German Court Criminalizes Circumcision, Debate Erupts
A German court has effectively criminalized male circumcision, and while the ruling is not binding on any other body, debate over religious and individual freedom has erupted.
What's the Latest Development?
A decision handed down by a German court two weeks ago, in which a judge ruled that circumcision constitutes bodily harm and is therefore punishable under criminal law, has sparked a debate among religious groups and other activists. Though the ruling involved a Muslim boy and has no bearing on other legal cases, the specter of religious intolerance has been raised by the Conference of European Rabbis, calling the decision the "worst attack on Jewish life since the Holocaust." Members of the German government have tried to calm opponents of the ruling, including the state of Israel, by emphasizing that the decision is not legally binding on other courts.
What's the Big Idea?
Issues of religious and individual freedom surround the circumcision controversy. While the Muslim and Jewish faiths consider the practice a rite, others see the procedure as a medically unnecessary and painful experience that, like female circumcision, the state should put a stop to. Last week, the New York Times hosted an online debate explaining the various sides to this cultural impasse: Perhaps 16 should be given as age for circumcision consent; Whether the procedure is medically necessarily depends on where it is done, e.g. Africa; The state should neither require nor forbid religious procedures...
Photo credit: Shutterstock.com
How a cataclysm worse than what killed the dinosaurs destroyed 90 percent of all life on Earth.
While the demise of the dinosaurs gets more attention as far as mass extinctions go, an even more disastrous event called "the Great Dying” or the “End-Permian Extinction” happened on Earth prior to that. Now scientists discovered how this cataclysm, which took place about 250 million years ago, managed to kill off more than 90 percent of all life on the planet.
A new study discovers the “liking gap” — the difference between how we view others we’re meeting for the first time, and the way we think they’re seeing us.
We tend to be defensive socially. When we meet new people, we’re often concerned with how we’re coming off. Our anxiety causes us to be so concerned with the impression we’re creating that we fail to notice that the same is true of the other person as well. A new study led by Erica J. Boothby, published on September 5 in Psychological Science, reveals how people tend to like us more in first encounters than we’d ever suspect.
Using advanced laser technology, scientists at NASA will track global changes in ice with greater accuracy.
Leaving from Vandenberg Air Force base in California this coming Saturday, at 8:46 a.m. ET, the Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite-2 — or, the "ICESat-2" — is perched atop a United Launch Alliance Delta II rocket, and when it assumes its orbit, it will study ice layers at Earth's poles, using its only payload, the Advance Topographic Laser Altimeter System (ATLAS).
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.