23 responses to 23 awful statements made to childfree people
There appears to be a bizarre stigma around people – especially women – who voluntarily decide not to procreate.
There appears to be a bizarre stigma around people – especially women – who voluntarily decide not to procreate. I asked my Twitter followers what kinds of reactions they received and got some expected answers. The Huffington Post did the same (twice) and obviously had a much bigger pool. I want to examine these responses, curated by the HuffPo, and offer responses to these harsh claims that reinforce an unnecessary stigma.
(Though the HuffPo article are directed at women, specifically, I hope you don’t view this as me speaking for or on behalf of women. This is to do with all childfree people, in general, though women appear to receive the harshest due to being nothing but baby-factories, in many people’s eyes.)
Here are my responses.
1. "What a bad decision."
According to what measure of “bad”? You simply declaring something bad doesn’t make it so – nor is it “bad” just because you disagree with the decision.
(If this person can give a reasonable argument – justified and ethical – for why you should have children, do let me know. I’ve not encountered a good reason for procreation – and very good reasons not to.)
2. "Now that I have children, my life has true meaning!"
So before you had kids, it had no meaning? I’m sad to hear that. But that surely can’t be true. Similarly, your life isn’t my life: We all find meaning in different ways. Mine, for example, is partially about critiquing terrible arguments or sentiments.
Also, you might as well declare your love of chocolate, for all the worth this sentiment has on childfree people. This is an autiobiographical exclamation.
3. "You're a crazy cat lady in training."
I take offence to that. I am not “in training”.
Also: so what?
4. "You think you're tired? You don't know what tired is."
Very glad to know you have a magic meter than can measure “tiredness”. Also, I’m glad this is a competition.
5. "You're being selfish."
Huh? For deciding what to do with my body parts and my life? For not caring about non-existent children? What?
(For women, I believe this about “denying” your partner, I think, the right to access your uterus whenever s/he wants. Or you are selfishly keeping a magical baby away from someone? I don’t know. It’s a popular but never explained response.)
6. "You'll change your mind when you meet the right man."
Probably not, as I’m not that interested in men and it wouldn’t biologically work out – and even surrogacy and adoption isn’t an option. Also, just because I meet someone doesn’t make it right. Your scary Nostradamus crystal-ball gazing isn’t a justification.
Also, unless my partner is very rich, it simply makes no sense for me to look after a child – even ignoring the biological aspect.
7. "What are you waiting for?"
Right now? For the kettle to boil. But, assuming I wanted a child, it would be about waiting for financial and home security and ascertaining I could accommodate a child.
But I don’t want a child - so asking why I am waiting for what I explicitly have stated I don’t want is illogical.
8. "Your mom had you!"
Thanks for that fascinating lesson in biology. We both regret that, as do many Internet commenters.
9. "You're missing out on one of the best things in life."
According to who? Shall I show you the endless studies indicating unhappiness in becoming a parent? Shall I indicate the number of parents who are honest about regretting being parents? How about all those who can’t afford a child and thus end up regretting the child and make his/her life worse?
10 "Tick tock."
Is the kettle finished boiling? Why are we making object noises?
11. "It's a mom thing."
Having children is a “mom thing”? Er, I’d think so. (Also, sometimes there are dads, too.)
12. "That's a shame. You might regret it."
13. "What's wrong with you?"
A lot: What specifically do you mean? You mean why am I not giving into social pressure to pump out endless numbers of babies? Yes: clearly there’s a problem with me.
14. "The size of that house and just the two of you? It's a waste of space."
Cats and books fill up things just fine.
Also: what an awful reason to have kids. To fill space? Yikes.
15. "But you would be such a great mom!"
But even if I would be a great, er, parent, that doesn’t mean I should breed. It just means I should raise kids. Which means I can do that for existing children.
Yet, that's still not a reason to be a (good) parent – for example, I don’t make enough money to even support myself comfortably.
16. "Just find a donor and have kids. I'll babysit."
If you want kids to look after so much, find a donor yourself. Or, better, adopt an existing child.
17. "You think you don't want children, but once you have them you'll change your mind."
Dear god, the sheer broken logic in that assertion makes me wonder how often reason bleeds when travelling through your mind.
