from the world's big
Why Humans See More Colors than Dogs, but Fewer than Birds and Insects
“What we perceive as color — what we perceive as light — corresponds to a very narrow band of frequencies, out of an infinite continuum," says Nobel Laureate Frank Wilczek.
Frank Wilczek is an American theoretical physicist, mathematician and a Nobel laureate. He is currently the Herman Feshbach Professor of Physics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Wilczek, along with David Gross and H. David Politzer, was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2004 for their discovery of asymptotic freedom in the theory of the strong interaction. He is on the Scientific Advisory Board for the Future of Life Institute. His new book is titled A Beautiful Question: Finding Nature's Deep Design.
Frank Wilczek: In the nineteenth century with Maxwell’s synthesis of the laws of electricity and magnetism physicists started to realize that what we perceive as light is deeply understood as a kind of disturbance, electric and magnetic fields. That gave us a new concept of the possibilities of perception of light that show us that we’re missing a lot. The electromagnetic equations permit radiation of any wave length and of any frequency – what we perceive as color – what we perceive as light is corresponds to a very narrow band of frequencies out of an infinite continuum. Not only that but even within that band we take three averages. We don’t sample all the different frequencies but just three averages. That’s called trichromatic vision. So for instance in computer displays there are three different kinds of lighting elements used. When you see on your menu the choice of millions of different colors that doesn’t mean different lighting arrangements, lighting possibilities. It means different combinations, different relative intensities of just three. Any perceived color can be synthesized from three basic colors.
Other creatures see less. Dogs, for instance, see only two kinds of colors like color blind people see basically only two kinds of colors. Other creatures see more. Other creatures – many insects and birds see four or five colors. They also sample kinds of light, kinds of electromagnetic radiation that humans don’t see. There’s infrared radiation. There’s ultraviolet radiation. Maxwell’s equations which describe light also describe radio waves and microwaves and x-rays and gamma rays. So all those things are possible forms of vision that human’s natural endowment doesn’t tap into. But it’s out there. On the one hand it’s very important to make concepts visual because it taps into very powerful methods of processing that we have. And on the other hand scientific knowledge of what light is shows us that our natural perception leaves a lot on the table and so it leaves us with the program of doing better with telescopes, microscopes, spectrometers and other kinds of gadgets that I’m developing for everyday life that will allow us to see more colors.
The human perception of color is limited really by the principles of quantum mechanics. It’s interesting to compare the human perception of color to the perception of sound. Our perception of sound in one way is much richer. When you have two pure tones together like a C and a G, a simple chord that’s a fifth. If you hear that you can hear the separate tones even though they’re played together and you hear a chord. You can also sense the separate tones and if one is louder than the other you can continuously judge how their relative intensity. Whereas with colors if you mix two different – if you have two different colors say spectral green and spectral red and mix them what you see is not a chord where you can see the distinct identities preserved but rather an intermediate color. In fact you’ll see something that looks like yellow. The perception of color sort of throws away the detailed resolution, detailed accounting of the different kinds of underlying tones, different kinds of pure frequencies or pure colors that are underlying the perception. Our perception of that kind of mixture is indistinguishable from our perception of a pure spectral yellow such as you’d see in a rainbow.
It’s as if in music when you played a C and a G together instead of hearing a chord you just heard the note E, the intermediate note. On the other hand visual information is much richer in conveying the spatial structure of things. We get a detailed image whereas sound gives much poorer spatial resolution. And there are good physical reasons for those things. Sound waves are relatively slow – oscillate relatively slowly so that mechanical vibrations inside our ear and electrical processes inside our brain can keep up with them and so we can keep that kind of time structure. We can keep track of it. That’s why we do a good job with chords. Whereas the oscillations in electromagnetic radiation are very, very fast. Much faster than any mechanical system can keep up with or that nerve firings can keep up with. So the way we process that is quite different. It’s an all or none process where photons get absorbed and trigger changes in the structure of proteins. And we have three kinds of proteins and three different kinds of cone cells that give us three kinds of average responses. And that’s why you can synthesize any perceived color with just three.
"In the nineteenth century, with Maxwell’s Synthesis of the Laws of Electricity and Magnetism, physicists started to realize that what we perceive as light is deeply understood as a kind of disturbance of electric and magnetic fields." Frank Wilczek says. "That gave us a new concept of the possibilities of perception of light, that show us we’re missing a lot."
In fact, there is a lot to light that we as humans can’t see.
"What we perceive as color — what we perceive as light — corresponds to a very narrow band of frequencies, out of an infinite continuum. Not only that, but within that band we take three averages."
