Is there a generation gap in understanding the Iraq War?

John Legend: Well I think certain things are different about each of those wars [the US/Iraq war and the US/Afghanistan war]. But I think fundamentally both of those wars were wars of choice that, in retrospect, particularly for me in advance I believed that Iraq was a bad idea, but in retrospect I believe that even more people believe that. But both of those were wars of choice.

One major difference is the lack of a draft in Iraq versus the draft in Vietnam. I think more people felt the pain of Vietnam because of the draft, and because so many more people across a broader spectrum of socio-economic status were going to the war. And so I think the country felt the pain, and young people particularly felt the pain of Vietnam more than I think we feel it now here in 2008 with Iraq. Because a lot of us don’t even know people that are at war. We know of people, but there are a lot of us that don’t know people that are in Iraq. I meet families on the road, but I don’t have any family members that are in Iraq, and a lot of people don’t. And I think that allows a lot of people to not think about Iraq, and not think about the fact that 4,000 of our soldiers have died there; and tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of Iraqis have died during the time that we’ve been there.

It allows us to kind of distance ourselves from it, but I hope we don’t forget that war is costly. War costs a lot of lives, and it costs a lot of money that we could have been spending on a lot of other things. And hopefully our next president will not take us into a war of choice with the recklessness that we were taken into Iraq.

Recorded on: Jan 29, 2008

This generation barely knows it's at war.

Personal Growth

The life choices that had led me to be sitting in a booth underneath a banner that read “Ask a Philosopher" – at the entrance to the New York City subway at 57th and 8th – were perhaps random but inevitable.

Keep reading Show less

Why radicals can't recognize when they're wrong

It's not just ostriches who stick their head in the sand.

Image source: Shutterstock
Mind & Brain
  • Not only does everyone have personal experience with how difficult it can be to change people's minds, but there's also empirical research showing why this is the case.
  • A new study in Current Biology explains why some people seem to be constitutionally incapable of admitting they're wrong.
  • The study shows the underlying mechanism behind being bull-headed, and there may be some ways to get better at recognizing when you're wrong.
Keep reading Show less

'Self is not entirely lost in dementia,' argues new review

The assumption "that without memory, there can be no self" is wrong, say researchers.

Photo credit: Darren Hauck / Getty Images
Mind & Brain

In the past when scholars have reflected on the psychological impact of dementia they have frequently referred to the loss of the "self" in dramatic and devastating terms, using language such as the "unbecoming of the self" or the "disintegration" of the self. In a new review released as a preprint at PsyArXiv, an international team of psychologists led by Muireann Irish at the University of Sydney challenge this bleak picture which they attribute to the common, but mistaken, assumption "that without memory, there can be no self" (as encapsulated by the line from Hume: "Memory alone… 'tis to be considered… as the source of personal identity").

Keep reading Show less