Transcript:No, of course not. You know when . . . when Katrina happened, the first thing I did was call Senator John _______, my dear friend in the Senate who just retired the same year I did. M y first question was, “Do you feel guilty that we’re not there to help?” And he said, “Yeah.” And I said, “Well look, you and I, we have to start a fund to help New Orleans. And we have to get people bigger than us to do that.” And I said, “Why don’t you call Bill Clinton and I’ll call President Bush XLI and see if we can’t put them together the same way they worked on the tsunami.” And he did and I did and we got them together. And President Bush okayed it, and so we got them started. And at one point I asked President Clinton if he might be willing to sponsor out of that fund a prize for the architect/engineering firm that could come up with the best plan to reconstruct New Orleans so it would be waterproof. My theory is simple. If Venice can live in water for 365 days out of the year, New Orleans ought to be able to take a few days too if we worked it out right. And let the locals pick the winning plan and get the whole country behind it. Well he came back with a message that he didn’t find a lot of interest in it in the local community in New Orleans; and so it hasn’t happened. I’m still talking about it in New Orleans. I still think we need to do that. If we don’t have a plan to make New Orleans waterproof, you can build all the levees you want. They’ll break again. Some hurricane will top ‘em and you’ll be faced with the same situation, particularly if water continues to rise. So no I’m not happy. I think we’re watching the slow, you know, deterioration of the coastline of Louisiana. And the pressures of New Orleans are gonna grow unless somebody wakes up and realizes it’s gotta be waterproofed.
Recorded on: 9/11/07
The tangible consequences of global warming.
Transcript: Globally you gotta be concerned about global warming for Christ’s sake. I come from Louisiana. Have you seen the National Geographic maps of Louisiana with three feet of water? My whole district is gone. I come from New Orleans, which just went through Katrina. We have to be concerned with what we’re doing to this planet and take this issue seriously. It doesn’t matter whether we caused it or not. It’s happened. We better take it seriously.
Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.
No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.
Research by neuroscientists at MIT's Picower Institute for Learning and Memory helps explain how the brain regulates arousal.
The big day has come: You are taking your road test to get your driver's license. As you start your mom's car with a stern-faced evaluator in the passenger seat, you know you'll need to be alert but not so excited that you make mistakes. Even if you are simultaneously sleep-deprived and full of nervous energy, you need your brain to moderate your level of arousal so that you do your best.
A disturbing interview given by a KGB defector in 1984 describes America of today and outlines four stages of mass brainwashing used by the KGB.
- Bezmenov described this process as "a great brainwashing" which has four basic stages.
- The first stage is called "demoralization" which takes from 15 to 20 years to achieve.
- According to the former KGB agent, that is the minimum number of years it takes to re-educate one generation of students that is normally exposed to the ideology of its country.
When these companies compete, the people lose.
- When a company reaches the top of the ladder, they typically kick it away so that others cannot climb up on it. The aim? So that another company can't compete.
- When this phenomenon happens in the pharmaceutical world, companies quickly apply for broad protection of their patents, which can last up to 20 years, and fence off research areas for others. The result of this? They stay at the top of the ladder, at the cost of everyday people benefitting from increased competition.
- Since companies have worked out how to legally game the system, Amin argues we need to get rid of this "one size fits all" system, which treats product innovation the same as product invention. Companies should still receive an incentive for coming up with new products, he says, but not 20 years if the product is the result of "tweaking" an existing one.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.