How has Washington changed?

Question: Do you remember your first day in Washington?

Armitage:    Yeah I certainly do.  I . . . (laughter) . . . I packed up my family . . . and this was after left Iran in 1977.  I packed up my family.  We were living in California, and I had two daughters at the time.  And my wife, two children and I drove across country.  We bought a home here, and I started looking for work.  Well unfortunately this was at a time when Mr. Carter was busy downsizing government, and this shows you how naïve and young I was at that time.  I was knocking on doors just figuring, well, I deserved to be looked at.  And I was starving to death; but all of a sudden I was introduced to Bob Dole, and lickety-split he asked me to be his Administrative Assistant.  So half of life is just showing up.  And as Napoleon reminds us, he’d rather have lucky generals than smart ones.  I was certainly lucky.

Question: How has Washington changed since then?

Armitage:    Well it’s . . .  I’d have to say a lot has changed.  At the time when I came here . . .  The founding fathers were brilliant in their initial decisions to have a Senate and a House.  Thoughtful upper chamber and a House which is more reflective of the day-to-day life of Americans.  But two things have rather dramatically changed the political climate here in Washington.  The first had to do with the election of sort of single issue mavens, whether . . .  This was a time of the Vietnam War where they were elected just to end the war, or more laterally the pro-choice, or anti-abortion, single issue environmentalist or whatever . . . whatever the issue is.

    The second is that many more House members are now being elected to the Senate, and they bring to the Senate, in my view, the House mentality which is much more rambunctious, much less thoughtful, and not conducive to good, thoughtful tension to be introduced between the Executive branch and the Legislative branch.  And our system requires a thoughtful tension for both branches to work at optimum . . . in an optimum way.

Armitage discusses the rise of single-issue mavens.

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

26 ultra-rich people own as much as the world's 3.8 billion poorest

The Oxfam report prompted Anand Giridharadas to tweet: "Don't be Pinkered into everything's-getting-better complacency."

Getty Images and Wikimedia Commons
Politics & Current Affairs
  • A new report by Oxfam argues that wealth inequality is causing poverty and misery around the world.
  • In the last year, the world's billionaires saw their wealth increase by 12%, while the poorest 3.8 billion people on the planet lost 11% of their wealth.
  • The report prompted Anand Giridharadas to tweet: "Don't be Pinkered into everything's-getting-better complacency." We explain what Steven Pinker's got to do with it.
Keep reading Show less

Your body’s full of stuff you no longer need. Here's a list.

Evolution doesn't clean up after itself very well.

Image source: Ernst Haeckel
Surprising Science
  • An evolutionary biologist got people swapping ideas about our lingering vestigia.
  • Basically, this is the stuff that served some evolutionary purpose at some point, but now is kind of, well, extra.
  • Here are the six traits that inaugurated the fun.
Keep reading Show less
  • Facebook and Google began as companies with supposedly noble purposes.
  • Creating a more connected world and indexing the world's information: what could be better than that?
  • But pressure to return value to shareholders came at the expense of their own users.
Keep reading Show less