How the NBA Can Become a Biometrics Battlefield
Data and tech are invading sports arenas at a relentless pace with major emphasis being placed on advanced metrics. On one hand, incorporating new information can help revolutionize a sport. On the other, invasive testing could instigate a conflict between executives and athletes.
ESPN The Magazine writers Pablo S. Torre and Tom Habserstroh have a terrific article on the NBA and biometrics appearing in print later this month. Luckily, it's available for all to read right now over at ABC. It's chock full of fascinating information about how newly evolved technologies and data collection tactics have rapidly invaded basketball (as well as other sports), ruffling quite a few feathers along the way.
The NBA is a unique biometrics battlefield because no other major professional league has as much invested in technology as it does. It may be surprising to learn that one in three majority owners of NBA franchises made their fortunes in the tech industry. Now those same executives are taking the strategies that paid such massive dividends before and re-applying them to the business of basketball. As Torre and Haberstroh explain, these new approaches aren't going to sit well with everyone:
"But what might come as a surprise is how significant that explosion has been, and how far its blast radius might soon reach. The literary specter haunting sports' burgeoning Information Age is no longer Michael Lewis and Moneyball but George Orwell and 1984."
The authors suspect the NBA Players Association will soon fight back against team directives to monitor players' personal activity. It's one thing to track them while they're on the court. It's a whole other to keep tabs on them at home or when they go out. But NBA executives aren't waiting for the Players Association's permission to invest in items such as wearable GPS systems:
"To front offices, the upside of such devices is rather obvious: Players, like Formula One cars, are luxury machines that perform best if vigilantly monitored, regulated and rested."
Read the article (linked below) and let us know what you think.
Read more at ABC
Photo credit: S.Pytel / Shutterstock
Could this be the long-awaited solution to economic inequality?
Under capitalism, the argument goes, it's every man for himself. Through the relentless pursuit of self-interest, everyone benefits, as if an invisible hand were guiding each of us toward the common good. Everyone should accordingly try to get as much as they can, not only for their goods but also for their labour. Whatever the market price is is, in turn, what the buyer should pay. Just like the idea that there should be a minimum wage, the idea that there should be a maximum wage seems to undermine the very freedom that the free market is supposed to guarantee.
Humans evolved to live in the cold through a number of environmental and genetic factors.
- According to some relatively new research, many of our early human cousins preceded Homo sapien migrations north by hundreds of thousands or even millions of years.
- Cross-breeding with other ancient hominids gave some subsets of human population the genes to contend and thrive in colder and harsher climates.
- Behavioral and dietary changes also helped humans adapt to cold climates.
It's unlikely that there's anything on the planet that is worth the cost of shipping it back
- In the second season of National Geographic Channel's MARS (premiering tonight, 11/12/18,) privatized miners on the red planet clash with a colony of international scientists
- Privatized mining on both Mars and the Moon is likely to occur in the next century
- The cost of returning mined materials from Space to the Earth will probably be too high to create a self-sustaining industry, but the resources may have other uses at their origin points
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.