18. "Don't wait too long."
But I don’t want kids.
19. "You'd better hurry up and give your husband a child before he finds someone who will."
Wow, then that’s a test of a what crappy husband he is. If he only wants me for my uterus (I mean, if I had one), then he can find a uterus with legs somewhere else - but he'll probably find that none exist when there's a person attached to it.
20. "You don't have children, so you won't understand."
You don’t not have children, so you won’t understand.
Not very persuasive, is it?
21. "You don't know what real love is."
Oh really? Please tell me. Also, please do tell this to the numerous abused, abandoned, isolated, dying, starving, lonely, hurt, broken, rejected, molested, beaten, bruised children who are made so by the hands of their parents.
I hope you’ll use the same instrument to tell me about love that measures “true tiredness”.
22. "Wait until your biological clock kicks in."
I believe it kicked in the day my mother gave birth to me. You remember that fact don’t you? You reminded me of it earlier.
23. "Aren't you worried there'll be no one to look after you when you're old?
Yes, all those abandoned, lonely elderly folk are all childless.
HuffPo had a related follow-up: “12 Questions Childfree Women Don't Want To Hear”
Here’re my answers.
1. "Who will take care of you when you get old?"
People I pay.
2. "So you hate people?"
Yes: my efforts at not increasing the population, advocating adoption of existing children, etc. are all anchored in hating the species.
If I truly hated this species, I’d be spawning.
3. "Do you only think of yourself?"
See previous answer: It’s precisely that I’m not which underscores my decision. There exist children needing homes and there are plenty of people in the world. What makes me so damn special?
4. "What will you do with your life?"
Lots of things, I hope.
5. "Is it because you don't want to pass your genes on to someone else?"
Don’t really care about my genes, as long as they keep me healthy and alive.
6. "Won't your [partner] leave you when [they] find out?"
If she does, then she’s not a partner I should be with. Having kids should be one of the first discussions you have. (And "they" don’t need to “find out”, she knows and agrees, but whatever.)
7. "Are you even a woman?"
I am not. But if you asked a woman that question, I’d be wondering what kind of person you are – let alone what kind of parent you are.
8. "You don't want them or can't have them?"
Considering this is under the view of voluntary, I assume the former. If it was the latter, that would be a personal matter – though I see no reason why infertility should be something to be ashamed about, it still isn’t my business to “out” someone as being infertile, nor is it yours.
9. "You're just being selfish. Who's going to give me grandchildren?"
If you wanted my left hand, should I give that too? If I refused, would that be selfish – due to me making decisions about what to do with my body and life? If it’s not selfish to have control over my own body and life, then this nonsense assertion must cease.
10. "Are you sure [your partner] is okay with that?"
If she wasn’t, I’d hope to know. That would not be a relationship to be in. And it’s not dependent on what my partner wants, but what we both want and can reasonably afford, do, etc., with our lives and current income status.
11. "How can you ever hope to be a family?"
Who says I want one? Or, rather: Who says my friends and current partner(s) aren’t enough?
12. "That's what we were put on earth to do. Have children and love them, what else do you want from life if you don't have that?"
"Put" on Earth? I was born here. And who says that's the reason?
What else do I want from life? To write, to read, to travel, to breathe in different countries; to sail, to dive, to fly, fall in love with different people from across the world; to study, to publish, to speak; to teach, to be loved by others, to be hated by more; to play games, buy new technology, save a life, care for abandoned cats; build a home, maintain it, learn about cars; conquer a new language, find a lover who only speaks it; swim with sharks, win a Nobel, write for the New York Times or Guardian; laugh at a million stupid things, hate everything Adam Sandler touches, create a comic book with an artist who is so gifted s/he takes my breath away; win my war against chronic pain, never walk with a cane, learn to run; get financial security, donate time to making people better in even a small way; learn how to sleep.
But yes. Kids. Totally. So much better to pump out babies.
Image Credit: Syda Productions / Shutterstock
Upvote/downvote each of the videos below!
As you vote, keep in mind that we are looking for a winner with the most engaging social venture pitch - an idea you would want to invest in.
