Is Science the Future of Literature?

Question: What is the\r\nfuture of literary studies?

\r\n\r\n

Louis Menand: There has been this \r\nperiod of about 15 years of\r\nanxiety, about sort of loss of exciting, theoretical paradigms, which \r\nwere very\r\nvibrant for about 20 or 30 years after the ‘60’s and it kind of gave \r\nlife to\r\nliterary studies, basically critical theory, post-structuralism, then \r\nfeminist\r\ncriticism, and so on.  Queer\r\ntheory... All these other, things were exciting and brought people into \r\nthe field\r\nor gave people a new way of reading and teaching this material.  And then there’s been this kind of\r\ndrought for a little bit and the kind of post-theory moment, and so \r\nforth,\r\nwhich has, of course, been heavily theorized as well.

\r\n\r\n

And right now I feel that the sort of coming thing \r\nis this\r\nuse of cognitive science and talking about why we read and how we read, \r\nand\r\nthere have been some books that people get excited about that have come \r\nout in\r\nthe last three or four years on the subject and cognitive science, \r\ngenerally, I\r\nthink is one of the places in the whole academy where things are \r\nhappening that\r\neverybody in other disciplines is now paying attention to. \r\n Even in the economics department,\r\nthey’re paying a lot of attention to it. 

\r\n\r\n

So that seems to be, when I look at, for example,\r\napplications to our graduate program, a lot of people, just even in \r\ncollege,\r\nare already expressing an interest in pursuing literary studies in \r\ncombination\r\nwith something in cognitive science. \r\nMy own view of the moment is I don’t really see cognitive science\r\n as actually adding all that much to what we’re able to do with texts, \r\nwe’re\r\nable to say about them.  But that\r\ncould change.  I mean, cognitive\r\nscience is a rapidly developing area, so it could be that there are some\r\nsurprises around the corner.  That\r\ndoes seem to be kind of where the trend line is leading. \r\n And you could say this is just an\r\neffort on the part of people in literature to get some, you know, street\r\n cred\r\nin the academy by being scientific. \r\nBut it’s more than that, I think there’s a genuine feeling that \r\nthis is\r\na kind of exciting way of repositioning the subject that we teach, \r\ngetting away\r\nfrom arguments about the canon and arguments about, you know, ranking, \r\nand\r\nwho’s the best author, and that kind of stuff and much more in the \r\ndirection of\r\nsomething that’s appropriate to scholarship and research.

Louis Menand isn’t sure the cognitive science approach to literature has yielded much of interest so far, but thinks there may be "some surprises around the corner."

Do you worry too much? Stoicism can help

How imagining the worst case scenario can help calm anxiety.

Credit: OLIVIER DOULIERY via Getty Images
Personal Growth
  • Stoicism is the philosophy that nothing about the world is good or bad in itself, and that we have control over both our judgments and our reactions to things.
  • It is hardest to control our reactions to the things that come unexpectedly.
  • By meditating every day on the "worst case scenario," we can take the sting out of the worst that life can throw our way.
Keep reading Show less

Study: People will donate more to charity if they think something’s in it for them

A study on charity finds that reminding people how nice it feels to give yields better results than appealing to altruism.

Photo by Pixabay from Pexels
Personal Growth
  • A study finds asking for donations by appealing to the donor's self-interest may result in more money than appealing to their better nature.
  • Those who received an appeal to self-interest were both more likely to give and gave more than those in the control group.
  • The effect was most pronounced for those who hadn't given before.
Keep reading Show less

U.S. Navy controls inventions that claim to change "fabric of reality"

Inventions with revolutionary potential made by a mysterious aerospace engineer for the U.S. Navy come to light.

Credit: Getty Images
Surprising Science
  • U.S. Navy holds patents for enigmatic inventions by aerospace engineer Dr. Salvatore Pais.
  • Pais came up with technology that can "engineer" reality, devising an ultrafast craft, a fusion reactor, and more.
  • While mostly theoretical at this point, the inventions could transform energy, space, and military sectors.
Keep reading Show less

160-million-year-old ‘Monkeydactyl’ was the first animal to develop opposable thumbs

The 'Monkeydactyl' was a flying reptile that evolved highly specialized adaptations in the Mesozoic Era.

Credit: Zhou et al.
Surprising Science
  • The 'Monkeydactly', or Kunpengopterus antipollicatus, was a species of pterosaur, a group of flying reptiles that were the first vertebrates to evolve the ability of powered flight.
  • In a recent study, a team of researchers used microcomputed tomography scanning to analyze the anatomy of the newly discovered species, finding that it was the first known species to develop opposable thumbs.
  • As highly specialized dinosaurs, pterosaurs boasted unusual anatomy that gave them special advantages as aerial predators in the Mesozoic Era.
Keep reading Show less
Quantcast