What the Public Needs to Know About Weight Management Surgery
Dr. Marc Bessler is assistant professor of surgery at Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and director of the Columbia University Center for Metabolic and Weight Loss Surgery. He is also the director of the Minimal Access Surgery Center at New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center. A fellow of the American College of Surgeons, Dr. Bessler's clinical specialties include surgical management of morbid obesity, gastroesophageal reflux disease, laparoscopic surgery of the stomach, esophagus and hernia surgery, and natural orifice surgery. His research interests focus on hormonal, oncologic, and immune responses in laparoscopy.
He earned his medical degree from New York University School of Medicine, and completed his residency in general surgery and his fellowship in surgical endoscopy at the Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and the Presbyterian Hospital in New York City.
Question: What are the biggest misperceptions about weight management surgery?
Marc Bessler: First of all I think the biggest misconception about overweight and obesity is that it’s the patient’s fault. This is truly a disease, now you’re right like we said before, you could eat less but that’s like telling somebody who has diabetes to control their sugar by just not taking in sugar and of course we tell 'em to do it but it’s very hard to do. Your body is mismanaging these things and so obesity is a disease, it is not the individual’s fault, it takes super human will power to keep obesity under control for the long term and that’s why these surgeries make sense. That these are very dangerous operations, I think 20 years ago the mortality rate of these operations were in excess of two percent. So of every hundred people that came in the operating room, two didn’t leave the hospital anyway, that’s not the case anymore. In a center of excellence, in a place that does this really well and a lot of it, the mortality rate for gastric bypass is about three in a thousan and the mortality rate for a lap band is less than one in a thousand. So these operations are much safer than they used to be. So much so that the risk associated with having the operation is way less than the risk of death from that operation over the ensuing years. Sorry, so much so that risk of having the operation is way less than the risk of having obesity for the ensuing years and you gain back not only the dollars put into it but the risk put into it over five years or so. Yet the other common misconception is that they always fail and people regain their weight back, some of the older operations didn’t work that well and some percentage of patients do gain weight back still but most don’t. With gastric bypass, I’d say 85 percent of patients maintain long term significant weight loss and with the lap band it’s probably close to the same just not as dramatic a weight loss.
Topic: Top experts working weight management surgery
Marc Bessler: Well that’s tough, I think that I hate to be specific about any institution, I think there’s centers of excellence, there’s two organizations that are documenting centers of excellence in weight loss surgery, that’s the American College of Surgeons and something called the surgical review corporation. A center that is documented as a center of excellence by those at least has more than the basics that they need to do this. A center that has one of these designations probably has long term follow up, so that’s really important and the surgeon’s probably have at least a minimum amount of experience doing this so that’s important. But truly you want somebody who’s done 500 or a thousand of these operations, the learning curve goes on probably to about 250 operations and then some. You want somebody who’s offering you all types of operations, not somebody who’s selling just one type or somebody who does 99 precent one type of operation because they’re probably trying to fit you into their operation, not find the best operation for you and you want some place that has a program for long term care and management and if you have all those three components you’re probably in a place that’s safe.
Question: What should the public know about weight management surgery?
Marc Bessler: Well I think that the most important thing to know is that right now less than two percent of people who qualify for surgery are having it. In most places that’s because patients really aren’t choosing it, I think there’s misconceptions about the risk and the benefits of this operation. These operations save lives, they make people have better quality of life, they make people healthier, they make people live longer. But there is some up front risk and you need to be at a center of excellence as we talked about, a place that does these really well to minimize that risk and overall the benefit is definitely there for almost everyone who qualifies for this operation and is appropriately evaluated. So I think that’s really, really important. The other important thing to know is that a lot of states, not New York fortunately but a lot of states the insurance companies don’t really allow patients to have these operations. The patients either have to fight, they get denied, they’re excluded from this and I think that’s really important. I think public health policy needs to be such that when things are medically necessary, when things are medically valuable, they aren’t denied patients and this is one area I think obesity in general is one area of sort of allowable discrimination because the public perception is still that obesity is the patient’s fault and if it’s the patient’s fault, we don’t have to pay money to give them an operation that isn’t gonna work anyway in their minds and that’s sort of the concept here. You wouldn’t hold back open heart surgery from somebody who has heart disease because they don’t eat a low fat diet and smoke. You have the operation and you educate them about proper diet and smoking, same thing here. You wouldn’t hold back a lung cancer operation from someone who has a history of smoking and we don’t hold back liver transplants from someone with a history of drinking, why, we recognize these as diseases with mortality associated with them and obesity is the same. Even more so, you don’t need to smoke to live, you don’t need to drink to live, but you need to eat to live. So you can go cold turkey off those other things, you can’t go cold turkey off food and really then it becomes a problem of regulation of amount, which is much harder than just stopping, you can’t stop eating therefore the disease is about regulation of the amount that you eat and that’s much, much harder to do.
