The "Unwholesome" Side of MFA Programs
Question: What do you think of MFA programs?
Lionel Shriver: I'm very torn about them. I have to confess, I did get an MFA from Columbia University. And I can't say that I regret it exactly. I didn't have a bad time, I had some interesting teachers; I'm still in touch with one of them. And we've become friends. I am still friends with some of the students that I met at Columbia. My very best friend I met at Columbia. So it's a little mystifying why my immediate impulse is to diss MFA programs. But I sometimes feel in retrospect that I should have gotten a proper education in something like history, something substantive. If I'm going to be honest, what I really needed in my early 20s wasn't audience; I wasn't developed enough as a writer to be publishing. So I couldn't achieve that audience through getting short stories in The New Yorker. Frankly at this point in time, I'm still not getting short stories in The New Yorker. But I'm working on it.
So it is not a dumb thing for me to do. And therefore I can't really tell other people who were in a similar situation and have a similar need to have people read their work that they shouldn't do it. But it does have a kind of indulgent, middle-class gestalt. The grim truth is that most people who get MFAs will not go on to be professional writers and therefore when I've been on the other side of it and occasionally taught creative writing, I felt a little bit guilty because so many of the people that you should be encouraging, because there's no point to it if you're not encouraging, are not going to make it. And I think that's true across the board in the arts. My husband is a jazz drummer and he has the same sense of queasiness about teaching jazz drumming. There's more of a career in teaching jazz than there is in playing it right now, and so at the very best, most of the students are going to go on to become jazz instructors. So there's something a little corrupt in that, something unwholesome. And I share his discomfort in participating in it.
Recorded on March 12, 2010
While there is value to graduate writing degrees, so many of the young writers encouraged by their MFA professors aren't going to make it. This leaves Shriver uneasy.
The real Game of Thrones might be who best leverages the hit HBO show to shape political narratives.
- Sen. Elizabeth Warren argues that Game of Thrones is primarily about women in her review of the wildly popular HBO show.
- Warren also touches on other parallels between the show and our modern world, such as inequality, political favoritism of the elite, and the dire impact of different leadership styles on the lives of the people.
- Her review serves as another example of using Game of Thrones as a political analogy and a tool for framing political narratives.
Upstreamism advocate Rishi Manchanda calls us to understand health not as a "personal responsibility" but a "common good."
- Upstreamism tasks health care professionals to combat unhealthy social and cultural influences that exist outside — or upstream — of medical facilities.
- Patients from low-income neighborhoods are most at risk of negative health impacts.
- Thankfully, health care professionals are not alone. Upstreamism is increasingly part of our cultural consciousness.
- Climate change is no longer a financial problem, just a political one.
- Mitigating climate change by decarbonizing our economy would add trillions of dollars in new investments.
- Public attitudes toward climate change have shifted steadily in favor of action. Now it's up to elected leaders.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.