Tom Freston: Iraq and the Media

Question: Does the media bear any responsibility for the war in Iraq?

Tom Freston:
Well I don’t know. I mean there’s a lot of responsibility to go around. You could say that the media had a case of a post 9/11 lapse of judgment and were maybe as fearful as what we might actually be involved with, or what might be coming that may have been the case; and that was a real national patriotism issue that may be more important than it actually was, and that leadership should not have been questioned. And where was the media? You know there were voices in the media who were telling the truth. There were politicians that were telling the truth. Maybe they weren’t getting as much coverage as others; but to blame the media is like you’re blaming some single blob when in fact it’s thousands of different voices. So maybe they didn’t do well . . . as well on this in aggregate as they have on some other issues, and it wasn’t as balanced. But I think that’s probably the case.

Recorded On: 7/6/07

Freston says there is plenty of responsibility to go around.

NASA astronomer Michelle Thaller on ​the multiple dimensions of space and human sexuality

Science and the squishiness of the human mind. The joys of wearing whatever the hell you want, and so much more.

Think Again Podcasts
  • Why can't we have a human-sized cat tree?
  • What would happen if you got a spoonful of a neutron star?
  • Why do we insist on dividing our wonderfully complex selves into boring little boxes
Keep reading Show less

How to split the USA into two countries: Red and Blue

Progressive America would be half as big, but twice as populated as its conservative twin.

Image: Dicken Schrader
Strange Maps
  • America's two political tribes have consolidated into 'red' and 'blue' nations, with seemingly irreconcilable differences.
  • Perhaps the best way to stop the infighting is to go for a divorce and give the two nations a country each
  • Based on the UN's partition plan for Israel/Palestine, this proposal provides territorial contiguity and sea access to both 'red' and 'blue' America
Keep reading Show less

Ideology drives us apart. Neuroscience can bring us back together.

A guide to making difficult conversations possible—and peaceful—in an increasingly polarized nation.

Sponsored
  • How can we reach out to people on the other side of the divide? Get to know the other person as a human being before you get to know them as a set of tribal political beliefs, says Sarah Ruger. Don't launch straight into the difficult topics—connect on a more basic level first.
  • To bond, use icebreakers backed by neuroscience and psychology: Share a meal, watch some comedy, see awe-inspiring art, go on a tough hike together—sharing tribulation helps break down some of the mental barriers we have between us. Then, get down to talking, putting your humanity before your ideology.
  • The Charles Koch Foundation is committed to understanding what drives intolerance and the best ways to cure it. The foundation supports interdisciplinary research to overcome intolerance, new models for peaceful interactions, and experiments that can heal fractured communities. For more information, visit charleskochfoundation.org/courageous-collaborations.