The Biggest Christian Hypocrisy

If the question of life or death resides in the hands of a deity, then the death penalty is a sin against that god. Yet if it’s in our own hands, a woman deciding whether or not to bring a child forth should not be made to feel guilty, or worse, that she herself has sinned.

Now that Dzokhar Tsarnaev has been found guilty on all 30 counts for his role in the Boston Marathon bombing, the next decision the jury makes might prove more difficult: life in prison or death. While that particular punishment was banned in Massachusetts in 1948, Tsarnaev was charged with federal, not state, crimes.


This isn’t a column on the merits or cruelty of the death penalty. However, Tsarnaev’s case got me thinking about one champion of that cause: Texas Governor Rick Perry.

As of last September, Texas had executed 278 prisoners in Perry’s first 14 years in office — he holds the record for overseeing the most executions for any U.S. governor, ever. Two years into his first term, in 2002, he vetoed a ban on killing mentally ill inmates.

He’s also quick to defend the current system of execution, which has been plagued with problems over the last few years — so much so that Utah reinstated death by firing squad. The American Pharmacist’s Association recently urged its members to discontinue providing execution drugs, which it says is against the goal of health care: providing life, not death.

Which leads to Perry’s elephant in the room, one that needs to be addressed by many of America’s religious: abortion. While Perry is quick to defend the death of adults, he’s mortified that fetuses would ever be terminated. Last July he cut the number of reproductive health facilities in Texas in half; now, due to a law requiring unnecessary renovations, that number could drop from 17 to seven — all, it should be noted, in more affluent areas, such as Dallas and Houston.

The economic reality of abortion is important for a reason. While no one wants to use abortion as birth control, the reality is that mistakes happen, regardless of economic circumstance. But when a pregnancy occurs to someone who cannot afford it, the chances that that child will suffer — economically, emotionally, physically — greatly increase. And we don’t have to debate the link between a lack of resources and the potentiality of eventual imprisonment. We have too many examples of that in our country today.

This is where the logic (or lack thereof) of anti-abortion activists has always failed: Force the mother to have the child, but don’t offer any support once it’s born. It’s a wicked system imagined by those who want to inject their religious beliefs on society without offering any actual empathy or charity to those in need.

Therein lies the hypocrisy: If all life is sacred and the domain of their god, how is it a human duty to kill anyone?

I am not defending the actions of murderers. Barring mental illness, which we have enough trouble as a society addressing — like senior citizens, we default to throwing them into clinics that don’t have the infrastructure or means to support them — there is a constant passing along of responsibility in this process. Troubled youth are put on pharmaceutical cocktails that exacerbate feelings of isolation and depression; social services are overstretched and underfunded. A lack of compassion surrounds the disturbed, the very quality that should be invoked in any religion.

That life that was so sacred in the womb becomes too big a burden to bear. Better to end it before its cancer destroys anything else. 

I’m honestly confused as I sit searching for an answer on Christian websites. The consensus seems to be that the unborn baby has not had a shot at life, while the death row inmate messed up big time. They earned their death. 

Turn what other cheek? 

Oh yes, an eye for an eye. 

Wait, that makes the whole world what? Never mind — Gandhi is no Matthew. 

And then there’s that whole thing about original sin floating around in the background. Once that sacred life breathes in the outside world, it has sinned. Perhaps that’s the rub: The only life that’s truly sacred is unborn. 

What a terrible way to live. 

If the question of life or death resides in the hands of a deity, then the death penalty is a sin against that god. Yet if it’s in our own hands, a woman deciding whether or not to bring a child forth should not be made to feel guilty, or worse, that she herself has sinned.

Until we can make sense of the world that we’ve created, I’m not sure how anything metaphysical will ever hold any meaning to anyone. We’ve always been making up the rules as we go along, but this one really has to be addressed. 

Image: Everett Historical / shutterstock.com

Ideology drives us apart. Neuroscience can bring us back together.

A guide to making difficult conversations possible—and peaceful—in an increasingly polarized nation.

Sponsored
  • How can we reach out to people on the other side of the divide? Get to know the other person as a human being before you get to know them as a set of tribal political beliefs, says Sarah Ruger. Don't launch straight into the difficult topics—connect on a more basic level first.
  • To bond, use icebreakers backed by neuroscience and psychology: Share a meal, watch some comedy, see awe-inspiring art, go on a tough hike together—sharing tribulation helps break down some of the mental barriers we have between us. Then, get down to talking, putting your humanity before your ideology.
  • The Charles Koch Foundation is committed to understanding what drives intolerance and the best ways to cure it. The foundation supports interdisciplinary research to overcome intolerance, new models for peaceful interactions, and experiments that can heal fractured communities. For more information, visit charleskochfoundation.org/courageous-collaborations.

How to split the USA into two countries: Red and Blue

Progressive America would be half as big, but twice as populated as its conservative twin.

Image: Dicken Schrader
Strange Maps
  • America's two political tribes have consolidated into 'red' and 'blue' nations, with seemingly irreconcilable differences.
  • Perhaps the best way to stop the infighting is to go for a divorce and give the two nations a country each
  • Based on the UN's partition plan for Israel/Palestine, this proposal provides territorial contiguity and sea access to both 'red' and 'blue' America
Keep reading Show less

Why a federal judge ordered White House to restore Jim Acosta's press badge

A federal judge ruled that the Trump administration likely violated the reporter's Fifth Amendment rights when it stripped his press credentials earlier this month.

WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 16: CNN chief White House correspondent Jim Acosta (R) returns to the White House with CNN Washington bureau chief Sam Feist after Federal judge Timothy J. Kelly ordered the White House to reinstate his press pass November 16, 2018 in Washington, DC. CNN has filed a lawsuit against the White House after Acosta's press pass was revoked after a dispute involving a news conference last week. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
Politics & Current Affairs
  • Acosta will be allowed to return to the White House on Friday.
  • The judge described the ruling as narrow, and didn't rule one way or the other on violations of the First Amendment.
  • The case is still open, and the administration may choose to appeal the ruling.
Keep reading Show less