Photographing Nature

Question: How do you gauge what to shoot?

Copeland: It really varies.  It really varies.  It’s not uncommon for me to shoot the same environment time and again until I get it right, because you’re never sure if the moment that you have is gonna yield a better result than if you wait.  So ultimately film is cheap.  And now that we’re in the digital world and digital era, it’s even cheaper.  So it doesn’t hurt to capture something just so that you have it, and in that process also get to understand more the subject that you’re in.  But this of course has, you know, to do with the type of environment that you’re shooting. If you’re shooting wildlife, which is not my specialty but I’ve done some of it, you’re gonna catch as catch can.  If the wildlife presents itself in a moment that it presents itself, you can’t exactly guide it.  There are some masters of it incidentally – which I certainly do not qualify myself as one of them – who are incredible at orchestrating certain types of environments to capture wildlife.  Again that isn’t at all my specialty.  But my relationship with nature photography has really to do with an instinctive and spiritual approach to it.  How am I connected to that landscape?  And how do I respond emotionally to what it’s showing me?

Question: What camera do you use?

Copeland: Well for landscape photography one wants to tend to have the most information on film.  And because you’re not . . . you generally are not beholden to a timeframe that is rigid and dictated by the . . . by the celebrity or by the job, you have more time to set up.  And so I tend to prefer shooting larger formats.  And so primarily I’ll shoot 4 x 5 or medium format; or large format panoramic which would be 6 x 17; or in medium format 6 x 7.  And that’s what I tend to shoot landscape with.  And typically exclusively with those mediums, however, having traveled to the arctic and Antarctica, I was met with the limitations of utilizing this type of format in environments that are antagonist or hostile to the use of large format.  And with that I mean that environments that are particularly cold, and sometimes particularly wet, and sometimes physically straining, those conditions dictate a certain approach.  And listen, you have Frank Hurley ____________ carried around an 8 x 10 camera and came back with extraordinary results – an incredible hero for his commitment to . . . I mean him and ___________ incidentally and the whole team – for understanding the value of reporting what they were capturing.  But it’s not easy.  I mean I was in the arctic and I was gung ho about utilizing large formats, and was wholly unprepared primarily out of inexperience.  But my equipment . . . Some of my equipment froze.  My hands were very cold.  The conditions were particularly challenging.  And as a result I just came to realize that extreme environments just do not lend themselves well to that type of format.  And so when I traveled to Antarctica, I understood that the digital medium was . . . was particularly well suited to those challenging environments.  So in Antarctica I shot large format and medium formats; but primarily my motive of capture was 35 mm digital, which incidentally with the new cameras is quite extraordinary and yields amazing results.  So I did 90 percent of the work in Antarctica with 35mm digital – Canon specifically.

How does Copeland know when and what to shoot? What kind of cameras does he use?

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

Dead – yes, dead – tardigrade found beneath Antarctica

A completely unexpected discovery beneath the ice.

(Goldstein Lab/Wkikpedia/Tigerspaws/Big Think)
Surprising Science
  • Scientists find remains of a tardigrade and crustaceans in a deep, frozen Antarctic lake.
  • The creatures' origin is unknown, and further study is ongoing.
  • Biology speaks up about Antarctica's history.
Keep reading Show less

If you want to spot a narcissist, look at the eyebrows

Bushier eyebrows are associated with higher levels of narcissism, according to new research.

Big Think illustration / Actor Peter Gallagher attends the 24th and final 'A Night at Sardi's' to benefit the Alzheimer's Association at The Beverly Hilton Hotel on March 9, 2016 in Beverly Hills, California. (Photo by Alberto E. Rodriguez/Getty Images)
  • Science has provided an excellent clue for identifying the narcissists among us.
  • Eyebrows are crucial to recognizing identities.
  • The study provides insight into how we process faces and our latent ability to detect toxic people.
Keep reading Show less

Why are women more religious than men? Because men are more willing to take risks.

It's one factor that can help explain the religiosity gap.

Photo credit: Alina Strong on Unsplash
Culture & Religion
  • Sociologists have long observed a gap between the religiosity of men and women.
  • A recent study used data from several national surveys to compare religiosity, risk-taking preferences and demographic information among more than 20,000 American adolescents.
  • The results suggest that risk-taking preferences might partly explain the gender differences in religiosity.
Keep reading Show less