Globalization and the Middle Class
David Dollar: Well in some of my recent writings, argued that global trade does seem to be driving down wages for unskilled or semiskilled workers in countries like the United States and Western Europe. And I think this is an important political issue. There's no question that inequality has risen in the United States. Wages for ordinary workers have been fairly stagnant or have only risen a small amount, while incomes at the high end of the salary scale have gone up a lot. And at the very top of the income distribution, incomes have gone up spectacularly. So I do think that's a very important issue. I would argue that trying to address that by restricting trade is not likely to succeed. It makes the whole country poor. It's a bad way to treat the developing world. The developing world is benefiting a lot from this regime. So if you look around at the whole world, do you want to try to pursue a solution in the United States that gonna make the poor countries poorer? That doesn't appeal to me. I don't accept the notion that restricting trade can be any part of a progressive agenda. I like to think of myself as a pragmatic progressive. So I think when you worry about wages for ordinary workers in the U.S., which I do worry about, I think you have to look at the tax system in the United States. I think you have to look at public expenditure on education and key services that actually each ordinary people. So I think what Larry Summers is arguing is that there are fiscal measures and policy measures that would really make life better for the working class. I don't think Larry Summers is arguing against the free trade regime, but I think he's smart enough to realize that if you don't do something for ordinary workers in the United States, you may lose the political support for free trade. And that really is an important engine for the whole global growth.
Recorded on: 7/3/07
Does free trade hurt the developed world's middle class?
Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.
No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.
Research by neuroscientists at MIT's Picower Institute for Learning and Memory helps explain how the brain regulates arousal.
The big day has come: You are taking your road test to get your driver's license. As you start your mom's car with a stern-faced evaluator in the passenger seat, you know you'll need to be alert but not so excited that you make mistakes. Even if you are simultaneously sleep-deprived and full of nervous energy, you need your brain to moderate your level of arousal so that you do your best.
A disturbing interview given by a KGB defector in 1984 describes America of today and outlines four stages of mass brainwashing used by the KGB.
- Bezmenov described this process as "a great brainwashing" which has four basic stages.
- The first stage is called "demoralization" which takes from 15 to 20 years to achieve.
- According to the former KGB agent, that is the minimum number of years it takes to re-educate one generation of students that is normally exposed to the ideology of its country.
When these companies compete, in the current system, the people lose.
- When a company reaches the top of the ladder, they typically kick it away so that others cannot climb up on it. The aim? So that another company can't compete.
- When this happens in the pharmaceutical world, certain companies stay at the top of the ladder, through broadly-protected patents, at the cost of everyday people benefitting from increased competition.
- Since companies have worked out how to legally game the system, Amin argues we need to get rid of this "one size fits all" system, which treats product innovation — "tweaks" — the same as product invention.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.