The Key to Malcolm Gladwell’s Success
Malcolm Gladwell has been a staff writer with The New Yorker magazine since 1996. His 1999 profile of Ron Popeil won a National Magazine Award, and in 2005 he was named one of Time Magazine's 100 Most Influential People. He is the author of four books, including "The Tipping Point: How Little Things Make a Big Difference," (2000) , "Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking" (2005), and "Outliers: The Story of Success" (2008) all of which were number one New York Times bestsellers. His latest book, "What the Dog Saw" (2009) is a compilation of stories published in The New Yorker.
From 1987 to 1996, he was a reporter with the Washington Post, where he covered business, science, and then served as the newspaper's New York City bureau chief. He graduated from the University of Toronto, Trinity College, with a degree in history. He was born in England, grew up in rural Ontario, and now lives in New York City.
Question: Is your success a byproduct of perseverance or of luck?
Malcolm Gladwell: I don’t feel like I spotted an opportunity. I feel I was simply stubborn enough, I suppose, to want to do my thing. When I was in high school I didn’t want to go to high school anymore, and my mother said "Fine." And so she would write me notes that didn’t have the- that all said, "Malcolm can be excused from school today," and she would leave the date blank, and I would just fill in the date and I would hand the note in and I would just take off. And there were whole years of high school where I was barely there, but my mother was fine with it because her notion was she always said, "As long as you’re doing something productive with your time, you can do whatever you want," which is an incredibly sort of liberating thing.
And that has sort of always been my attitude, that if there is something that you want to do you should just kind of do it, and maybe the world will reward you and maybe it won’t, but it sort of doesn’t matter as long as you’re happy in this kind of doing this sort of thing. And that is, you know, when you think about people who innovate, an awful lot about innovation is that, as opposed to some kind of canny forecasting about where the world is headed or some brilliant understanding about what the world needs next, a lot of the times it’s simply people who have been given an opportunity to do their own little crazy, idiosyncratic thing. And at the end of the day, actually, what the world is interested in is crazy little idiosyncratic things. What we’re interested in, what the world craves, is differentiation, the thing they could never have imagined on their own.
I had lunch today with this guy in the record business and he was talking about breaking new acts and about how you can’t predict the next great hit. All you can look for is just . . . You can’t plan it out. You just kind of walk around and hope you get lucky. And that is like a . . . I thought that was kind of a lovely illustration of some part of the role of innovators, is just to kind of find something weird and put their heart behind it and hope that the world sees, thinks of it as promising as you do.
Why do we want to claim that every great success is a result of some kind of genius that saw it all, some extraordinary foresight? No it isn’t. It’s like, you happened to do something that struck a chord, and then after that all kinds of avenues opened up. That is, to me, a far more plausible explanation. And when I think about my own career, that is how I interpret it. I happened to be doing things that I wanted to do, and they happened to kind of strike a chord at a certain point.
Question: On the other hand, you've written about the necessity of practice in becoming an expert at a particular task. Isn't that important as well?
Malcolm Gladwell: The kind of notion that geniuses, people who are extraordinarily good, invariably have put in an extraordinary amount of effort, this notion of the 10,000 hour rule, that anyone who has mastered a cognitively complex field has almost always put in this extraordinary level of practice first . . . So that says, in order to be good at what you do, you need to be obsessive in your preparation . . . but that is a very separate issue from what makes somebody popular. So mastery is one thing; success and popularity are another. They are sometimes linked, but often they’re not. In fact, continue in a music vein . . . Clive Davis, one of the greatest music executives of all time, the guy who discovered so many artists, when he was hiring someone, A&R people, he would say to them . . . he would ask them to bring in five songs that they thought should be hits, but weren’t, and if he agreed with them, if he heard those five songs and said, “You’re right, that should have been a hit,” he’d hire the person. But implicit in that notion was that the universe of songs that could have been hits was way greater than the universe of songs that were hits. In other words, he thought there was lots of stuff out there he thought was fantastic that never saw the light of day. And that’s, to me, there is a lot of truth in that, that we- that popularity is only a tiny fraction of the universe of things that are great.
Directed / Produced by
Jonathan Fowler & Elizabeth Rodd
What the world craves is differentiation—the things that other people could never have imagined on their own.
These five main food groups are important for your brain's health and likely to boost the production of feel-good chemicals.
We all know eating “healthy” food is good for our physical health and can decrease our risk of developing diabetes, cancer, obesity and heart disease. What is not as well known is that eating healthy food is also good for our mental health and can decrease our risk of depression and anxiety.
Infographics show the classes and anxieties in the supposedly classless U.S. economy.
For those of us who follow politics, we’re used to commentators referring to the President’s low approval rating as a surprise given the U.S.'s “booming” economy. This seeming disconnect, however, should really prompt us to reconsider the measurements by which we assess the health of an economy. With a robust U.S. stock market and GDP and low unemployment figures, it’s easy to see why some think all is well. But looking at real U.S. wages, which have remained stagnant—and have, thus, in effect gone down given rising costs from inflation—a very different picture emerges. For the 1%, the economy is booming. For the rest of us, it’s hard to even know where we stand. A recent study by Porch (a home-improvement company) of blue-collar vs. white-collar workers shows how traditional categories are becoming less distinct—the study references "new-collar" workers, who require technical certifications but not college degrees. And a set of recent infographics from CreditLoan capturing the thoughts of America’s middle class as defined by the Pew Research Center shows how confused we are.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.