a more one-sided view of the event, maintaining the theory that the Deccan Traps eruption caused the mass-extinction. She views that the asteroid impact happened too early to cause the die-off and sees the findings in India as strength in the case that a volcanic eruption was the extinction event.
Others in the community believe that there's already enough evidence with the asteroid theory, why dig any deeper? Achenbach believes it conflicts with scientists' preference to keep it simple, when a volcano only muddies the waters. But some persist in adding the volcano possibility into the equation--perhaps the asteroid caused a chain reaction that jolted the volcanoes, or maybe a virus was also in the mix. The bottom line is it's not certain.
The extinction event for the dinosaurs is not an open-and-shut case to say the least, new evidence will likely surface sometime in the future that will leave scientists to debate for years to come.
Read more at Washington Post
Photo Credit: Shutterstock
Research in plant neurobiology shows that plants have senses, intelligence and emotions.
- The field of plant neurobiology studies the complex behavior of plants.
- Plants were found to have 15-20 senses, including many like humans.
- Some argue that plants may have awareness and intelligence, while detractors persist.
Most people think human extinction would be bad. These people aren't philosophers.
- A new opinion piece in The New York Times argues that humanity is so horrible to other forms of life that our extinction wouldn't be all that bad, morally speaking.
- The author, Dr. Todd May, is a philosopher who is known for advising the writers of The Good Place.
- The idea of human extinction is a big one, with lots of disagreement on its moral value.
Since the idea of locality is dead, space itself may not be an aloof vacuum: Something welds things together, even at great distances.
- Realists believe that there is an exactly understandable way the world is — one that describes processes independent of our intervention. Anti-realists, however, believe realism is too ambitious — too hard. They believe we pragmatically describe our interactions with nature — not truths that are independent of us.
- In nature, properties of Particle B may depend on what we choose to measure or manipulate with Particle A, even at great distances.
- In quantum mechanics, there is no explanation for this. "It just comes out that way," says Smolin. Realists struggle with this because it would imply certain things can travel faster than light, which still seems improbable.