Paul Krugman on the Income Gap

Question: Is the income gap growing?

Paul Krugman: The income gap is huge.  It’s growing.  Over the last 35 years, it’s . . . there’s     . . .  There’s some real argument about whether the income of the typical family has gone up.  There are . . .  The median income is up a little bit, but that’s because of an increased number of working wives.  And if you take into account the time . . .  It’s not a question you need to resolve.  The point is that we can even argue about it.  In 35 years, we’re talking about over the period when personal computers, and the Internet, and even for that matter fax machines, and freight containerization and bar code scanners – all these things have come along to make us more productive, and yet we’re not sure if workers have gained.  That’s telling . . .  The reason, of course, is huge gains at the top – a few people achieving huge wage gains.  Or non-wage gains, but few . . . you know a small minority explosion of income.  And that’s a . . . that’s a problem.  And in the . . .  In the United States economy the last four years, we’ve had . . . finally we started to get reasonable job growth.  And by the top line measures – by GDP – it’s a growing economy.  But it hasn’t done much for the typical worker.  And it’s . . . it’s really been the left behind economy.  Great . . . great growth in corporate profits, surge in compensation at the very highest levels, but very little for workers.

I mean there’s always a kind of, you know, shuffling, although not as much as people think.  So that’s, you know . . .  I’d like to say Horatio Alger has moved to Europe.  It’s actually harder to make your way from a relatively poor background into the upper middle or above classes in the United States than it is in most European countries.  And the reason is inadequate public education; lack of public funding for college tuition; just the . . . and just the fact that our income gaps are so large that it’s a much steeper climb for people to make.

Given time a lot of people are both rising and sinking.  And it’s . . .  Put it this way.  If you’re a middle class household, your chance of having a series of unfortunate events plunge you into the . . . into the poor or the near poor is a lot higher than your chance of being lucky enough to make it into the small, favored elite.

 

The income gap is huge and a growing problem.

Why a federal judge ordered White House to restore Jim Acosta's press badge

A federal judge ruled that the Trump administration likely violated the reporter's Fifth Amendment rights when it stripped his press credentials earlier this month.

WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 16: CNN chief White House correspondent Jim Acosta (R) returns to the White House with CNN Washington bureau chief Sam Feist after Federal judge Timothy J. Kelly ordered the White House to reinstate his press pass November 16, 2018 in Washington, DC. CNN has filed a lawsuit against the White House after Acosta's press pass was revoked after a dispute involving a news conference last week. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
Politics & Current Affairs
  • Acosta will be allowed to return to the White House on Friday.
  • The judge described the ruling as narrow, and didn't rule one way or the other on violations of the First Amendment.
  • The case is still open, and the administration may choose to appeal the ruling.
Keep reading Show less

How to split the USA into two countries: Red and Blue

Progressive America would be half as big, but twice as populated as its conservative twin.

Image: Dicken Schrader
Strange Maps
  • America's two political tribes have consolidated into 'red' and 'blue' nations, with seemingly irreconcilable differences.
  • Perhaps the best way to stop the infighting is to go for a divorce and give the two nations a country each
  • Based on the UN's partition plan for Israel/Palestine, this proposal provides territorial contiguity and sea access to both 'red' and 'blue' America
Keep reading Show less

Scientists just voted to change the definition of a kilogram

The definition of a kilogram will now be fixed to Planck's constant, a fundamental part of quantum physics.

Greg L via Wikipedia
Surprising Science
  • The new definition of a kilogram is based on a physical constant in quantum physics.
  • Unlike the current definition of a kilogram, this measurement will never change.
  • Scientists also voted to update the definitions of several other measurements in physics.
Keep reading Show less