Is there a cure for pessimism?
Researchers at MIT believe they might have located the neural regions responsible for pessimism.
A simple drinking glass has been used for eons to gauge your personality type. Are you a pessimist? Half empty, obviously. Of course, making this a binary decision is part of the problem. The totality of your emotional response system cannot be weighed by judging a half of a glass.
Yet how we respond to the circumstances we encounter is telling. Optimism and pessimism are traits that in part define our reality. Being hopeful about the future is often the best path forward, though skeptics apply better critical thinking skills, helping them avert potential dangers. As with everything in life, balance is key.
That said, rampant pessimism underlies diseases of anxiety and depression. While there is no known cause (or cure) for such an outlook on life, researchers from MIT and Kyoto University decided to investigate whether a specific brain region can be implicated in fomenting pessimism. They believe they might have found it.
For the study, published in the journal, Neuron, researchers used approach-avoidance (Ap-Av) conflict on a group of macaques to identify neural regions involved in pessimistic decision making. The Ap-Av conflict test is a well-studied means for invoking anxious behavior; increased stress causes animals to choose higher-risk and higher-payoff options.
The research team, led by MIT’s McGovern Institute research affiliates Ken-ichi Amemori and Satoko Amemori, located the mechanism in the brain’s caudate nucleus (CN):
We here hypothesize that the primate CN could be causally involved in the generation of persistent and repetitive negative states, and that neural activity in the CN could exhibit specific features correlated with these states.
The CN is part of the striatum region, located in the dorsal striatum, alongside the putamen, which is known to regulate movement and influence certain types of learning. The striatum coordinates numerous aspects of cognition, most significantly motor and action planning, decision making, and reinforcement. It is also part of the brain’s reward network, where dopamine is a major player. The researchers identified this system as the main culprit in promoting pessimistic behavior:
Our findings suggest that local striatal circuits could be causal sources in producing persistent pessimistic states, and that striatal beta oscillation could be a neural correlate of the persistent states.
Pessimistic traits in humans cause ritualistic behavior. Whenever confronting a situation, the pessimist is likely to focus on the potential negative outcome. Though again, this could be helpful—for example, in financial decisions, or when weighing whether or not to date someone when you notice troubling signs of behavior. But this approach can also be crippling. The risk-averse rarely succeed in endeavors that call for a faith in one’s abilities; when you’re always choosing the negative outcome, it’s unlikely you’ll progress in your career or love.
Regions of the CN are linked to the limbic system, where your mood is regulated. Again, dopamine appears. When decisions are called for, pessimists were noticed to have specific brainwave activity in the CN that altered their behavior, which affected dopamine output. When the researchers purposefully suppressed dopamine activity in these regions, they noticed changes in the cost-benefit analysis of the macaques.
The surprisingly strong changes in evaluative decision-making that we have found by sub-cortical microstimulation, and the specificity of induction of long-lasting states of negative evaluation associated with selective beta-band patterning during decision-making, point to the striatum as a potentially powerful driver for the induction of mood changes including excessive and persistent pessimism.
Senior author of the study, MIT Institute Professor Ann Graybiel, says that the complexity of the systems requires a “delicate balance”:
There must be many circuits involved. But apparently we are so delicately balanced that just throwing the system off a little bit can rapidly change behavior.
The researchers hope this will help lead to breakthroughs in treating anxiety, depression, and obsessive-compulsive disorder, which also creates ritualistic behavior. If micro-stimulation can help the sufferer finally break the glass, they’ll no longer have to worry about how much liquid remains.
Malcolm Gladwell teaches "Get over yourself and get to work" for Big Think Edge.
- Learn to recognize failure and know the big difference between panicking and choking.
- At Big Think Edge, Malcolm Gladwell teaches how to check your inner critic and get clear on what failure is.
- Subscribe to Big Think Edge before we launch on March 30 to get 20% off monthly and annual memberships.
Can sensitive coral reefs survive another human generation?
- Coral reefs may not be able to survive another human decade because of the environmental stress we have placed on them, says author David Wallace-Wells. He posits that without meaningful changes to policies, the trend of them dying out, even in light of recent advances, will continue.
- The World Wildlife Fund says that 60 percent of all vertebrate mammals have died since just 1970. On top of this, recent studies suggest that insect populations may have fallen by as much as 75 percent over the last few decades.
- If it were not for our oceans, the planet would probably be already several degrees warmer than it is today due to the emissions we've expelled into the atmosphere.
They didn't know it, but the rituals of Iron Age Scandinavians turned their iron into steel.
- Iron Age Scandinavians only had access to poor quality iron, which put them at a tactical disadvantage against their neighbors.
- To strengthen their swords, smiths used the bones of their dead ancestors and animals, hoping to transfer the spirit into their blades.
- They couldn't have known that in so doing, they actually were forging a rudimentary form of steel.
Michael Dowling, Northwell Health's CEO, believes we're entering the age of smart medicine.
- The United States health care system has much room for improvement, and big tech may be laying the foundation for those improvements.
- Technological progress in medicine is coming from two fronts: medical technology and information technology.
- As information technology develops, patients will become active participants in their health care, and value-based care may become a reality.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.