Skip to content
Guest Thinkers

Response to Sa’dah

The main consultant who worked on the ICG report on Sa’dah sent me this thoughtful response to my post earlier today:

Regarding the fact that the report considers the Saada conflict the most “deadly and dangerous”, it is my own personal analysis, not what the government thinks. Deadly, undoubtedly: how many people have died in the South since the movements started? In Saada, although there are no trustworthy estimates, it might more or less be a hundred times more…

Dangerous in the sense that the South is in a way peripheral while if there is a spill-over of the Saada conflict with tribes in Amran fighting, groups in Marib, al-Jawf and Dhamar joining in, the heart of
the regime is touched and this can be really messy.

On the rehabilitation, you know better than I do how al-Hitar’s communication was not always consistent. On turning the Huthis into a party, I agree that it would be difficult but we shouldn’t underestimate the capacity of the group to evolve. Abd al-Malik has his own strategy, one that is different from Yahya’s and different from Husayn’s. So God knows what they might do: once again, I don’t see it as a matter of ideology but more as a matter of political opportunities.


Related
Late last week Frank Cilluffo and Clint Watts released a policy brief from George Washington University’s Homeland Security Policy Institute entitled “Yemen and al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula: Exploiting a […]
As I have skimmed through the Wikileaks documents coming out of San’a and Riyadh I have been asking myself a number of different questions here are three (I promise some […]
I read the ICG’s most recent report on Yemen: Defusing the Saada Time Bomb this morning, and despite my quibbles with its transliteration, I was quite impressed with the report. […]

Up Next
You heard it here first. The new issue of Sada al-Malahim should be out soon. Of great curiosity this time will be whether or not the organization addresses al-Awfi’s confessions, […]