George Kohlrieser on His Fears

Kohlrieser:

The change is too slow. My concern is that change is too slow. I think people see it. They see the need for it. And that’s one thing that we have to speed up the rate of which we are doing things to protect the environment. We need to speed up the processes of innovation so we find new ways of energy creation and absorption and use. What also fears me is people who are not socially bonded. These are the dangerous people. They can do crazy things. And, of course, terrorist are terrorist. Again, if you create a relationship with a terrorist, and this is a controversial idea, people do not naturally kill people. We have terrorists, though, who are hell-bent on killing others and they’re in a tribal process. That is also a great concern to me. So it’s we have to be dealing with security and protection, but you don’t create security while, at the same time, demonizing and creating enemies. We have to build dialog. We have to build a tribalization in which we’re open to other tribes, other thinking. What shocks me and scares me is closed mindsets, people who will not consider another idea. And some of the most dangerous closed mindsets are around religious beliefs. I am right and everybody else is wrong. Now, I grew up with a strong spiritual, religious background, I still am too today. But I know, people in all religions that I have been able to talk to, dialog, learn from. It’s this kind of attitude that we need. And also respecting the idea that people do have needs and that we must allow people to develop those needs. And in the end, it is about sharing. It is about sharing and building a commonality in which we build on the strengths of people. We help people. We lift people up. Muhammad Yunus. This is an incredible story. $27 was what he got, this whole bank started on. We’re talking about $700 billion in this bailout. What could be done with that money? And how do we come back to people? In the end, the world is about people and the well-being of people. And I’m going to a conference very soon on, basically [IB] [a study] on the well-being of countries. How do we look at the well-being of countries? How do we look at how the governments are trying to help people find satisfaction? You know, what’s clear is those who have the most are often the least satisfied and yet they are the most destructive in many ways in the world.

The slow pace of change and closed mindsets are disconcerting to George Kohlrieser.

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Sponsored
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

Brain study finds circuits that may help you keep your cool

Research by neuroscientists at MIT's Picower Institute for Learning and Memory helps explain how the brain regulates arousal.

Photo by CHARLY TRIBALLEAU / AFP/ Getty Images
Mind & Brain

MIT News

The big day has come: You are taking your road test to get your driver's license. As you start your mom's car with a stern-faced evaluator in the passenger seat, you know you'll need to be alert but not so excited that you make mistakes. Even if you are simultaneously sleep-deprived and full of nervous energy, you need your brain to moderate your level of arousal so that you do your best.

Keep reading Show less

34 years ago, a KGB defector chillingly predicted modern America

A disturbing interview given by a KGB defector in 1984 describes America of today and outlines four stages of mass brainwashing used by the KGB.

Politics & Current Affairs
  • Bezmenov described this process as "a great brainwashing" which has four basic stages.
  • The first stage is called "demoralization" which takes from 15 to 20 years to achieve.
  • According to the former KGB agent, that is the minimum number of years it takes to re-educate one generation of students that is normally exposed to the ideology of its country.
Keep reading Show less

How pharmaceutical companies game the patent system

When these companies compete, in the current system, the people lose.

Top Video Splash
  • When a company reaches the top of the ladder, they typically kick it away so that others cannot climb up on it. The aim? So that another company can't compete.
  • When this happens in the pharmaceutical world, certain companies stay at the top of the ladder, through broadly-protected patents, at the cost of everyday people benefitting from increased competition.
  • Since companies have worked out how to legally game the system, Amin argues we need to get rid of this "one size fits all" system, which treats product innovation — "tweaks" — the same as product invention.