The Biggest Christian Hypocrisy

If the question of life or death resides in the hands of a deity, then the death penalty is a sin against that god. Yet if it’s in our own hands, a woman deciding whether or not to bring a child forth should not be made to feel guilty, or worse, that she herself has sinned.

Now that Dzokhar Tsarnaev has been found guilty on all 30 counts for his role in the Boston Marathon bombing, the next decision the jury makes might prove more difficult: life in prison or death. While that particular punishment was banned in Massachusetts in 1948, Tsarnaev was charged with federal, not state, crimes.

This isn’t a column on the merits or cruelty of the death penalty. However, Tsarnaev’s case got me thinking about one champion of that cause: Texas Governor Rick Perry.

As of last September, Texas had executed 278 prisoners in Perry’s first 14 years in office — he holds the record for overseeing the most executions for any U.S. governor, ever. Two years into his first term, in 2002, he vetoed a ban on killing mentally ill inmates.

He’s also quick to defend the current system of execution, which has been plagued with problems over the last few years — so much so that Utah reinstated death by firing squad. The American Pharmacist’s Association recently urged its members to discontinue providing execution drugs, which it says is against the goal of health care: providing life, not death.

Which leads to Perry’s elephant in the room, one that needs to be addressed by many of America’s religious: abortion. While Perry is quick to defend the death of adults, he’s mortified that fetuses would ever be terminated. Last July he cut the number of reproductive health facilities in Texas in half; now, due to a law requiring unnecessary renovations, that number could drop from 17 to seven — all, it should be noted, in more affluent areas, such as Dallas and Houston.

The economic reality of abortion is important for a reason. While no one wants to use abortion as birth control, the reality is that mistakes happen, regardless of economic circumstance. But when a pregnancy occurs to someone who cannot afford it, the chances that that child will suffer — economically, emotionally, physically — greatly increase. And we don’t have to debate the link between a lack of resources and the potentiality of eventual imprisonment. We have too many examples of that in our country today.

This is where the logic (or lack thereof) of anti-abortion activists has always failed: Force the mother to have the child, but don’t offer any support once it’s born. It’s a wicked system imagined by those who want to inject their religious beliefs on society without offering any actual empathy or charity to those in need.

Therein lies the hypocrisy: If all life is sacred and the domain of their god, how is it a human duty to kill anyone?

I am not defending the actions of murderers. Barring mental illness, which we have enough trouble as a society addressing — like senior citizens, we default to throwing them into clinics that don’t have the infrastructure or means to support them — there is a constant passing along of responsibility in this process. Troubled youth are put on pharmaceutical cocktails that exacerbate feelings of isolation and depression; social services are overstretched and underfunded. A lack of compassion surrounds the disturbed, the very quality that should be invoked in any religion.

That life that was so sacred in the womb becomes too big a burden to bear. Better to end it before its cancer destroys anything else. 

I’m honestly confused as I sit searching for an answer on Christian websites. The consensus seems to be that the unborn baby has not had a shot at life, while the death row inmate messed up big time. They earned their death. 

Turn what other cheek? 

Oh yes, an eye for an eye. 

Wait, that makes the whole world what? Never mind — Gandhi is no Matthew. 

And then there’s that whole thing about original sin floating around in the background. Once that sacred life breathes in the outside world, it has sinned. Perhaps that’s the rub: The only life that’s truly sacred is unborn. 

What a terrible way to live. 

If the question of life or death resides in the hands of a deity, then the death penalty is a sin against that god. Yet if it’s in our own hands, a woman deciding whether or not to bring a child forth should not be made to feel guilty, or worse, that she herself has sinned.

Until we can make sense of the world that we’ve created, I’m not sure how anything metaphysical will ever hold any meaning to anyone. We’ve always been making up the rules as we go along, but this one really has to be addressed. 

Image: Everett Historical /

Big Think
Sponsored by Lumina Foundation

Upvote/downvote each of the videos below!

As you vote, keep in mind that we are looking for a winner with the most engaging social venture pitch - an idea you would want to invest in.

Lumina Foundation and Big Think have partnered to bring this entrepreneurial competition to life, and we hope you'll participate! We have narrowed down the competition to four finalists and will be announcing an audience's choice award and a judges' choice award in May.

The creator of the winning video — chosen by Big Think's audience, the Lumina Foundation, and an independent panel of experts (bios below) — will be flown to New York for a taping in the Big Think studio as a way to further promote their vision for a new, disruptive idea in post-secondary education.