Lumina Foundation and Big Think have partnered to bring this entrepreneurial competition to life, and we hope you'll participate! We have narrowed down the competition to four finalists and will be announcing an audience's choice award and a judges' choice award in May.
The creator of the winning video — chosen by Big Think's audience, the Lumina Foundation, and an independent panel of experts (bios below) — will be flown to New York for a taping in the Big Think studio as a way to further promote their vision for a new, disruptive idea in post-secondary education.
Thank you to all of the contestants who spent time submitting applications, and best of luck to our final four competitors.
Finalist: Greater Commons - Todd McLeod
Greater Commons, founded by Todd McLeod and Andrew Cull, is an organization that helps people live happier, more successful and fulfilling lives through agile learning. The current education system is inefficient and exclusionary, in which many students who end up earning a degree, if at all, enter a career not related to their field of study. Greater Commons solves this problem and gap in post-high school secondary education in a variety of ways. Passionately and diligently, Great Commons helps others obtain skills, knowledge, wisdom, motivation, and inspiration so that they may live better lives.
Finalist: PeerFoward - Keith Frome
PeerForward is an organization dedicated to increasing the education and career success rates of students in low-income schools and communities by mobilizing the power of positive peer influence. PeerForward works with partner schools to select influential students as a part of a team, systemizing the "peer effect." Research in the fields of sociology of schools, social-emotional learning, adult-youth partnerships, and civic education demonstrates that students can have a positive effect on the academic outcomes of their peers. PeerForward is unique through its systemic solutions to post-secondary education.
Finalist: Cogniss - Leon Young
Cogniss combines technology and best practice knowledge to enable anyone to innovate and share solutions that advance lifelong learning. Cogniss is the only platform to integrate neuroscience, through which it solves the problem of access by providing a low-code platform that enables both developers and non-developers to build sophisticated education apps fast, and at a much lower cost. It addresses the uneven quality of edtech solutions by embedding research-based learning design into its software. App creators can choose from a rich set of artificial intelligence, game, social and data analytics, and gamification to build their perfect customized solution.
Finalist: Practera - Nikki James
Practera's mission is to create a world where everyone can learn through experience. Today's workplaces are increasingly dynamic and diverse, however, costly and time-consuming experiential learning is not always able to offer the right opportunities at scale. Many students graduate without developing the essential skills for their chosen career. Practera's team of educators and technologists see this problem as an opportunity to transform the educational experience landscape, through a CPL pedagogical framework and opportunities to apply students' strengths through active feedback.
Thank you to our judges!
Our expert judges are Lorna Davis, Dan Rosensweig, and Stuart Yasgur.
Lorna Davis is the Senior Advisor to Danone CEO and is a Global Ambassador for the B Corp movement. Lorna has now joined B-Lab, the non-for-profit that supports the B Corporation movement on an assignment to support the journey of large multi nationals on the path to using business as a force of good.
Dan Rosensweig joined Chegg in 2010 with a vision for transforming the popular textbook rental service into a leading provider of digital learning services for high school and college students. As Chairman and CEO of Chegg, Dan commits the company to fulfilling its mission of putting students first and helping them save time, save money and get smarter.
Stuart Yasgur leads Ashoka's Social Financial Services globally. At Ashoka, Stuart works with others to initiate efforts that have mobilized more than $500 million in funding for social entrepreneurs, engaged the G20 through the Toronto, Seoul and Los Cabos summits and helped form partnerships with leading financial institutions and corporations.
Again, thank you to our incredible expert judges.
- A forensic artist in Scotland has made a hyper realistic model of an ancient dog.
- It was based on the skull of a dog dug up in Orkney, Scotland, which lived and died 4,000 years ago.
- The model gives us a glimpse of some of the first dogs humans befriended.
Some evidence attributes a certain neurological phenomenon to a near death experience.
Time of death is considered when a person has gone into cardiac arrest. This is the cessation of the electrical impulse that drive the heartbeat. As a result, the heart locks up. The moment the heart stops is considered time of death. But does death overtake our mind immediately afterward or does it slowly creep in?
- Beethovan and Picasso are the perfect examples for mastering the creative process.
- Behind each of their works are countless studies and sketches.
- The lesson? Never erase anything, keep iterating, and find new paths to familiar destinations.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.