'Upstreamism': Your zip code affects your health as much as genetics
Upstreamism advocate Rishi Manchanda calls us to understand health not as a "personal responsibility" but a "common good."
- Upstreamism tasks health care professionals to combat unhealthy social and cultural influences that exist outside — or upstream — of medical facilities.
- Patients from low-income neighborhoods are most at risk of negative health impacts.
- Thankfully, health care professionals are not alone. Upstreamism is increasingly part of our cultural consciousness.
If you encounter the word "miasma" today, it's probably in reference to the worst level of a popular video game. But as late as the 19th century, medical science treated such "bad air" seriously. Under the purview of miasma theory, doctors believed that epidemics of diseases such as cholera and bubonic plague originated from noxious air wafting from decaying, rotting flesh.
Enter John Snow. Mapping an 1854 outbreak of cholera, Snow discovered that the afflicted shared a common environmental link. They all secured water from a pump on Broad Street in Soho, London. Snow theorized it was the water, not the miasmatic air, that caused the outbreak. He removed the pump's handle, nullified the spread of the disease, and proved his theory accurate.
Because of this, Snow is widely considered the father of epidemiology. Michael J. Dowling, president and CEO of Northwell Health, offers an additional honorific. He cites Snow as a "classic upstreamist," one whose example is important to understanding our struggles with upstreamism today.
What is upstreamism?
Upstreamism is a call for health care professionals to recognize that many of the determinants affecting a patient's health exist outside the medical facility — that is, upstream of it.
A clinician can prescribe medicine or offer advice when the patient is in their practice, but consider how much time the average person spends in a hospital and the like. Very little. Instead, the vast majority of a patient's life is spent upstream, in their environment, where many mental and physical health issues can manifest and potentially worsen.
If a health care professional is to be an upstreamist, they must equip themselves to assess and address these social and cultural determinants together with a patient's symptoms.
Rishi Manchanda, founder of HealthBegins and upstreamism advocate, says that "one's zip code matters more than your genetic code." In fact, he points out, epigenetics shows us that our zip codes can shape our genetic codes.
In his TED talk, Manchanda illustrates upstreamism with an anecdote about a patient named Veronica. Veronica suffered chronic, debilitating headaches. She had visited emergency rooms three times before trying Manchanda's clinic. The previous doctors looked at Veronica's symptoms in isolation, saw nothing wrong, and prescribed standard pain medication.
He measured the same vital signs, got the same results, but asked an additional question: what were her living conditions like? Turns out, her living conditions weren't ideal. Her housing had mold, water leaks, and cockroaches. Manchanda theorized that her condition may be the result of an allergic reaction to the mold, a diagnosis the others missed because they only considered Veronica's symptoms in isolation. They forgot to look upstream.
Swimming against the social current?
Volunteers beautify a park in Bowie, MD, as part of a three-year project to repair low-income neighborhoods in the county. (Photo: Staff Sgt. Alexandre Montes/U.S. Air Force)
Like an actual river, a patient's upstream environment doesn't flow in a straight line. In lieu of springs, streams, headwaters, and tributaries, a patient's constitutional watershed contains their social environment, their physical environment, their economic status, their individual lifestyle, and their access to care.
As a result, people living in low-income neighborhoods face far more negative social and cultural health influences than those living in wealthier areas. Patients from such environments are less likely to have access to pollutant-free water, full-service grocery stores and farmers markets, and parks and playgrounds. The stress of such environments leads to higher rates of depression, unresponsive parenting practices, and even increased rates of mortality.
"If you're living in a very, very good neighborhood, […] you will live years longer than the person who lives in a very, very poor area, in general," Dowling said in an interview. "So if I want to improve your health, I've got to make sure that I have doctors, and nurses, etc., to provide medical care to you. But I've also got to figure out how to work on all of these other things."
Mapping the upstream
The challenges of upstreamism would be daunting to health care professionals if they had to face them alone. However, we are in the midst of social changes that will make upstreamism viable. One of those changes is an always connected world where new information is available quickly.
Going back to Veronica's story, Manchanda didn't solve the problem alone. He connected her with a community health worker, and the partnership paid off. The community worker found mold, a strain Veronica was allergic to. Once her home conditions improved, Veronica's quality of life did as well. Manchanda inadvertently helped one of her sons, too, as his asthma was exacerbated by the same mold.
"If we're all able to do this work, doctors and healthcare systems, payers and all of us together, we'll realize something about health. Health is not just a personal responsibility or phenomenon. Health is a common good," Manchanda said in his TED talk.
Beyond search engines, technology companies are making a big push for health care. The tools and innovations they develop could streamline the mapping of a patient's upstream environment. For example, devices like smartphones and Fitbits may allow patients to generate their own health records, offering doctors a proactive, up-to-date account of a patient's environment. The growing ubiquity of such devices will also allow doctors to perform virtual health visits, giving them easy access to patients and their live-in environment.
Finally, many health care professionals and organizations are heeding the upstreamist call to use their voices to advocate for changes to harmful social influences. As part of the Greater New York Hospital Association, Northwell Health has supported actions to curb gun violence in the United States. They advocate for, among other steps, a renewed ban on assault rifles, enhanced background checks, and permitting the CDC and NIH to conduct research on gun violence.
