A Little Touch Goes a Long Way: How Touch Influences Perception and Choice
Touch has always played an important role in our development and in our tendency to make certain judgments and take certain risks.
Maria Konnikova is the New York Times bestselling author of The Confidence Game (Viking/Penguin 2016) and Mastermind: How to Think Like Sherlock Holmes (Viking/Penguin, 2013). She is a contributing writer for The New Yorker, where she writes a regular column with a focus on psychology and culture, and her writing has appeared in The Atlantic, The New York Times, California Sunday, Pacific Standard, The New Republic, WIRED, and The Smithsonian, among numerous other publications. Maria is a recipient of the 2015 Harvard Medical School Media Fellowship, and is a Schachter Writing Fellow at Columbia University’s Motivation Science Center. She formerly wrote the “Literally Psyched” column for Scientific American and the popular psychology blog “Artful Choice” for Big Think. She graduated magna cum laude from Harvard University, where she studied psychology, creative writing, and government, and received her Ph.D. in Psychology from Columbia University.
A few months ago, I wrote about the ability of smell to regularly influence our choices, often without any awareness on our part. But smell is not the only culprit. Indeed, one of the senses that can most drastically influence our perceptions and our decisions, also without our being aware of the effect, happens to be a sense many of us tend to forget we even have: touch.
Touch can affect our perception of other people
Consider this scenario: You are walking to take part in a psychology experiment. The experimenter greets you in the lobby and walks you to the elevator. In the elevator, he asks you to hold his cup of coffee for a second while he writes down your name and the time of participation. He then takes the cup back and you proceed to the room where the experiment will be held. Your task: read through a packet that contains an impression of an individual—he is intelligent, skillful, industrious, determined, practical, and cautious—and then rate that individual on several bi-polar scales (that is, scales where one trait forms one end and its opposite, the other). How warm of a person does the individual appear to be, in your judgment?
When participants submitted their ratings, a significant difference was found: those who had held a cup of hot coffee rated the individual as significantly warmer than those who had held a cup of iced coffee. No other personality ratings were affected by the difference in coffee temperature.
What was going on? For those who had touched the steaming coffee, the heat not only warmed up their hands, but also subconsciously activated concepts and feelings of warmth—as in a personal quality. To them, unknown people then appeared to be nicer, warmer human beings than they did to their cold-coffee counterparts, even though the two descriptions were identical. Here, then, is a case of touch—specifically, warmth perception—actually influencing how we perceive the people around us. The effect is there, whether we know it or not and whether we believe in it or not.
Touch can affect our risk preferences
But beyond world perception, touch can also influence our actual decisions. In the above study, a follow-up experiment showed that individuals who had held a hot versus warm therapeutic pad (they were told they were evaluating the product) were more likely to choose a gift for a friend than accepting one for themselves. And in a completely unrelated study, touch was shown to have even more far-reaching consequences: it could make someone take greater risk than they otherwise would.
In a series of experiments, a group of business students was first instructed on the rules for a gambling game, where on each round, they could either take a certain monetary payoff or a gamble that offered a 50% chance of winning or a 50% chance of getting nothing. However, how these instructions were given differed from student to student: while half of the students were just told the rules of the game, the other half also received a light pat on the shoulder by the female experimenter (note that gender does matter here—the researchers were mimicking the maternal touch, an important factor in child development and early willingness to take risks; see below).
When the researchers examined the choices that the participants had made, they found that those who had received the pat on the shoulder were much more likely to take the riskier choices than those who hadn’t. Touch, it seems, made them feel more secure, which in turn influenced their willingness to take a financial risk. A follow-up study actually looked at feelings of security, and found that they did indeed mediate the willingness to take a risk.
In future studies, however, it was determined that the touch effect did not hold at all when the experimenter was male, and was attenuated when the touch in question was a handshake, not a pat on the back (the handshake did influence behavior—just not as greatly). So, there are definitely limits to the power of touch to affect choice. Not every physical contact will make a difference – but in the right circumstances, the effects are profound.
Touch has an important developmental role – but the effects last into adulthood
If we think of these findings in evolutionary and developmental terms, they make a great deal of sense. As early as the 1950s, Harry Harlow demonstrated that macaque monkeys formed attachment to a mother doll who was covered in soft cloth, but not to one that was made of wire mesh. Indeed, they would choose the soft over the hard “mother” even when the latter was the one that offered them food. Harlow posited that the effect was due to the importance of physical contact between mother and child in generating feelings of security. Once secure, an animal is more likely to explore his environment and to engage with unfamiliar surroundings. But absent that contact, the opposite happens: an infant, whether monkey or human, becomes more fearful and withdrawn.
Touch, then, has always played an important role in our development and in our tendency to make certain judgments and take certain risks. But what we are less aware of is that it continues to do so long after the early developmental stage is left behind. The effects can be both positive and negative—but whatever they are, they are more likely than not to remain below our radar, outside of conscious awareness. So next time you make a judgment about your feelings toward someone (are they a nice person? A distant one?) or are thinking about doing something that involves some risk, ask yourself: is it really me speaking – or is it the power of an incidental touch?
If you'd like to receive information on new posts and other updates, follow Maria on Twitter @mkonnikova
[Photo credit: Creative Commons, from Dantes flickr photostream]
The ability to speak clearly, succinctly, and powerfully is easier than you think
The ability to communicate effectively can make or break a person's assessment of your intelligence, competence, and authenticity.
The results come from a 15-year study that used ultrasound scans to track blood vessels in middle-aged adults starting in 2002.
- The study measured the stiffness of blood vessels in middle-aged patients over time.
- Stiff blood vessels can lead to the destruction of delicate blood vessels in the brain, which can contribute to cognitive decline.
- The scans could someday become a widely used tool to identify people at high risk of developing dementia and Alzheimer's.
What defines a dark horse? The all-important decision to pursue fulfillment and excellence.
When we first set the Dark Horse Project in motion, fulfillment was the last thing on our minds. We were hoping to uncover specific and possibly idiosyncratic study methods, learning techniques, and rehearsal regimes that dark horses used to attain excellence. Our training made us resistant to ambiguous variables that were difficult to quantify, and personal fulfillment seemed downright foggy. But our training also taught us never to ignore the evidence, no matter how much it violated our expectations.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.