We Should Be Able to Think Like Scientists
Question: How can scientists reach out to the public more effectively?
Lisa Randall: I think, I’ve obviously made the choice to speak to the public at some level and it’s in part because I enjoy writing and I enjoy being able to think creatively in different ways. I don’t think that any one particular scientist is obliged to do this, to speak to people. But I do think that as a community, if we are expecting resources, it’s very difficult material and I think it’s important that the information is out there.
When I wrote my book “Warped Passages,” I really had in mind an interested audience. I think it’s very easy to try to pander to a large audience – not easy, but – or to write technical things for your audience, but there’s sort of this in-between category of people where they’re really smart and really interested, but they just don’t know the physics yet, and I think it’s important that if they wanted to know what we’re doing and why it’s important and what the full implications are, then that information is out there in a way that they can access. And I just think, generally, it’s important to be able to communicate among different fields. We live in an era where science is important to the decisions we make. Is what happens at the LHC going to determine our policy toward it? Not necessarily, but being able to think like a scientist on some level we’ll be able to think about predictions and risk and probabilities. There’s some basic science training that might help people, but there’s also just curiosity about the world which everyone has and understanding why we care about these questions, what it is that we’re looking for and why it’s going to tell us these deep fundamental properties of the universe at both a small scale and the large scale. Scales that we can directly access just by looking, that we need technology for and saying what is it that we’re after? And I think those are – a lot of people want to know that, and it’s important that they have access to that information.
Recorded on February 17, 2010
Interviewed by Austin \r\nAllen
"We live in an era where science is important to the decisions we make," the Harvard physicist points out.
Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.
- The study compared personality traits and obesity views among more than 3,000 mothers.
- People who scored high in conscientiousness are more likely to experience "fat phobia.
The rise of anti-scientific thinking and conspiracy is a concerning trend.
- Fifty years later after one of the greatest achievements of mankind, there's a growing number of moon landing deniers. They are part of a larger trend of anti-scientific thinking.
- Climate change, anti-vaccination and other assorted conspiratorial mindsets are a detriment and show a tangible impediment to fostering real progress or societal change.
- All of these separate anti-scientific beliefs share a troubling root of intellectual dishonesty and ignorance.
- Henry Dunant's work led to the Red Cross and conventions on treating prisoners humanely.
- Amendments to the agreements reflect the modern world but have not been ratified by all countries.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.