"[G]un violence isn't just a national tragedy, it's also a public health crisis," writes Dowling in his book Health Care Reboot.
This brings us back to John Snow. If he hadn't looked to the environment, looked upstream, he may have missed a solution that saved people's lives. The problems facing upstreamists today may require solutions more taxing than removing a water pump handle. But through technology and changes in social attitudes, they are manageable and can have a lasting impact on health care.
When it comes to getting at the truth, we have to be brave enough to have real conversations with one another.
- Universities are places where there academic freedom thrives. Such open exchange of ideas creates an environments conducive to civil discourse — dialog with one another with the goal of reaching the truth.
- Philanthropists should, ideally, provide resources to institutions that promote scholarly work. The reason for this is because such work benefits society at large.
- When you engage with people who don't agree with you, you learn how to understand viewpoints from different angles. The learning that takes place at these moments is often transformative, mind-expanding.
A federal court ruled that the state of Kentucky was wrong to deny a man's request for a personalized license plate reading "IM GOD." Here's why that's a win against atheist discrimination.
- After a three-year legal battle, a federal court last week cleared the way for a man in Kentucky to obtain a customized license plate declaring "IM GOD."
- The Kentucky Division of Motor Vehicles rejected the plate in 2016 claiming it violated the state's rule against religious messages on license plates.
- A state/church watchdog organization says the court's decision to approve the plate highlighted the bias the state of Kentucky was displaying toward religious non-believers.
After a three-year legal battle, a federal court last week cleared the way for a man in Kentucky to obtain a customized license plate declaring "IM GOD" after citing First Amendment rights after the state of Kentucky denied him the plate.
The message could be considered blasphemous and even "obscene or vulgar" as officials at the Kentucky Division of Motor Vehicles initially claimed when they rejected the plate in 2016. (The state later claimed that the plate wasn't approved because it was "not in good taste.") For Hart, a self-described atheist, it was a harmless, humorous message he had the right to display. So he filed a lawsuit.
Free Speech Rights
Photo Source: Public Domain Files
The lawsuit, filed by the Freedom From Religion Foundation and ACLU, challenged the Transportation Cabinet's denial of Hart's plate, which it argued was based on the state's required restrictions on license plate messages that communicate religious anti-religious, or political viewpoints. Essentially, it said that a license plate qualifies as government speech, so Hart's vanity plate didn't have free speech protections.
But the U.S. District Court for the Eastern Court of Kentucky, which resoundingly ruled in favor of Hart, said that the Commonwealth of Kentucky had gone too far. It concluded that the rule governing such license plates was an unreasonable and impermissible restriction of Hart's First Amendment rights. This was because of the inconsistency of the rule's application, which amounted to the state picking and choosing what kind of messages it wanted on the road regarding the topic of religion.
"The same year Mr. Hart was denied a plate reading 'IM GOD', the Transportation Cabinet approved the contradictory plates 'NOGAS', 'EATGAS', 'VEGAN', and 'BBQ4U' among many others," wrote U.S. District Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove in his decision. "Under the Transportation Cabinet's logic, the Commonwealth is not only contradicting itself, but spewing nonsense."
"If the Court finds that vanity plates are government speech, then the Court would also be finding that Kentucky has officially endorsed the words 'UDDER', 'BOOGR', 'JUICY', 'W8LOSS' and 'FATA55,'" he also noted, according to WDRB.
Win Against Religious Discrimination
According to the Freedom From Religion Foundation, a national state/church organization, the court's decision highlighted the bias the state of Kentucky was displaying toward religious non-believers.
"As the court affirmed, the denial of Ben Hart's choice of a license plate was pure discrimination," said FFRF Co-President Annie Laurie Gaylor in a press release.
Hart expressed gratitude for the court's ruling against that discrimination.
"I'm thankful to finally have the same opportunity to select a personal message for my license plate just as any other driver," said Hart in FFRF's press release. "There is nothing inappropriate about my view that religious beliefs are subject to individual interpretation."
This display of religious bias isn't surprising, and it likely isn't the first or only instance. Despite the increased visibility of atheists and the decline in religious beliefs in the United States, uncomfortable attitudes towards atheists are still prevalent. This makes the ruling all the more significant.
It might be just one silly license plate, but this case underlines how government officials are able to censor certain messages like those on license plates and determine whether they are, say, too blasphemous or too religious. Thanks to this ruling, those officials will have to check certain biases they have when giving a state stamp of approval to license plate messages. Aside from atheists or other religious minorities, this court decision is a win for anyone who might want to promote a viewpoint on government property without being censored because certain officials don't like the message.
According to FFRF attorney Pattrick Elliot in a "newsbite" by the nonprofit organization, it is particularly egregious for government workers to censor phrases on the topic of religion because it equates to them endorsing pro-religious or anti-religious messages. Now, thanks to this ruling, the state of Kentucky can't do that. And the rest of the nation has taken note.
WT:Social promises never to sell your data or run advertisements.
- The social media platform features a Facebook-style newsfeed, but content is prioritized by recency instead of engagement.
- Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales said he was inspired to create WT:Social because advertising had allowed "low-quality" content to dominate Facebook and Twitter.
- Facebook and Twitter have recently adopted opposing strategies in how to handle political advertising.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.