Thank you to all of the contestants who spent time submitting applications, and best of luck to our final four competitors.

Finalist: Greater Commons - Todd McLeod

Greater Commons, founded by Todd McLeod and Andrew Cull, is an organization that helps people live happier, more successful and fulfilling lives through agile learning. The current education system is inefficient and exclusionary, in which many students who end up earning a degree, if at all, enter a career not related to their field of study. Greater Commons solves this problem and gap in post-high school secondary education in a variety of ways. Passionately and diligently, Great Commons helps others obtain skills, knowledge, wisdom, motivation, and inspiration so that they may live better lives.

Finalist: PeerFoward - Keith Frome

PeerForward is an organization dedicated to increasing the education and career success rates of students in low-income schools and communities by mobilizing the power of positive peer influence. PeerForward works with partner schools to select influential students as a part of a team, systemizing the "peer effect." Research in the fields of sociology of schools, social-emotional learning, adult-youth partnerships, and civic education demonstrates that students can have a positive effect on the academic outcomes of their peers. PeerForward is unique through its systemic solutions to post-secondary education.

Finalist: Cogniss - Leon Young

Cogniss combines technology and best practice knowledge to enable anyone to innovate and share solutions that advance lifelong learning. Cogniss is the only platform to integrate neuroscience, through which it solves the problem of access by providing a low-code platform that enables both developers and non-developers to build sophisticated education apps fast, and at a much lower cost. It addresses the uneven quality of edtech solutions by embedding research-based learning design into its software. App creators can choose from a rich set of artificial intelligence, game, social and data analytics, and gamification to build their perfect customized solution.

Finalist: Practera - Nikki James

Practera's mission is to create a world where everyone can learn through experience. Today's workplaces are increasingly dynamic and diverse, however, costly and time-consuming experiential learning is not always able to offer the right opportunities at scale. Many students graduate without developing the essential skills for their chosen career. Practera's team of educators and technologists see this problem as an opportunity to transform the educational experience landscape, through a CPL pedagogical framework and opportunities to apply students' strengths through active feedback.

Thank you to our judges!

Our expert judges are Lorna Davis, Dan Rosensweig, and Stuart Yasgur.

Lorna Davis is the Senior Advisor to Danone CEO and is a Global Ambassador for the B Corp movement. Lorna has now joined B-Lab, the non-for-profit that supports the B Corporation movement on an assignment to support the journey of large multi nationals on the path to using business as a force of good.

Dan Rosensweig joined Chegg in 2010 with a vision for transforming the popular textbook rental service into a leading provider of digital learning services for high school and college students. As Chairman and CEO of Chegg, Dan commits the company to fulfilling its mission of putting students first and helping them save time, save money and get smarter.

Stuart Yasgur leads Ashoka's Social Financial Services globally. At Ashoka, Stuart works with others to initiate efforts that have mobilized more than $500 million in funding for social entrepreneurs, engaged the G20 through the Toronto, Seoul and Los Cabos summits and helped form partnerships with leading financial institutions and corporations.

Again, thank you to our incredible expert judges.

  • Beethovan and Picasso are the perfect examples for mastering the creative process.
  • Behind each of their works are countless studies and sketches.
  • The lesson? Never erase anything, keep iterating, and find new paths to familiar destinations.

'Upstreamism': Your zip code affects your health as much as genetics

Upstreamism advocate Rishi Manchanda calls us to understand health not as a "personal responsibility" but a "common good."

Sponsored by Northwell Health
  • Upstreamism tasks health care professionals to combat unhealthy social and cultural influences that exist outside — or upstream — of medical facilities.
  • Patients from low-income neighborhoods are most at risk of negative health impacts.
  • Thankfully, health care professionals are not alone. Upstreamism is increasingly part of our cultural consciousness.
Keep reading Show less

Meet the Bajau sea nomads — they can reportedly hold their breath for 13 minutes

The Bajau people's nomadic lifestyle has given them remarkable adaptions, enabling them to stay underwater for unbelievable periods of time. Their lifestyle, however, is quickly disappearing.

Wikimedia Commons
Culture & Religion
  • The Bajau people travel in small flotillas throughout the Phillipines, Malaysia, and Indonesia, hunting fish underwater for food.
  • Over the years, practicing this lifestyle has given the Bajau unique adaptations to swimming underwater. Many find it straightforward to dive up to 13 minutes 200 feet below the surface of the ocean.
  • Unfortunately, many disparate factors are erasing the traditional Bajau way of life.
Keep reading Show less