from the world's big
Whom do you want for President?
Dan Ariely is the James B Duke Professor of Psychology and Behavioral Economics at Duke University. He is the founder of The Center for Advanced Hindsight and co-founder of BEworks, which helps business leaders apply scientific thinking to their marketing and operational challenges. His books include Predictably Irrational and The Upside of Irrationality, both of which became New York Times best-sellers. as well as The Honest Truth about Dishonesty and his latest, Irrationally Yours.
Ariely publishes widely in the leading scholarly journals in economics, psychology, and business. His work has been featured in a variety of media including The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, Boston Globe, Business 2.0, Scientific American, Science and CNN.
Question: Whom do you want for President?\r\n
Dan Ariely: Well first I don’t want a rational candidate. I want a candidate who understands the irrationality of people. Again if you talk about healthcare or anything, I think you have to take people’s abilities and inabilities into consideration. And Obama looks to me like he’s the guy who understands people’s limitation to . . . in the best way right now. He’s also been using principles from behavioral economics more than anybody else. So he had one early approach in his campaign when he used the lottery. The lotteries are so interesting because the expected value is tiny, and people nevertheless flock to it. And Obama at an early point had a dinner. But instead of having a lot of people at the dinner, it was a lottery to have dinner with him alone. And I think he raised . . . I think it was like $8 million for one event, which is very successful. So I think he understands this better. So if I hope that there will ever be a behavioral economist on the economic council, I think he’s probably the best candidate to be willing to do that.\r\n
Question: Do we know enough about Obama?\r\n
Dan Ariely: Yeah I . . . There’s something that worries me about Obama, and that’s the fact that we don’t actually know much about him. And interestingly enough some of our research shows that when you don’t know something about somebody, you fill the gaps in an optimistic way. So if you think about all the excitement around Obama, it looks like he’s – outside of JFK – like the most amazing person that has the potential to be a president. Like if you would have a distribution of abilities, he would be like out there. How can it be that people expect so much? I mean we had a lot of presidents, a lot of good people in the past; but the expectations are so high. And I think part of the expectations being so high is because we know so little. The best way, by the way, to think about it is dating. If somebody tells you on an online dating site that they love music, people automatically assume they like the same music they do. Only later they meet them and they discover that’s not the case and they get disappointed. I think that’s one of the things that worries me about Obama, is that the expectations are so incredibly high. And they’re so incredibly high because they’re based on so little information.\r\n
Recorded on: Fep 19 2008\r\n
When we don't much about something, we fill in the gaps in an optimistic way, Ariely says.
Educators and administrators must build new supports for faculty and student success in a world where the classroom might become virtual in the blink of an eye.
- If you or someone you know is attending school remotely, you are more than likely learning through emergency remote instruction, which is not the same as online learning, write Rich DeMillo and Steve Harmon.
- Education institutions must properly define and understand the difference between a course that is designed from inception to be taught in an online format and a course that has been rapidly converted to be offered to remote students.
- In a future involving more online instruction than any of us ever imagined, it will be crucial to meticulously design factors like learner navigation, interactive recordings, feedback loops, exams and office hours in order to maximize learning potential within the virtual environment.
Placing science and religion at opposite ends of the belief spectrum is to ignore their unique purposes.
- Science and religion (fact versus faith) are often seen as two incongruous groups. When you consider the purpose of each and the questions that they seek to answer, the comparison becomes less black and white.
- This video features religious scholars, a primatologist, a neuroendocrinologist, a comedian, and other brilliant minds considering, among other things, the evolutionary function that religion serves, the power of symbols, and the human need to learn, explore, and know the world around us so that it becomes a less scary place.
- "I think most people are actually kind of comfortable with the idea that science is a reliable way to learn about nature, but it's not the whole story and there's a place also for religion, for faith, for theology, for philosophy," says Francis Collins, American geneticist and director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). "But that harmony perspective doesn't get as much attention. Nobody is as interested in harmony as they are in conflict."
Studying voice recordings of infected but asymptomatic people reveals potential indicators of Covid-19.
A leading British space scientist thinks there is life under the ice sheets of Europa.
- A British scientist named Professor Monica Grady recently came out in support of extraterrestrial life on Europa.
- Europa, the sixth largest moon in the solar system, may have favorable conditions for life under its miles of ice.
- The moon is one of Jupiter's 79.
Neil deGrasse Tyson wants to go ice fishing on Europa<div class="rm-shortcode" data-media_id="GLGsRX7e" data-player_id="FvQKszTI" data-rm-shortcode-id="f4790eb8f0515e036b24c4195299df28"> <div id="botr_GLGsRX7e_FvQKszTI_div" class="jwplayer-media" data-jwplayer-video-src="https://content.jwplatform.com/players/GLGsRX7e-FvQKszTI.js"> <img src="https://cdn.jwplayer.com/thumbs/GLGsRX7e-1920.jpg" class="jwplayer-media-preview" /> </div> <script src="https://content.jwplatform.com/players/GLGsRX7e-FvQKszTI.js"></script> </div>
Water Vapor Above Europa’s Surface Deteced for First Time<span style="display:block;position:relative;padding-top:56.25%;" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="9c4abc8473e1b89170cc8941beeb1f2d"><iframe type="lazy-iframe" data-runner-src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/WQ-E1lnSOzc?rel=0" width="100%" height="auto" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;"></iframe></span>
A study finds people are more influenced by what the other party says than their own. What gives?
- A new study has found evidence suggesting that conservative climate skepticism is driven by reactions to liberal support for science.
- This was determined both by comparing polling data to records of cues given by leaders, and through a survey.
- The findings could lead to new methods of influencing public opinion.