The "Age of Netflix" Means Writer Liberation
Ken Auletta has written Annals of Communications columns and profiles for The New Yorker magazine since 1992. He is the author of eleven books, including five national bestsellers: Three Blind Mice: How the TV Networks Lost Their Way; Greed And Glory On Wall Street: The Fall of The House of Lehman; The Highwaymen: Warriors of the Information Super Highway; World War 3.0: Microsoft and Its Enemies; and Googled, The End of the World As We Know It, which was published in November of 2009. His other books include: Backstory: Inside the Business of News; Media Man: Ted Turner’s Improbable Empire; The Streets Were Paved with Gold; and The Underclass.
Auletta was among the first to popularize the so-called information superhighway with his February, 1993, profile of Barry Diller's search for something new. He has profiled the leading figures and companies of the Information Age, including Google, Bill Gates, Rupert Murdoch, AOL Time Warner, John Malone, Harvey Weinstein, and the New York Times; he has dissected media meteors that fell to earth like "push" technology and inter-active TV, probed media violence, the PAC giving of communication giants, the fat lecture fees earned by journalist/pundits, and explored what "synergy" may mean to journalism. His 2001 profile of Ted Turner won a National Magazine Award as the best profile of the year. He covered the Microsoft antitrust trial for the magazine. In ranking him as America's premier media critic, the Columbia Journalism Review concluded, "no other reporter has covered the new communications revolution as thoroughly as has Auletta." New York Magazine described him as the "media Boswell." In another life, Auletta taught and trained Peace Corps volunteers; served as Special Assistant to the U.S. Under Secretary of Commerce; worked in Senator Robert F. Kennedy's 1968 campaign for the Presidency; and was Executive Editor of the weekly Manhattan Tribune.
Ken Auletta: The networks, increasingly in coming years, they’re going to be threatened by people skipping their ads and therefore reducing some of their--a good part--of their revenue. And people not wanting to watch things that a network scheduler says you have to wait until 10 o’clock on Thursday night to watch this show. They’re not going to have the patience for that anymore, because they’re being taught by vehicles, like platforms, like Netflix, not to have to wait anymore. So what can the networks do that’s original? They can do sports which is very expensive, and networks can afford Reed Hastings, and Netflix can’t afford that. But a broadcast network can.
So they can do sports. They can do live special events. Look at the Academy Awards; a billion people around the world watch that. That’s extraordinary and you get huge ad rates for that. They can do reality shows, you know. They can do live events. Again something that some of these newer platforms--digital platforms can’t do. And that increasingly is the view of many people of what will happen to networks. The networks will do fewer series and more live events.
The question then is who does the series? Series are pretty expensive to do. Netflix does, you know, series but only two percent of their budget are originals. So where will the money come from to do--to support the kind of expensive programming? That is a question. Now in HBO which is the most profitable of all these on-demand networks, HBO did 1.8 billion dollar’s worth of profits last year. That’s huge. A lot more than Netflix did. And unlike Netflix they own all of their own shows. You watch the Sopranos. You watch Game of Thrones. That’s owned by HBO. So forever they can repeat those shows and they receive the money because they own it.
Netflix doesn’t even own House of Cards. They rent it. So for a couple of years, several years, you’ll be able to watch House of Cards on Netflix. But then the owners of the studio that owns "House of Cards" could decide to sell it to someone else. And so that’s a vulnerability that a company like Netflix has and a company like HBO doesn’t have.
One of the advantages that Netflix has--they have some disadvantages and we’ve talked about them. They don’t own their own programming for instance. And to expand overseas it’s very expensive and so their profit margins are very small compared, to say, HBO's profit margins. On the other hand, a writer comes to them and they say to the writer or director, they say we’ll give you a commitment. We’ll give you a two year commitment and you won’t have to test it.
And, by the way, instead of writing a show that’s 40 or 42 minutes long, which is, after you subtract the commercials for an hour drama--that’s what network drama is. Yours will be a whole hour. So dear writer, what writer wouldn’t like to write a longer series, a series where he or she doesn’t have to constantly recap and build up for the commercial break and then build down and then build up for another commercial break. But, in fact, can write as if they’re writing chapters of a book that people could read consecutively. So I can build characters, the writer says. I can actually create the complexity that you see in a novel that you often don’t see in an hour drama.
Directed/Produced by Jonathan Fowler, Elizabeth Rodd, and Dillon Fitton
Ken Auletta on how the future of television will be free of commercial interruptions, which benefits writers and viewers alike.
These modern-day hermits can sometimes spend decades without ever leaving their apartments.
- A hikikomori is a type of person in Japan who locks themselves away in their bedrooms, sometimes for years.
- This is a relatively new phenomenon in Japan, likely due to rigid social customs and high expectations for academic and business success.
- Many believe hikikomori to be a result of how Japan interprets and handles mental health issues.
How a cataclysm worse than what killed the dinosaurs destroyed 90 percent of all life on Earth.
While the demise of the dinosaurs gets more attention as far as mass extinctions go, an even more disastrous event called "the Great Dying” or the “End-Permian Extinction” happened on Earth prior to that. Now scientists discovered how this cataclysm, which took place about 250 million years ago, managed to kill off more than 90 percent of all life on the planet.
A new study discovers the “liking gap” — the difference between how we view others we’re meeting for the first time, and the way we think they’re seeing us.
We tend to be defensive socially. When we meet new people, we’re often concerned with how we’re coming off. Our anxiety causes us to be so concerned with the impression we’re creating that we fail to notice that the same is true of the other person as well. A new study led by Erica J. Boothby, published on September 5 in Psychological Science, reveals how people tend to like us more in first encounters than we’d ever suspect.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.