Can (or Should) We Patent Nature?
Writing for a unanimous Supreme Court majority, Justice Clarence Thomas argued that Myriad Genetics Inc. did not invent anything when it isolated two genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2.
Sign up for the Smarter Faster newsletter
A weekly newsletter featuring the biggest ideas from the smartest people
Writing for a unanimous Supreme Court majority, Justice Clarence Thomas argued that Myriad Genetics Inc. did not invent anything when it isolated two genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, which can be used to indicate if a woman is at risk of developing breast cancer or ovarian cancer.
“To be sure, [Myriad] found an important and useful gene,” Thomas wrote, “but separating that gene from its surrounding genetic material is not an act of invention.”
Therefore, Myriad was not eligible for patents. Mother Nature seems to have a better patent claim.
What do you think?
Can (or Should) We Patent Nature?
Sign up for the Smarter Faster newsletter
A weekly newsletter featuring the biggest ideas from the smartest people
