Depression, schizophrenia, autism and other psychiatric disorders show common genetic link

A new study of over 700 human brains has shown a genetic "signature" for common psychiatric disorders. 

In his book The Gene, journalist and physician Siddhartha Mukherjee borrows Richard Dawkins’s description of genes not as 'blueprints' but 'recipes' that specify processes inside of our bodies, calling them 'formula for forms.' Our understanding of disease must now consider the most elementary of molecules, he continues. In order to wrap our heads around the nature of disease, scientists "must break the world into its constituent parts—genes, atoms, bytes—before making it whole again."

One of our great strengths as humans is our ability to recognize patterns, to break down the whole into its parts to better understand how it became whole in the first place. In medicine, this has led to errant diagnoses like when the Greek physician Hippocrates identified the four humors—the notion that all disease stems from one of four bodily fluids (though in fairness, autopsies were taboo when the Greek physician lived). While some patterns are highly speculative, we’re getting better at recognizing ones that matter.


A groundbreaking study recently published in the journal, Science, has discovered patterns of genetic activity that overlap with five major psychiatric disorders: alcoholism, autism, bipolar disorder, depression, and schizophrenia. This revelation could help researchers develop potential treatments for each of these diseases. For the first time, it also provides a physical basis for some of our most common disorders.

Analyzing data from the postmortem brain tissue of over seven hundred human brains, researchers found similar levels of certain molecules in those suffering from autism, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia. Further analysis found links between bipolar and depression, as well as depression and autism.

Network analysis identifies modules of coexpressed genes across disease. (Science)


The conditions show activation of astrocytes, star-shaped glial cells in the brain and spinal cord. Among their many functions, these cells provide biochemical support to the cells that help form the blood-brain barrier, provide nutrients to nervous tissue, and play a role in the repair and scarring of the brain and spinal cord after traumatic injuries. The 'signatures' researchers discovered in this study affect how brains cells communicate with one another.

Many disorders have physical characteristics that help define the problem. This has not been the case with psychiatric disorders. By identifying the gene expression of the above disorders, this new research could help create a physical checklist for doctors to use in future diagnoses.

Lead author Daniel Geschwind, a neurogeneticist at UCLA, says:

“We’re on the threshold to using genomics and molecular technology to look at [mental illness] in a way we’ve never been able to do before. Psychiatric disorders have no obvious pathology in the brain, but now we have the genomic tools to ask what actually goes awry in these brains.”

The researchers mention limitations in the study. Genetic variation, they write, is only one driver of expression variation. Environmental factors must be taken into consideration. But they did take precautions in their assessment. To counter against antipsychotic medication the volunteers might have been on before they died, the researchers gave PCP to nonhuman primates to evoke psychosis, then treated them with antipsychotic meds to observe the genetic activity.

Geschwind compares this research with genetic breakthroughs occurring in cancer studies. He calls this study a 'road map' to help in discovering the underlying mechanisms at the foundation of these seemingly disparate disorders. Instead of diagnosing patients on observation alone, for example, genetic testing could offer more precise analyses of potential conditions and treatments in the future.


Derek Beres is the author of Whole Motion and creator of Clarity: Anxiety Reduction for Optimal Health. Based in Los Angeles, he is working on a new book about spiritual consumerism. Stay in touch on Facebook and Twitter.

Algorithmic catastrophe: How news feeds reprogram your mind and habits

The most powerful editors in the world? Algorithms.

Sponsored by Charles Koch Foundation
  • According to a Pew Research poll, 45% of U.S. adults get at least some of their news from Facebook, with half of that amount using Facebook as their only news outlet.
  • Algorithms on social media pick what people read. There's worry that social media algorithms are creating filter bubbles, so that they never have to read something they don't agree with and thus cause tribal thinking and confirmation bias.
  • The Charles Koch Foundation is committed to understanding what drives intolerance and the best ways to cure it. The foundation supports interdisciplinary research to overcome intolerance, new models for peaceful interactions, and experiments that can heal fractured communities. For more information, visit
  • The opinions expressed in this video do not necessarily reflect the views of the Charles Koch Foundation, which encourages the expression of diverse viewpoints within a culture of civil discourse and mutual respect.
Keep reading Show less

Psychological gym experiment proves the power of mind over matter

It isn't mind over matter as much as mind properly working with matter.

DENVER, CO - MAY 16: Brian and Monica Folts workout on treadmills at Colorado Athletic Club Tabor Center on May 16, 2018 in Denver, Colorado. The couple runs marathons and compete in Ironman triathlons and train on on treadmills. (Photo by RJ Sangosti/The Denver Post via Getty Images)
Mind & Brain
  • A new Stanford study finds believing you have genetic predispositions for obesity and low exercise endurance changes your physiology.
  • Participants told they had a protective obesity gene had a better response than those told they did not, even if they did not actually have the gene.
  • Runners performed poorly after learning they did not have the gene for endurance, even if they actually have the gene.
Keep reading Show less

Why this 2015 NASA study is beloved by climate change skeptics

The findings of the controversial study flew in the face of past research on ice gains in Antarctica.

Politics & Current Affairs
  • A 2015 NASA study caused major controversy by claiming that Antarctica was gaining more ice than it was losing.
  • The study said that ice gains in East Antarctica were effectively canceling out ice losses in the western region of the continent.
  • Since 2015, multiple studies have shown that Antarctica is losing more ice than it's gaining, though the 2015 study remains a favorite of climate change doubters to this day.
Keep reading Show less