Katrina vanden Heuvel on Modern Journalism
Katrina vanden Heuvel has been The Nation's editor since 1995 and publisher since 2005.
She is the co-editor of Taking Back America--And Taking Down The Radical Right (NationBooks, 2004) and, most recently, editor of The Dictionary of Republicanisms, (NationBooks, 2005)
She is a frequent commentator on American and international politics on MSNBC, CNN and PBS. Her articles have appeared in The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, The New York Times and The Boston Globe.
She is a recipient of Planned Parenthood's Maggie Award for her article, "Right-to-Lifers Hit Russia." The special issue she conceived and edited, "Gorbachev's Soviet Union," was awarded New York University's 1988 Olive Branch Award. Vanden Heuvel was also co-editor of Vyi i Myi, a Russian-language feminist newsletter.
She has received awards for public service from numerous groups, including The Liberty Hill Foundation, The Correctional Association and The Association for American-Russian Women. In 2003, she received the New York Civil Liberties Union's Callaway Prize for the Defense of the Right of Privacy. She is also the recipient of The American-Arab Anti-discrimination Committee's 2003 "Voices of Peace" award. Vanden Heuvel is a member of The Council on Foreign Relations, and she also serves on the board of The Institute for Women's Policy Research, The Institute for Policy Studies, The World Policy Institute, The Correctional Association of New York and The Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt Institute.
She is a summa cum laude graduate of Princeton University, and she lives in New York City with her husband and daughter.
Question: Where is journalism today?
vanden Heuvel: I think that there is a crisis of journalism, but out of that crisis comes some hard thinking about the future of journalism which may be very positive. I sit and work in a magazine which has always believed in the importance of deep reporting, of engaging citizens, of informing citizens as the ground stone of participatory democracy, and I think, I know that at The Nation, where 15 years ago we did a series called the National Entertainment State which looked at the 6 big corporations controlling our medium and what that meant in terms of not only blurring, but I would say, today, obliterating the line between news and entertainment, that we were in trouble. This was 6 years ago… I mean, 15 years ago. Now, we face new crises. Newspapers are collapsing. We need to find alternative models of ownership, and that’s something The Nation is interested in pursuing. I’m not a believer that the internet is going to set us free, but I am a believer that we’re going to see new models on the internet and that younger readers, consumers of news, in the best sense of that term, are going to the internet to find what they want to read. I hope that in this next period that we’re going to see new models on the internet, where you have some deep investigative reporting which is crucial for any democracy and where we rebuild the reporting on the world, because after 9/11 it seemed to me that America needed to reengage with a world it didn’t know, but instead fear became the way we reengaged. Today, I hope there is a way we can rebuild journalism to cover the world and to investigate abuses, corruption, something The Nation’s been doing for 143 years. So, I’m hopeful that out of crisis can come real change.
Question: What are some alternative models for ownership?
vanden Heuvel: In this country, there is the Poynter Journalism Center I believe it’s called, and Florida has supported the St. Petersburg Times. It’s a community foundation that supports the paper. In Wisconsin, the Cap Times has been supported again by a family foundation. ProPublica, a new online organization, is foundation supported and has brought on some of the best investigative journalists who have left newspapers, and they are doing some important investigative reporting, distributing it through the internet. The Nation, for example, has been for profit for 143 years, though losing money for about 140 of those, and we build a community of supporters into the magazine and then have a fund for investigative journalism through a non-profit which supports us and other journalists. In Britain, the Guardian newspaper, terrific paper, has a very complicated endowment structure. So, it’s going to require looking at these structures and seeing how they apply to the US model. One last point in, I believe it’s in Boulder, Colorado, and in a few cities around this country, papers are folding, but they’re going online, and they’re seeking support from readers and from the community, which they turn to the community and say, if you want to learn about your community, if you want to know what’s going on, help support us. So, it’s community support that may also fill in what’s been missing. And as corporations, and the big corporations we wrote about 15 years ago are all in big trouble because of the economic financial crisis, as that kind of funding dissipates, and we see layoffs everyday, the crisis will ratchet up the need to find these alternatives, which are a model, a kind of hybrid of non-profit foundation community reader support.
Question: How would you advise aspiring journalists?
vanden Heuvel: I’d suggest that first of all they school themselves deeply in some of the great models of journalism over the years, whether it’s I.F. Stone, the great radical, independent journalist who founded his own weekly in Washington because no one would hire him, though he was The Nation’s Washington correspondent for a period. So, he was the first kind of print independent, form-your-own, found-your-own, but school yourself in the models of journalism which have advanced this country. I would suggest to some student, if they have a deep interest in, for example foreign affairs or science, technology, you know, deepen that knowledge so you become an expert, and that is a calling card. And then multimedia skills, learn hot to write well, but learn how to write well for print, for the internet, learn how to use video, learn how to write for radio, so that you have a set of tools that can take you into the new media world, but never lose that basic schooling in the history of journalism and the best practitioners of investigative reporting, of political reporting.
Katrina vanden Heuvel explains where she sees reporting today.
How a cataclysm worse than what killed the dinosaurs destroyed 90 percent of all life on Earth.
While the demise of the dinosaurs gets more attention as far as mass extinctions go, an even more disastrous event called "the Great Dying” or the “End-Permian Extinction” happened on Earth prior to that. Now scientists discovered how this cataclysm, which took place about 250 million years ago, managed to kill off more than 90 percent of all life on the planet.
A new study discovers the “liking gap” — the difference between how we view others we’re meeting for the first time, and the way we think they’re seeing us.
We tend to be defensive socially. When we meet new people, we’re often concerned with how we’re coming off. Our anxiety causes us to be so concerned with the impression we’re creating that we fail to notice that the same is true of the other person as well. A new study led by Erica J. Boothby, published on September 5 in Psychological Science, reveals how people tend to like us more in first encounters than we’d ever suspect.
Using advanced laser technology, scientists at NASA will track global changes in ice with greater accuracy.
Leaving from Vandenberg Air Force base in California this coming Saturday, at 8:46 a.m. ET, the Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite-2 — or, the "ICESat-2" — is perched atop a United Launch Alliance Delta II rocket, and when it assumes its orbit, it will study ice layers at Earth's poles, using its only payload, the Advance Topographic Laser Altimeter System (ATLAS).
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.