For the Artist, Fame May Risk Ruining Their Best Work
When an artist achieves visibility in popular culture — when they become famous — their work is forever changed.
When an artist achieves visibility in popular culture — when they become famous — their work is forever changed. They must embrace the fame, try to expunge it, or content themselves with being under the watchful eye of the public.
Writing at The New York Review of Books, British novelist Tim Parks suggests that success may be more stifling to an artist's work than forever toiling in obscurity. At least the latter preserves the innocence of artistic creation, says Parks.
James Joyce and Samuel Beckett, for example, both reacted strongly against public recognition, making their work purposefully more obscure to undermine the ease with which they were being digested by the public.
But would we have been better off with a series of works more similar to The Dubliners and Waiting for Godot compared to their nearly impenetrable late-career works? We cannot say because there is no turning back from fame, and this is too bad, says Parks:
"Turmoil and dilemma once experienced with a certain desperation may be seen more complacently as the writer reflects that through expressing them he has realized his inevitable and well-deserved triumph."
The early modern world of Joyce and Beckett, however, no longer exists, and artists may be better for that, says "internet-famous" musician and songwriter Jonathan Coulton.
The internet can simultaneously give an artist a solid fan base while allowing him or her to remain anonymous in the community in which they live. And that's good for keeping them innocent, hungry, and humble:
Read more at The New York Review of Books.
Firefighters in California are still struggling to contain several wildfires nearly one week after they broke out.
- Hundreds of people are still missing after three wildfires spread across Northern and Southern California last week.
- 48 of the 50 deaths occurred after the Camp Fire blazed through the town of Paradise, north of Sacramento.
- On Tuesday night, a fourth wildfire broke out, though it's mostly contained.
We know the dangers of too little sleep. Now for the other side of the story.
- Western University researchers found that sleeping over eight hours per night results in cognitive decline.
- Oversleepers suffer similar difficulties on certain cognitive tests as those who sleep under seven hours.
- Not all the news is bad: One night of oversleeping results in a cognitive boost.
Protected animals are feared to be headed for the black market.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.