Question: Insurance companies often do not cover weight management surgery: how can people afford it?
Marc Bessler: Well so how can people finance surgery, it’s two things, number one you can find an insurance company that does cover it, sometimes that’s a possibility, certain states almost everybody covers it. In New York it’s almost mandated, you’re right that obesity does disproportionately a bit effect the lower socioeconomic status, it’s unclear exactly why, perhaps fast food, things like that is more prevalent. There’s financing available through some institutions for this, so you can, you know, put it on a payment plan if you will. But again lower socioeconomic status folks, people who, you know, are relatively poor might not be able to afford a 20,000 or a $15,000 operation even paid off over time. I tell people who can somehow squeeze it together, you’ll put a car on financing even though you otherwise might be able to take mass transit because you want a car, 15 to $20,000 operation is affordable on financing if you recognize this is for your quality and length of life. Maybe more important than having a car in some ways. So I’m not telling people they should run out and pay for these operations if there’s other alternatives, certainly getting insurance to cover it, Medicare covers this at centers of excellence, Medicaid in New York covers it but not in all states and I think working to get legislation in those areas, working to make sure in the states that this isn’t routinely covered, to make sure that it is routinely covered is an important effort.
Recorded on: 6/16/08
Dr. Marc Bessler describes obesity as a disease, lists the best hospitals for surgery, and gives advice on how to afford the procedure.
What would happen if you tripled the US population? Join Matthew Yglesias and Charles Duhigg at 1pm ET on Monday, September 28.
Controversial physics theory says reality around us behaves like a computer neural network.
- Physicist proposes that the universe behaves like an artificial neural network.
- The scientist's new paper seeks to reconcile classical physics and quantum mechanics.
- The theory claims that natural selection produces both atoms and "observers".
Vanchurin interview:<span style="display:block;position:relative;padding-top:56.25%;" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="539759cbfd8fcd5b6ebf14a3b597b3f9"><iframe type="lazy-iframe" data-runner-src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/bmyRy2-UhEE?rel=0" width="100%" height="auto" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;"></iframe></span>
Vanchurin on “Hidden Phenomena”:<span style="display:block;position:relative;padding-top:56.25%;" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="18886ffd5e5840bb19d4494212f88d82"><iframe type="lazy-iframe" data-runner-src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/2NDVdNwsHCo?rel=0" width="100%" height="auto" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;"></iframe></span>Vitaly Vanchurin speaking at the 6th International FQXi Conference, "Mind Matters: Intelligence and Agency in the Physical World." The Foundational Questions...
Dominique Crenn, the only female chef in America with three Michelin stars, joins Big Think Live.
Having been exposed to mavericks in the French culinary world at a young age, three-star Michelin chef Dominique Crenn made it her mission to cook in a way that is not only delicious and elegant, but also expressive, memorable, and true to her experience.
43% of people think they can get a sense of someone's personality by their picture.
If you've used a dating app, you'll know the importance of choosing good profile pics.
The idea of 'absolute time' is an illusion. Physics and subjective experience reveal why.
- Since Einstein posited his theory of general relativity, we've understood that gravity has the power to warp space and time.
- This "time dilation" effect occurs even at small levels.
- Outside of physics, we experience distortions in how we perceive time — sometimes to a startling extent.
