How to Make Dozens of Musicians Play as One

What are you listening for when you're conducting?

\r\nAlan Gilbert:  Well, both.  I mean, I try to hear everything \r\nthat's happening, and that can be very, very difficult, and someone that\r\n tells you, “Oh, I hear everything that's happening onstage” is lying \r\nbecause there's almost no way, I think, to really do that.  But as an \r\nexercise, I do try to identify, okay, What is that musician, the third \r\nflute, playing?  And I try to make sure I can hear that.  You have to \r\nhear what's going on because if you're... there's a way... I've used the\r\n analogy...  It's like a ball, a very big ball.  You can affect the way \r\nthe ball rolls, and you can change the direction that the ball is \r\nrolling if it's already in motion, but you can't suddenly have it turn \r\nan abrupt angle.  There's a natural way that the ball can be guided, so \r\neven though you're steering the ball there's a natural momentum the ball\r\n has that you can't interfere with. 

If the orchestra has a \r\ncertain flow, you can affect the flow, but there's a natural way to do \r\nthat, and there's a way that actually would interrupt the natural flow. \r\n So it's not that you can just do whatever you want.  You have to take \r\ninto account what is happening and what is being offered from the \r\nplayers.  So that means really being in touch with they're doing and \r\nhearing them as well as you can.  It's surprisingly difficult to really \r\nidentify, not even with two, or three, or four lines, but even just one \r\nline, to really hear what the will and the sense that the players are \r\ngiving to one line, to really listen to that and to actually be able to \r\nreact to it in a meaningful way is surprisingly difficult.

When you hear an instrument that is out of sync, how do you steer it back without throwing everyone else?

Alan Gilbert: Well, that's difficult, and what happens is\r\n if there's more than one current, if there are conflicting currents \r\nonstage, then you have to make a choice.  You have to either give in or \r\ninsist.  For the other musicians onstage, if they sense two currents, if\r\n they say... for example, if I show one thing and they hear a response \r\nto that that is not in sync, then they have a dilemma; they have to \r\nchoose, “Do I go with what I see from the conductor or do I go with what\r\n I hear?”

So I very often tell orchestras, even the New York \r\nPhilharmonic,  say, “You know, I really want you to play with my lead.  \r\nIt's not that I care about your following me that precisely, it's just \r\nthat I want to take the element of choice out of the question” so that \r\npeople are not forced to decide Do I follow him or do I not follow him? \r\n There has to be just one current.  Of course, mistakes happen.  \r\nAccidents happen.  If something goes wrong, then you just have to use \r\nyour sense and that's based on experience.  Either you give in - \r\nsometimes it's better to give in and allow it to sort of right itself \r\nover time.  Other times you sort of dig your heels in and say “No.  This\r\n is where it is.”  And it creates a discomfort and uncomfortable moment,\r\n but you try to use your best sense, and I couldn't say it's always one \r\nway or it's always another way.  You just have to figure out what's the \r\nbest way to get out of those situations, and hopefully they're not too \r\nfrequent.

Recorded on June 18, 2010
Interviewed by David Hirschman

An orchestra has a momentum as it plays. Its flow can be affected and redirected, but the conductor must do it in an natural way to avoid jarring turns.

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

10 books to check out from Jordan Peterson's 'Great Books' list

The Canadian professor has an extensive collection posted on his site.

Jordan Peterson with Carl Jung and the cover art of Jaak Panksepp's 'Affective Neuroscience' (Image: Chris Williamson/Getty Images/Big Think)
Personal Growth
  • Peterson's Great Books list features classics by Orwell, Jung, Huxley, and Dostoevsky.
  • Categories include literature, neuroscience, religion, and systems analysis.
  • Having recently left Patreon for "freedom of speech" reasons, Peterson is taking direct donations through Paypal (and Bitcoin).
Keep reading Show less

Scientists claim the Bible is written in code that predicts future events

The controversy around the Torah codes gets a new life.

Michael Drosnin
Surprising Science
  • Mathematicians claim to see a predictive pattern in the ancient Torah texts.
  • The code is revealed by a method found with special computer software.
  • Some events described by reading the code took place after the code was written.
Keep reading Show less

Should you invest in China's stock market? Know this one thing first.

Despite incredible economic growth, it is not necessarily an investor's paradise.

  • China's stock market is just 27 years old. It's economy has grown 30x over that time.
  • Imagine if you had invested early and gotten in on the ground floor.
  • Actually, you would have lost money. Here's how that's possible.