Should You Go With Your Gut?

Question: Is it better to make decisions rationally or go with\r\n your gut?

Sheena Iyengar:  We are often in society \r\ntold to make decisions in one of two ways.  We’re either told "Use your \r\ngut, just go with how you feel about it and let that guide you," or \r\nwe’re told to use reason–some very deliberative methodical process of \r\npros and cons and really thinking it through.  Most of the time you \r\nshould use reason, there is no doubt about that because gut often makes \r\nus susceptible to lots of different biases, particularly if what you’re \r\ndeciding is something that you really, that expertise can be brought to \r\nbear on it, there is a way in which you can align the odds, so then you \r\nshould really use reason.  About the only time our gut can truly \r\noutperform our reason is if we truly have developed a kind of informed \r\nintuition. So that means the chess master or someone who has really \r\nthought about it and given themselves feedback on a particular activity \r\nfor at least 10,000 hours or more.  About the only question that we \r\nwould say and this is a big one in our lives that we would say you don’t\r\n just use pure reason to decide the answer to is anything that affects \r\nyour happiness, because then gut and reason answer very different \r\nquestions. So gut tells you "How do I feel about this right now?"  It \r\ndoesn’t tell me how I feel about it tomorrow or even a few minutes from \r\nnow.  It just tells me how I’m feeling right now.  Reason tells me, when\r\n I do the pros and cons analysis, how I should feel about it right now \r\nand how I should feel about it in 10 years from now and so that the \r\nonly…  So for decisions about happiness you essentially need at least \r\nboth and probably even more than that, you probably also need to do \r\nanalysis that doesn’t involve yourself to get at the answer of what will\r\n make you happy in 10 years. 

About the only time our gut impulse can outperform our reason is if we have developed some kind of truly informed intuition.

How to make a black hole

Here's the science of black holes, from supermassive monsters to ones the size of ping-pong balls.

  • There's more than one way to make a black hole, says NASA's Michelle Thaller. They're not always formed from dead stars. For example, there are teeny tiny black holes all around us, the result of high-energy cosmic rays slamming into our atmosphere with enough force to cram matter together so densely that no light can escape.
  • CERN is trying to create artificial black holes right now, but don't worry, it's not dangerous. Scientists there are attempting to smash two particles together with such intensity that it creates a black hole that would live for just a millionth of a second.
  • Thaller uses a brilliant analogy involving a rubber sheet, a marble, and an elephant to explain why different black holes have varying densities. Watch and learn!
  • Bonus fact: If the Earth became a black hole, it would be crushed to the size of a ping-pong ball.

10 paradoxes that will stretch your mind

From time-traveling billiard balls to information-destroying black holes, the world's got plenty of puzzles that are hard to wrap your head around.

Big Think
Surprising Science
  • While it's one of the best on Earth, the human brain has a lot of trouble accounting for certain problems.
  • We've evolved to think of reality in a very specific way, but there are plenty of paradoxes out there to suggest that reality doesn't work quite the way we think it does.
  • Considering these paradoxes is a great way to come to grips with how incomplete our understanding of the universe really is.
Keep reading Show less

China’s artificial sun reaches fusion temperature: 100 million degrees

In a breakthrough for nuclear fusion research, scientists at China's Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST) reactor have produced temperatures necessary for nuclear fusion on Earth.

Credit: EAST Team
Surprising Science
  • The EAST reactor was able to heat hydrogen to temperatures exceeding 100 million degrees Celsius.
  • Nuclear fusion could someday provide the planet with a virtually limitless supply of clean energy.
  • Still, scientists have many other obstacles to pass before fusion technology becomes a viable energy source.
Keep reading Show less