Physics without time<p>In his book "The Order of Time," Italian theoretical physicist Carlo Rovelli suggests that our perception of time — our sense that time is forever flowing forward — could be a highly subjective projection. After all, when you look at reality on the smallest scale (using equations of quantum gravity, at least), time vanishes.</p><p style="margin-left: 20px;">"If I observe the microscopic state of things," writes Rovelli, "then the difference between past and future vanishes … in the elementary grammar of things, there is no distinction between 'cause' and 'effect.'"</p><p>So, why do we perceive time as flowing <em>forward</em>? Rovelli notes that, although time disappears on extremely small scales, we still obviously perceive events occur sequentially in reality. In other words, we observe entropy: Order changing into disorder; an egg cracking and getting scrambled.</p><p>Rovelli says key aspects of time are described by the second law of thermodynamics, which states that heat always passes from hot to cold. This is a one-way street. For example, an ice cube melts into a hot cup of tea, never the reverse. Rovelli suggests a similar phenomenon might explain why we're only able to perceive the past and not the future.</p><p style="margin-left: 20px;">"Any time the future is definitely distinguishable from the past, there is something like heat involved," Rovelli wrote for the <a href="https://www.ft.com/content/ce6ef7b8-429a-11e8-93cf-67ac3a6482fd" target="_blank"><em>Financial Times</em></a>. "Thermodynamics traces the direction of time to something called the 'low entropy of the past', a still mysterious phenomenon on which discussions rage."</p>
The strange subjectivity of time<p>Time moves differently atop a mountain than it does on a beach. But you don't need to travel any distance at all to experience strange distortions in your perception of time. In moments of life-or-death fear, for example, your brain would release large amounts of adrenaline, which would speed up your internal clock, causing you to perceive the outside world as moving slowly.<br></p><p>Another common distortion occurs when we focus our attention in particular ways.</p><p style="margin-left: 20px;">"If you're thinking about how time is <em>currently</em> passing by, the biggest factor influencing your time perception is attention," Aaron Sackett, associate professor of marketing at the University of St. Thomas, told <em><a href="https://gizmodo.com/why-does-time-slow-down-and-speed-up-1840133782" target="_blank">Gizmodo</a></em>.<em> "</em>The more attention you give to the passage of time, the slower it tends to go. As you become distracted from time's passing—perhaps by something interesting happening nearby, or a good daydreaming session—you're more likely to lose track of time, giving you the feeling that it's slipping by more quickly than before. "Time flies when you're having fun," they say, but really, it's more like "time flies when you're thinking about other things." That's why time will also often fly by when you're definitely <em>not</em> having fun—like when you're having a heated argument or are terrified about an upcoming presentation."</p><p>One of the most mysterious ways people experience time-perception distortions is through psychedelic drugs. In an interview with <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/apr/14/carlo-rovelli-exploding-commonsense-notions-order-of-time-interview" target="_blank"><em>The Guardian</em></a>, Rovelli described a time he experimented with LSD.</p><p style="margin-left: 20px;">"It was an extraordinarily strong experience that touched me also intellectually," he said. "Among the strange phenomena was the sense of time stopping. Things were happening in my mind but the clock was not going ahead; the flow of time was not passing any more. It was a total subversion of the structure of reality."<br></p><p>It seems few scientists or philosophers believe time is completely an illusion.</p><p style="margin-left: 20px;">"What we call <em>time</em> is a rich, stratified concept; it has many layers," Rovelli told <em><a href="https://physicstoday.scitation.org/do/10.1063/PT.6.4.20190219a/full/" target="_blank">Physics Today</a>.</em> "Some of time's layers apply only at limited scales within limited domains. This does not make them illusions."</p>What <em>is</em> an illusion is the idea that time flows at an absolute rate. The river of time might be flowing forever forward, but it moves at different speeds, between people, and even within your own mind.
Quarantine rule breakers in 17th-century Italy partied all night – and some clergy condemned the feasting
17th-century outbreaks of plague in Italy reveal both tensions between religious and public health authorities.
Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, conflicts between religious freedom and public health regulations have been playing out in courts around the world.