How should the U.S. address Islamic fundamentalism?

Ken Adelman: Well the number one issue is how do you combat an Islamic fundamentalism? And not just fundamentalism, but a totalitarian approach so that we all have to be believers, and Muslim beliefs in Allah. And otherwise we’re infidels. Otherwise, we should be slain. Otherwise we have no way to get to heaven. Otherwise we’re just cannon fodder for their beliefs. And that is a terrible threat. And it’s a terrible threat because there are people that are willing to die for that view, and willing to use weapons of mass destructions to get that view across. And that is . . . I think that’s awful.

In the past in history, when you had monsters in history – God knows we had the Hitlers, the Maos, the Stalins – they had to take over a state to really wreak their havoc. Nowadays with weapons of mass destruction, you don’t need to take over a state. To take over a state is very hard. So it keeps a lot of these psychopaths out of getting any power. But now the psychopaths like that can get weapons of mass destruction. Destruction in that sense has been privatized. And that is very frightful.

You have to defeat them.

So you make sure that . . . in two ways. Number one is a kind of military or forceful way that those who are convinced of this are defeated. They’re not reasoned with. They’re not negotiated with, but they’re just defeated. And number two is the new crop out there that show the error of the way of forcing these beliefs on other people. And the value of, you know, life. And that life is wonderful. They have to flower and prosper by themselves, and not in the basis of suicide bombing or anything like that.

Recorded on: 7/2/07

 

Adelman believes it must be dealt with seriously and forcefully.

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Sponsored
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

Brain study finds circuits that may help you keep your cool

Research by neuroscientists at MIT's Picower Institute for Learning and Memory helps explain how the brain regulates arousal.

Photo by CHARLY TRIBALLEAU / AFP/ Getty Images
Mind & Brain

MIT News

The big day has come: You are taking your road test to get your driver's license. As you start your mom's car with a stern-faced evaluator in the passenger seat, you know you'll need to be alert but not so excited that you make mistakes. Even if you are simultaneously sleep-deprived and full of nervous energy, you need your brain to moderate your level of arousal so that you do your best.

Keep reading Show less

34 years ago, a KGB defector chillingly predicted modern America

A disturbing interview given by a KGB defector in 1984 describes America of today and outlines four stages of mass brainwashing used by the KGB.

Politics & Current Affairs
  • Bezmenov described this process as "a great brainwashing" which has four basic stages.
  • The first stage is called "demoralization" which takes from 15 to 20 years to achieve.
  • According to the former KGB agent, that is the minimum number of years it takes to re-educate one generation of students that is normally exposed to the ideology of its country.
Keep reading Show less

How pharmaceutical companies game the patent system

When these companies compete, in the current system, the people lose.

Top Video Splash
  • When a company reaches the top of the ladder, they typically kick it away so that others cannot climb up on it. The aim? So that another company can't compete.
  • When this happens in the pharmaceutical world, certain companies stay at the top of the ladder, through broadly-protected patents, at the cost of everyday people benefitting from increased competition.
  • Since companies have worked out how to legally game the system, Amin argues we need to get rid of this "one size fits all" system, which treats product innovation — "tweaks" — the same as product invention.