How to Make Dozens of Musicians Play as One


\r\nQuestion:
What are you listening for when you're conducting?
\r\n

\r\nAlan Gilbert:  Well, both.  I mean, I try to hear everything \r\nthat's happening, and that can be very, very difficult, and someone that\r\n tells you, “Oh, I hear everything that's happening onstage” is lying \r\nbecause there's almost no way, I think, to really do that.  But as an \r\nexercise, I do try to identify, okay, What is that musician, the third \r\nflute, playing?  And I try to make sure I can hear that.  You have to \r\nhear what's going on because if you're... there's a way... I've used the\r\n analogy...  It's like a ball, a very big ball.  You can affect the way \r\nthe ball rolls, and you can change the direction that the ball is \r\nrolling if it's already in motion, but you can't suddenly have it turn \r\nan abrupt angle.  There's a natural way that the ball can be guided, so \r\neven though you're steering the ball there's a natural momentum the ball\r\n has that you can't interfere with. 

If the orchestra has a \r\ncertain flow, you can affect the flow, but there's a natural way to do \r\nthat, and there's a way that actually would interrupt the natural flow. \r\n So it's not that you can just do whatever you want.  You have to take \r\ninto account what is happening and what is being offered from the \r\nplayers.  So that means really being in touch with they're doing and \r\nhearing them as well as you can.  It's surprisingly difficult to really \r\nidentify, not even with two, or three, or four lines, but even just one \r\nline, to really hear what the will and the sense that the players are \r\ngiving to one line, to really listen to that and to actually be able to \r\nreact to it in a meaningful way is surprisingly difficult.

\r\nQuestion:
When you hear an instrument that is out of sync, how do you steer it back without throwing everyone else?
\r\n

Alan Gilbert: Well, that's difficult, and what happens is\r\n if there's more than one current, if there are conflicting currents \r\nonstage, then you have to make a choice.  You have to either give in or \r\ninsist.  For the other musicians onstage, if they sense two currents, if\r\n they say... for example, if I show one thing and they hear a response \r\nto that that is not in sync, then they have a dilemma; they have to \r\nchoose, “Do I go with what I see from the conductor or do I go with what\r\n I hear?”

So I very often tell orchestras, even the New York \r\nPhilharmonic,  say, “You know, I really want you to play with my lead.  \r\nIt's not that I care about your following me that precisely, it's just \r\nthat I want to take the element of choice out of the question” so that \r\npeople are not forced to decide Do I follow him or do I not follow him? \r\n There has to be just one current.  Of course, mistakes happen.  \r\nAccidents happen.  If something goes wrong, then you just have to use \r\nyour sense and that's based on experience.  Either you give in - \r\nsometimes it's better to give in and allow it to sort of right itself \r\nover time.  Other times you sort of dig your heels in and say “No.  This\r\n is where it is.”  And it creates a discomfort and uncomfortable moment,\r\n but you try to use your best sense, and I couldn't say it's always one \r\nway or it's always another way.  You just have to figure out what's the \r\nbest way to get out of those situations, and hopefully they're not too \r\nfrequent.

Recorded on June 18, 2010
Interviewed by David Hirschman

An orchestra has a momentum as it plays. Its flow can be affected and redirected, but the conductor must do it in an natural way to avoid jarring turns.

NASA astronomer Michelle Thaller on ​the multiple dimensions of space and human sexuality

Science and the squishiness of the human mind. The joys of wearing whatever the hell you want, and so much more.

Think Again Podcasts
  • Why can't we have a human-sized cat tree?
  • What would happen if you got a spoonful of a neutron star?
  • Why do we insist on dividing our wonderfully complex selves into boring little boxes
Keep reading Show less

How to split the USA into two countries: Red and Blue

Progressive America would be half as big, but twice as populated as its conservative twin.

Image: Dicken Schrader
Strange Maps
  • America's two political tribes have consolidated into 'red' and 'blue' nations, with seemingly irreconcilable differences.
  • Perhaps the best way to stop the infighting is to go for a divorce and give the two nations a country each
  • Based on the UN's partition plan for Israel/Palestine, this proposal provides territorial contiguity and sea access to both 'red' and 'blue' America
Keep reading Show less

Ideology drives us apart. Neuroscience can bring us back together.

A guide to making difficult conversations possible—and peaceful—in an increasingly polarized nation.

Sponsored
  • How can we reach out to people on the other side of the divide? Get to know the other person as a human being before you get to know them as a set of tribal political beliefs, says Sarah Ruger. Don't launch straight into the difficult topics—connect on a more basic level first.
  • To bond, use icebreakers backed by neuroscience and psychology: Share a meal, watch some comedy, see awe-inspiring art, go on a tough hike together—sharing tribulation helps break down some of the mental barriers we have between us. Then, get down to talking, putting your humanity before your ideology.
  • The Charles Koch Foundation is committed to understanding what drives intolerance and the best ways to cure it. The foundation supports interdisciplinary research to overcome intolerance, new models for peaceful interactions, and experiments that can heal fractured communities. For more information, visit charleskochfoundation.org/courageous-collaborations.