Re: What is the biggest challenge facing the arts?
Former Chairman of the National Endowment for the Arts, Dana Gioia is an internationally acclaimed and award-winning poet. A native Californian of Italian and Mexican descent, Gioia (pronounced JOY-uh) received a B.A. and a M.B.A. from Stanford University and an M.A. in Comparative Literature from Harvard University.
Gioia has published three full-length collections of poetry, as well as eight chapbooks. His poetry collection, Interrogations at Noon, won the 2002 American Book Award. An influential critic as well, Gioia's 1991 volume Can Poetry Matter?, which was a finalist for the National Book Critics Circle award, is credited with helping to revive the role of poetry in American public culture.
Question: What is the biggest challenge facing the arts?
Dana Gioia: There are so many problems facing the arts today that it’s hard to give just one. Let me pick two. The first is the fact that we live in a world of non-stop, commercial, mass, electronic entertainment; hundreds of TV stations; millions of Internet sites; hundreds of thousands of films and video games. And you can actually sort of be connected to an electronic device from the moment you get up ‘til the moment you . . . you fall asleep. And I think it has the tendency – and this is something . . . I’m saying this as somebody who likes to watch television, likes to go to the movies, likes all of these things – that if left unchecked, unbalanced in life, it breeds a kind of . . . of semi-comatose relationship to reality. You’re always being lulled into kind of a vague sense of comfort. And even if you sit at one side and make cynical comments at your television, you’re still watching it. And I think that it’s hard, in a world like that, for someone to achieve the interiority of existence . . . to develop an inner-life of sufficient death, of sufficient strength, and to understand your destiny. The second thing is that the only force in our society that’s strong enough to in any sense compete with the mass of electronic media is the educational system. And I see the American educational system in really rather dire straits. And talking about the arts, the arts have been systematically removed from most of our schools. And so unless you grow up in an affluent community, you’re most . . . not likely to have the arts in your education. Which means not only are we not developing an audience for the arts – that’s one thing – but more important, the new generation of Americans are not receiving those spurs to personal growth that the arts create. The purpose of arts education is not to create more artists. It’s not to create more audiences. The purpose of arts education is to create a complete human being who can lead a productive life in a free society. You can’t do that just through academics and athletics. There are certain things that you can only learn in stories, in songs, that you can only see in images. When you take this out of a kid’s education, you impoverish their possibilities, both individually and socially. It’s as important to educate a child’s or an adolescent’s emotions as it is their mind. And when you take this out of the education of 60,000,000 American kids, and you focus on developing low-level work skills, I think you have, in the offing, a cultural, educational, economic and political disaster.Well if the arts are going to thrive, if the arts are going to survive, it’s going to be because people recognize why they’re important. We need people in our society who can articulate a better case for their importance. I think one of the problems right now is that the artists and the intellectuals and the . . . of today are more comfortable talking to each other than they are to a mixed audience. In fact in many of these areas, they look down on people who can actually address an audience. I think it’s actually more difficult to talk to a mixed audience than it is to a specialize audience; because suddenly you have all these competing value systems, competing claims, and you have to, in a sense, make a larger and more inclusive case for the importance of what you’re doing. But if artists and intellectuals do not get better, in a sense, of conversing with our society, I do believe that we’re going to see our society, our culture, becoming dumber and dumber. Because there’s also something else that’s part of this that nobody mentions. One of the biggest problems about living in this kind of electronic culture is that we live almost entirely in the present moment. We’ve lost all . . . almost all of our connections with the past. And then we take the present moment and they narrow it down into that part of the present moment which is capable of being turned into entertainment. And so I worry about our society that, first of all, sees so little of the current world, and sees virtually nothing of the past. This is not healthy for society.
The way one gets greater respect for the arts is not through intellectual argumentation. It’s through experience. To have sat in a concert hall and have been moved to the deepest center of your humanity; to go to a museum and be simply ravished by what you see; to go walk down a street in a city with great architecture and see how powerfully design and architecture mold human behavior for the better. Those are the kinds of experiences that I think are transformational. The trouble is if kids don’t get them growing up, it’s increasingly unlikely that they’ll look for them as adults. If we create kids who are essentially lulled into a kind of comfortable, stress-free existence by being mildly entertained all the time, I don’t think that we’re going to have the . . . you know, the heroes, the saints, the reformers that our society needs. Nor will we have the decent, everyday people our society needs.
Recorded On: 7/6/07
There is a non-stop inundation of electronic media, Gioia starts.
Giving our solar system a "slap in the face"
- A stream of galactic debris is hurtling at us, pulling dark matter along with it
- It's traveling so quickly it's been described as a hurricane of dark matter
- Scientists are excited to set their particle detectors at the onslffaught
Bernardo Kastrup proposes a new ontology he calls “idealism” built on panpsychism, the idea that everything in the universe contains consciousness. He solves problems with this philosophy by adding a new suggestion: The universal mind has dissociative identity disorder.
There’s a reason they call it the “hard problem.” Consciousness: Where is it? What is it? No one single perspective seems to be able to answer all the questions we have about consciousness. Now Bernardo Kastrup thinks he’s found one. He calls his ontology idealism, and according to idealism, all of us and all we perceive are manifestations of something very much like a cosmic-scale dissociative identity disorder (DID). He suggests there’s an all-encompassing universe-wide consciousness, it has multiple personalities, and we’re them.
Once again, our circadian rhythm points the way.
- Seven individuals were locked inside a windowless, internetless room for 37 days.
- While at rest, they burned 130 more calories at 5 p.m. than at 5 a.m.
- Morning time again shown not to be the best time to eat.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.