Tom Arnold’s Development Advice to the Obama Administration
At an earlier stage of his career, he worked for the European Commission on Agricultural Policy and on development programmes, representing the Commission for three years in the Ivory Coast and Malawi. Tom was Chairman of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s Committee of Agriculture (1993 – 1998). In 2003, he was appointed to the UN Millennium Project Hunger Task Force (2003 - 2004), established by Kofi Annan to devise a strategy to halve world hunger by 2015.
Tom was a member of the Irish Hunger Task Force (2007 - 2008), which was charged with proposing a strategy through which Ireland could make a distinctive contribution towards ending world hunger. He is a member of the International Food Policy Research Institute’s 2020 Advisory Council and the UN’s Central Emergency Response Fund’s Advisory Group.
At European level, he is chairman of the European Food Security Group, a network of 40 European NGOs engaged in food and hunger work and is Vice-chair of the Trans Atlantic Food Aid Dialogue – an alliance of American, European and Canadian NGOs working on the reform of international food aid.
Tom was recently appointed to the trust governing the Irish Times, Ireland’s leading newspaper and to the Irish government’s Commission on Taxation.
Tom Arnold is a graduate in Agricultural Economics from University College Dublin and has Masters Degrees from the Catholic University of Louvain and Trinity College Dublin.
Question: What should be the administration’s development priorities?
Arnold: I think one of the first things is that trying to make sure that development is part of that agenda, because it’s a very crowded agenda already. I mean, we’re facing a global financial crisis and the global economic crisis in its wake. We’re facing, you know, I think major issues around climate change, and obviously, then, there’s the various very intractable political problems. I mean, even places like, apart from the Middle East, which has been there all the time, areas like the India-Pakistan conflict, not conflict yet, but, I mean, the India-Pakistan situation, which is very difficult. So I think there is a challenge to make sure that the US focus on development issues is there as an important part of the new administration’s agenda. Now, I know that there’s a lot of very, I think, enlightened thinking has been going on within the US development community to take a really fresh look at how American efforts might be managed, resourced to best effect. The current US approach towards development is actually founded on the 1961 foreign assistance act. There’s been some very creative thinking going on about how that, a whole new look at that, a whole new legislative basis might be provided for that American assistance, and with that might come a look at the institutional underpinning of how the US goes about supporting its development assistance. So, there’s some of the challenges, I think, and hopefully that it would be consistent, I think, with what President-elect Obama has said, that he sees US development assistance as an important part of foreign policy, that he sees greater level of American engagement in a multi-lateral way as an important part of how US policy proceeds from here. And, in all of this, if you like, I would say the soft power that the development agenda can bring as a contributor to American foreign policy needs to be realized, needs to be acted upon and I hope it can be very, it can be effective. I would say, you know, about the outgoing administration, I mean, they’ve had a bad press, it’s no secret, in much of the rest of the world, but yet President Bush has, in some of, a number of the areas within the development area made some very positive things. I mean, the emphasis on HIV/AIDS that he gave, the whole area of focus on Africa and the increase in aid towards that. So, there is, even though the bad press was there at many other levels, there is an area, a platform, a foundation of solid achievement there which I think the incoming administration can build upon.
The CEO sets Obama’s development priorities.
New research links urban planning and political polarization.
- Canadian researchers find that excessive reliance on cars changes political views.
- Decades of car-centric urban planning normalized unsustainable lifestyles.
- People who prefer personal comfort elect politicians who represent such views.
Progressive America would be half as big, but twice as populated as its conservative twin.
- America's two political tribes have consolidated into 'red' and 'blue' nations, with seemingly irreconcilable differences.
- Perhaps the best way to stop the infighting is to go for a divorce and give the two nations a country each
- Based on the UN's partition plan for Israel/Palestine, this proposal provides territorial contiguity and sea access to both 'red' and 'blue' America
Science and the squishiness of the human mind. The joys of wearing whatever the hell you want, and so much more.
- Why can't we have a human-sized cat tree?
- What would happen if you got a spoonful of a neutron star?
- Why do we insist on dividing our wonderfully complex selves into boring little boxes
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.