Fusion Really Is 20 Years Away

Question: What is the future of how we produce our energy supply? (Submitted by Kaloian Pavlov)

Michio Kaku:  Kaloian, let’s take a look at a timeframe for the future.  Right now there is going to be an energy mix, a battle between different kinds of energy sources that will go on for 10 to 15 years.  Right now, we’re going to have an energy mix because no one white knight can save modern society from the needs of oil and coal.  Let’s face it.  Pound for pound, oil and coal contain more energy in a convenient form than almost any other energy source.  Now I love solar, but I’m a physicist and I know that solar is not quite ready for primetime yet.  However, the cost of solar goes down every year.  Solar is being mass produced.  Solar is being given tax credits and jumpstarts by governments, so we see the cost of solar going down.  I suspect that in about 10 years or so—no one knows precisely when—the rising cost of fossil fuels will intersect with the falling costs of renewable technology, and when these two curves cross that will be a sea change.  At that point it will be economical... economical to go solar.  However, it’s not going to happen anytime soon. 

Now beyond that timeframe when we’re talking now about 2030, 2040 then fusion becomes an option at that point. Fusion is the power of the sun, the possibility of using ordinary seawater to create unlimited amounts of energy due to thermonuclear reactions on the Planet Earth.  Now some people are cynical about that.  They say "Hey, give me a break.  We’ve been there.  We’ve heard the claims.  Every 20 years they say that fusion is 20 years from now.  20 years come, and we’re still no closer to fusion."  There is a difference.  This time we physicists think that we have the technical problems licked.  In California we have the largest laser fusion facility at Livermore National Laboratories, and in France in the year 2019 we expect to get the ITER fusion reactor operational. So it’s projected that by 2030, 2040, by mid-century fusion becomes a viable option. And none too soon, because with the greenhouse effect we begin to realize that the beginning of the century could be quite dangerous.  We’re going to be putting large amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.  However, by 10, 15 years solar becomes just as competitive as fossil fuels in the marketplace and beyond that fusion kicks in. And fusion is clean.

Scientists always say that fusion is 20 years away, but this time the physicist says it’s for real.

How to make a black hole

Here's the science of black holes, from supermassive monsters to ones the size of ping-pong balls.

Videos
  • There's more than one way to make a black hole, says NASA's Michelle Thaller. They're not always formed from dead stars. For example, there are teeny tiny black holes all around us, the result of high-energy cosmic rays slamming into our atmosphere with enough force to cram matter together so densely that no light can escape.
  • CERN is trying to create artificial black holes right now, but don't worry, it's not dangerous. Scientists there are attempting to smash two particles together with such intensity that it creates a black hole that would live for just a millionth of a second.
  • Thaller uses a brilliant analogy involving a rubber sheet, a marble, and an elephant to explain why different black holes have varying densities. Watch and learn!
  • Bonus fact: If the Earth became a black hole, it would be crushed to the size of a ping-pong ball.

Russian reporters discover 101 'tortured' whales jammed in offshore pens

Protected animals are feared to be headed for the black market.

(VL.ru)
Politics & Current Affairs
  • Russian news network discovers 101 black-market whales.
  • Orcas and belugas are seen crammed into tiny pens.
  • Marine parks continue to create a high-price demand for illegal captures.
Keep reading Show less

China’s artificial sun reaches fusion temperature: 100 million degrees

In a breakthrough for nuclear fusion research, scientists at China's Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST) reactor have produced temperatures necessary for nuclear fusion on Earth.

Credit: EAST Team
Surprising Science
  • The EAST reactor was able to heat hydrogen to temperatures exceeding 100 million degrees Celsius.
  • Nuclear fusion could someday provide the planet with a virtually limitless supply of clean energy.
  • Still, scientists have many other obstacles to pass before fusion technology becomes a viable energy source.
Keep reading Show less