The President's Speech
Michael Waldman is a nationally prominent public interest lawyer, government official, teacher and writer. He became director of the Brennan Center in October 2005.
Mr. Waldman was Director of Speechwriting for President Bill Clinton from 1995-1999, serving as Assistant to the President. He was responsible for writing or editing nearly 2,000 speeches, including four State of the Union speeches and two Inaugural Addresses. Previously, he was Special Assistant to the President for Policy Coordination (1993-1995). Mr. Waldman was the top administration policy aide working on campaign finance reform, one of the Center's signature issues, and drafted the administration's public financing proposal.
He is the author of several books, including My Fellow Americans: The Most Important Speeches of American Presidents (Sourcebooks, 2003); POTUS Speaks: Finding the Words that Defined the Clinton Presidency (Simon & Schuster, 2000); and Who Robbed America? A Citizens' Guide to the Savings and Loan Scandal (Random House, 1990).
Prior to his government service, Mr. Waldman was the director of Public Citizen's Congress Watch, then the capital's largest consumer lobbying office. After leaving the White House, he was a Lecturer in Public Policy at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government (2001-2003), teaching courses on political reform, public leadership and communications. Most recently he has been a litigator in private practice in New York. Mr. Waldman appears frequently on television and radio to discuss public policy, the presidency and the law. Michael Waldman is a graduate of Columbia College (B.A., 1982) and New York University School of Law (J.D., 1987), where he was a member of the Law Review.
Question: How much clout does a speech carry?
Michael Waldman: The words that a president says are very powerful, so the people who help the president with those words, who persuade him, who argue for one thing or another have to take responsibility for what it is they’re arguing for. The “axis of evil” had a huge impact on foreign policy, on the United States’ reputation all over the world. As much as I like the speech writers who worked for President Bush, if I’d written that, I wouldn’t want to take credit for it either. But it’s up to the president, ultimately, what he says, but absolutely, how a president talks, what he chooses to say. When a president in a speech, any president refers to something as a priority, rather than the priority, that’s a billion dollars difference right there in the budget. And when a president’s talking to the whole world in inflammatory terms, it can really set the country forward or back. There are times when you’re surprised, but if you’re doing your job well, you’re not going to be too surprised. The purpose of a presidential speech, almost overwhelmingly, is to move public opinion or move the policy makers who are worried that maybe the public is going to have an opinion. You’re not writing. I always used to tell the speech writers who worked with me, “We’re not writing to put words chiseled on the wall of the Clinton Library. We’re trying to move the ball a few yards.” And so any president knows when they’re talking if what they say is going to appeal to liberals or conservatives, if there’s religious language, if there’s politically inflammatory language or if there’s language that’s supposed to calm things down. In our case, Bill Clinton knew that the media had a very specific idea of what a democrat was supposed to say about the budget, so he knew that if he said in 1995, when Clinton was fighting with the republicans in congress over the government shutdown of the budget, he said, “I want to balanced budget that honors our values by protecting Medicare and Medicaid, education and the environment.” In other words, fiscally responsible, but using government for activist means, in other words, also a conservative argument for a balanced budget and a liberal argument for these government programs. And he knew that if he split those into two sentences, the media, just because of being clichéd, would only say today President Clinton opposed cuts in Medicare, so he had to make sure that there was no period, that there was only a comma. He couldn’t say, “I’m for a balanced budget, but you should know another thing. I’m for saving Medicare.” It had to be in the same sentence. So when the President speaks, you know who your audience is in front of you. You know who might be watching at home on TV. If it’s in front of congress, you know what each caucus is waiting to hear. And most of all, you know what the media is going to do to slice and dice and chop it into little bits. In the era of the Internet, people were willing to listen to a full speech. The number of people who downloaded Barack Obama’s speech on race at the Constitution Center is just breathtaking. That was not available to Bill Clinton in the ‘90s or anyone before that.
Fresh off a well-received speech in Tuscon, President Obama's next oratorical opportunity will be the State of the Union Address on January 25. Michael Waldman explains the art of presidential speechmaking.
A guide to making difficult conversations possible—and peaceful—in an increasingly polarized nation.
Progressive America would be half as big, but twice as populated as its conservative twin.
A federal judge ruled that the Trump administration likely violated the reporter's Fifth Amendment rights when it stripped his press credentials earlier this month.
- Acosta will be allowed to return to the White House on Friday.
- The judge described the ruling as narrow, and didn't rule one way or the other on violations of the First Amendment.
- The case is still open, and the administration may choose to appeal the ruling.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.