Skip to content
Guest Thinkers

Is this still a thing?

Sign up for the Smarter Faster newsletter
A weekly newsletter featuring the biggest ideas from the smartest people

The following comes from Greg Miller’s article in the Washington Post on the second issue of Inspire:

The publication notes with evident pride that AQAP, as the group is known, has come to be seen by CIA analysts as the most potent of al-Qaeda’s affiliates. A key reason is the involvement in the group of Anwar al-Aulaqi, a U.S.-born cleric who speaks fluent English and was tied to the Fort Hood and Christmas Day airline attacks.”

Is this really still widely believed? Do people think that if Anwar al-Awlaqi wasn’t in AQAP then the organization wouldn’t be such a threat?

I certainly hope not, as assumptions like that lead to the mistaken belief that assassinating al-Awlaqi would somehow eliminate or greatly reduce the threat of a strike from AQAP and that, as we say in Nebraska and probably other places, is just lazy wishful thinking.

Sign up for the Smarter Faster newsletter
A weekly newsletter featuring the biggest ideas from the smartest people

Related
On December 23 – the same day the US carried out an apparent drone strike in the al-Baydha governorate of Yemen, apparently targeting ‘Abd al-Rauf al-Dhahab – AQAP released a […]
This week the Washington Post published a three-part series it entitled “Permanent War.”  The first piece, by Greg Miller, talks about the disposition matrix and sets the stage for the […]

Up Next
Given some of the comments that have shown up on the blog over the past few days, Waq al-waq has decided to disallow anonymous comments. While we encourage different views […]