Remember the Pontiac Aztek? Here's What Its Failure Can Teach Us About Poor Project Management.
A new piece in Car and Driver details the awful corporate situation that birthed one of recent memory's most spectacular automobile industry failures.
If you're in your mid-20s like me, you might remember that one kid back in middle school whose mom drove a Pontiac Aztek. I say "one kid" because there was only about one family per municipality that, for whatever reason, actually dropped money on this objectively hideous vehicle. In fact, the Aztek's failure was so huge that it contributed to GM ultimately scuttling the Pontiac brand in 2010.
Over at Car and Driver, auto executive Bob Lutz tells of the toxic corporate culture that helped produce one of the biggest industry flops of recent memory:
"At the time, GM was criticized for never doing anything new, never taking a chance. So [then-GM chairman Rick] Wagoner and the automotive strategy board decreed that henceforth, 40 percent of all new GM products would be 'innovative.' That started a trend toward setting internal goals that meant nothing to the customer. Everything that looked reasonably radical got green-lit... These things require a culture of complete acquiescence and intimidation, led by a strong dictatorial individual who wants it that way."
The "individual" Lutz refers to is then-Product Development Head Don Hackworth, a really awful sounding guy who pushed the Aztek project by employing aggressive intimidation and a totalitarian attitude. Legitimate concerns about the car's design were quashed in favor of maintaining the party line. Hackworth's team worked in fear of crossing him and withheld their opinions lest they lose their positions. This awful work environment was instrumental in producing a car that only satisfied unchecked Pontiac executives. The customers, as you now know, took off running.
So what's the lesson here? First, I have to offer a hat-tip to writer Craig Calcaterra, who first brought this idea up on Twitter earlier today:
Background on how the Pontiac Aztek happened. The central lesson here applies to a LOT of bad corporate decisions. http://t.co/beaN2mOMyN
— Craig Calcaterra (@craigcalcaterra) October 13, 2014
As Calcaterra later went on to post, the process by which the Aztek was developed suited Pontiac's internal whims without ever giving a thought as to what the consumer wanted. Many of us can probably think of examples from our own work experience where adhering to "the process" or "protocol" or "tradition" got in the way of productivity. It's imperative that leaders of any organization identifying those instances and do away with them.
I would add that a leader who incites fear in his or her team isn't much of a leader at all. At a certain point, the person at the top of any group has to be a positive inspiration for those below. A dictatorial approach that quashes any potential criticism will restrict innovation and only lead to stagnation and failure.
Read more at Car and Driver
Photo credit: Auto Reverie / Flickr
It's unlikely that there's anything on the planet that is worth the cost of shipping it back
- In the second season of National Geographic Channel's MARS (premiering tonight, 11/12/18,) privatized miners on the red planet clash with a colony of international scientists
- Privatized mining on both Mars and the Moon is likely to occur in the next century
- The cost of returning mined materials from Space to the Earth will probably be too high to create a self-sustaining industry, but the resources may have other uses at their origin points
Humans evolved to live in the cold through a number of environmental and genetic factors.
- According to some relatively new research, many of our early human cousins preceded Homo sapien migrations north by hundreds of thousands or even millions of years.
- Cross-breeding with other ancient hominids gave some subsets of human population the genes to contend and thrive in colder and harsher climates.
- Behavioral and dietary changes also helped humans adapt to cold climates.
A study started out trying to see the effect of sexist attacks on women authors, but it found something deeper.
- It's well known that abusive comments online happen to women more than men
- Such comments caused a "significant effect for the abusive comment on author credibility and intention to seek news from the author and outlet in the future"
- Some news organizations already heavily moderate or even ban comments entirely; this should underscore that effort
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.