Self-Motivation
David Goggins
Former Navy Seal
Career Development
Bryan Cranston
Actor
Critical Thinking
Liv Boeree
International Poker Champion
Emotional Intelligence
Amaryllis Fox
Former CIA Clandestine Operative
Management
Chris Hadfield
Retired Canadian Astronaut & Author
Learn
from the world's big
thinkers
Start Learning

Does Fasting Make You Smarter?

A new study in mice shows that fasting increases BDNF, a protein that promotes the growth of neuronal connections. 

A woman reads a book at the Medellin Book Fair on September 13, 2017. (Photo: Joaquin Sarmiento/AFP/Getty Images)


Like all diet trends, the current fasting craze is rooted in one part tradition (numerous religious rituals include fasting, though many were the result of resource management, not spiritual ambition), one part science, and many parts overinflated buzz. Metabolic changes associated with fasting predominantly end when the fast does, while the prospect of living in a perpetual state of fasting is not sustainable for most. As with many questions in nutrition, it leaves us wondering fasting’s actual benefits versus forgettable hyperbole.

Mark Mattson finds fasting satisfying. He has not eaten breakfast in 35 years. The Chief of the Laboratory of Neurosciences at the National Institute on Aging Intramural Research Program consumes 2,000 daily calories in a six-hour window, a practice called intermittent fasting that has grown especially popular in the paleo and ketosis communities. 

While Mattson’s daily 18-hour fast anecdotally serves him well, another intermittent fasting trend made famous by Jimmy Kimmel, the 5:2 diet, has soared in popularity. In this regimen you effectively eat whatever you want for five days a week—the wisdom of “whatever” being debatable, however—and restrict your calories to 500 on two of those days. Kimmel’s noticeable weight loss sent this diet into the Internet stratosphere. 

Most people begin either of these styles of intermittent fasting to shed pounds. Mattson, however, wanted to learn something else: Can fasting make you smarter? From his recent research into mice, the possibility is now being entertained. 

Mattson’s team studied forty mice. Both groups consumed the same number of calories over the course of the study, but one group took every other day off eating while the other group ate normally. The fasting group exhibited a 50 percent increase in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a protein that John J Ratey, associate clinical professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School, calls “Miracle-Gro for the brain” due to its role in promoting new neuronal connections. 

Whereas neurotransmitters carry out signaling, neurotrophins such as BDNF build and maintain the cell circuitry—the infrastructure itself. 

BDNF, Ratey continues, “nourishes neurons like fertilizer.” Since learning requires the strengthening of neuronal connections, the more BDNF that exists in your brain, the more likely those connections will be made. The more BDNF available through this process, the more likely those connections will stick as memory. 

Ratey discusses the role exercise has in promoting the growth of BDNF, an important phenomenon I covered in detail in my last book: training your body is just as important for your brain as anything we associate with physical health (such as weight loss). While the cultural emphasis on fitness has been movement, research has shown that, time and again, what you put into your body—or, as Mattson might argue, what you don’t put into your body—is the most relevant factor. 

The brain-body connection has become marketing fodder for ambitious health food companies for decades now, shifting with each new sliver of science. Plenty of misinformation regarding the “brain-boosting” effects of antioxidants and “superfoods” is out there. GT’s Kombucha is only one example of a company that had to remove such claims from their bottles; it was revealed that the company was also lying about its products’ sugar content. 

For most of history we ate food that was available and edible. The very definition of “food” has changed over the last century, since refrigeration and industrial processing completely altered our perception of what could go into our mouths. How we eat is as different today as what we eat. As Mattson told the NY Times, 

From an evolutionary perspective, it’s pretty clear that our ancestors did not eat three meals a day plus snacks. 

Will Mattson’s research on mice translate to us bipeds? The jury is out. One study that showed considerable increase in mice life span displayed a smaller effect in primates; benefits are not always transferable. But given the positive news of late about fasting, calorie restriction, and ketosis, it’s obvious that eating whenever you want, whatever you want isn’t working for our waistlines. The leap into our brain’s is not a far jump; more research into this possibility should be considered. 

--

Derek is the author of Whole Motion: Training Your Brain and Body For Optimal Health. Based in Los Angeles, he is working on a new book about spiritual consumerism. Stay in touch on Facebook and Twitter.

LIVE ON MONDAY | "Lights, camera, activism!" with Judith Light

Join multiple Tony and Emmy Award-winning actress Judith Light live on Big Think at 2 pm ET on Monday.

Big Think LIVE

Add event to calendar

AppleGoogleOffice 365OutlookOutlook.comYahoo

Keep reading Show less

Neom, Saudi Arabia's $500 billion megacity, reaches its next phase

Construction of the $500 billion dollar tech city-state of the future is moving ahead.

Credit: Neom
Technology & Innovation
  • The futuristic megacity Neom is being built in Saudi Arabia.
  • The city will be fully automated, leading in health, education and quality of life.
  • It will feature an artificial moon, cloud seeding, robotic gladiators and flying taxis.
Keep reading Show less

Your emotions are the new hot commodity — and there’s an app for that

Many of the most popular apps are about self-improvement.

Drew Angerer/Getty Images
Personal Growth

Emotions are the newest hot commodity, and we can't get enough.

Keep reading Show less

Study details the negative environmental impact of online shopping

Frequent shopping for single items adds to our carbon footprint.

A truck pulls out of a large Walmart regional distribution center on June 6, 2019 in Washington, Utah.

Photo by George Frey/Getty Images
Politics & Current Affairs
  • A new study shows e-commerce sites like Amazon leave larger greenhouse gas footprints than retail stores.
  • Ordering online from retail stores has an even smaller footprint than going to the store yourself.
  • Greening efforts by major e-commerce sites won't curb wasteful consumer habits. Consolidating online orders can make a difference.
Keep reading Show less
Future of Learning

The key to better quality education? Make students feel valued.

Building a personal connection with students can counteract some negative side effects of remote learning.

Scroll down to load more…
Quantcast