These averages are made up of the three primary colors. These three colors mix and match to make up the rest of our field of vision, which is known as tri-chromatic vision.
"In computer displays, there are three different kinds of lighting elements used." Wilczek explains. "When you see on your menu, the choice of millions of different colors, that doesn’t mean different lighting arrangements or possibilities. It means different combinations, different relative intensities of just three. Any perceived color can be synthesized from three basic colors."
Not all animals have three cones of vision, dogs are known to have only two, while some other animals have more. These animals not only can see more colors than we as humans do, but can "sample" light in different ways than humans, such as infrared and ultra violet light. For now, in our current natural state of being, we can’t see them.
"Our perception of sound, in one way, is much richer." Wilczek says. When a chord is played on an instrument, we are able to differentiate between the notes being played, we hear them as separate notes played at the same time. But when two waves of light, two colors hit each other, such as red and blue, we see them as one beam of light: purple.
"Our perception of that mixture is indistinguishable from a pure spectral yellow such as you’d see in a rainbow. It’s as if in music, when you play a C and a G together, instead of hearing a chord, you just heard the note E."
This has a lot to do with how fast the waves oscillate. Sound waves are relatively slower, allowing our brains to keep up with the way they move, while light waves oscillate faster.
"The way we process that is quite different, it’s an all or none process where photons get absorbed and trigger changes in the structure of proteins. We have three kinds of proteins, and three different kinds of cone cells, that give us three kinds of average responses. And that’s why you can synthesize any perceived color with just three."
Join multiple Tony and Emmy Award-winning actress Judith Light live on Big Think at 2 pm ET on Monday.
A new study looks at what would happen to human language on a long journey to other star systems.
- A new study proposes that language could change dramatically on long space voyages.
- Spacefaring people might lose the ability to understand the people of Earth.
- This scenario is of particular concern for potential "generation ships".
Generation Ships<span style="display:block;position:relative;padding-top:56.25%;" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="a1e6445c7168d293a6da3f9600f534a2"><iframe type="lazy-iframe" data-runner-src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/H2f0Wd3zNj0?rel=0" width="100%" height="auto" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;"></iframe></span>
Many of the most popular apps are about self-improvement.
Emotions are the newest hot commodity, and we can't get enough.
Construction of the $500 billion dollar tech city-state of the future is moving ahead.
- The futuristic megacity Neom is being built in Saudi Arabia.
- The city will be fully automated, leading in health, education and quality of life.
- It will feature an artificial moon, cloud seeding, robotic gladiators and flying taxis.
The Red Sea area where Neom will be built:
Saudi Arabia Plans Futuristic City, "Neom" (Full Promotional Video)<span style="display:block;position:relative;padding-top:56.25%;" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="c646d528d230c1bf66c75422bc4ccf6f"><iframe type="lazy-iframe" data-runner-src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/N53DzL3_BHA?rel=0" width="100%" height="auto" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;"></iframe></span>
Frequent shopping for single items adds to our carbon footprint.
- A new study shows e-commerce sites like Amazon leave larger greenhouse gas footprints than retail stores.
- Ordering online from retail stores has an even smaller footprint than going to the store yourself.
- Greening efforts by major e-commerce sites won't curb wasteful consumer habits. Consolidating online orders can make a difference.
A pile of recycled cardboard sits on the ground at Recology's Recycle Central on January 4, 2018 in San Francisco, California.
Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images<p>A large part of the reason is speed. In a competitive market, pure players use the equation, <em>speed + convenience</em>, to drive adoption. This is especially relevant to the "last mile" GHG footprint: the distance between the distribution center and the consumer.</p><p>Interestingly, the smallest GHG footprint occurs when you order directly from a physical store—even smaller than going there yourself. Pure players, such as Amazon, are the greatest offenders. Variables like geographic location matter; the team looked at shopping in the UK, the US, China, and the Netherlands. </p><p>Sadegh Shahmohammadi, a PhD student at the Netherlands' Radboud University and corresponding author of the paper, <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/26/tech/greenhouse-gas-emissions-retail/index.html" target="_blank">says</a> the above "pattern holds true in countries where people mostly drive. It really depends on the country and consumer behavior there."</p><p>The researchers write that this year-and-a-half long study pushes back on previous research that claims online shopping to be better in terms of GHG footprints.</p><p style="margin-left: 20px;">"They have, however, compared the GHG emissions per shopping event and did not consider the link between the retail channels and the basket size, which leads to a different conclusion than that of the current study."</p><p>Online retail is where convenience trumps environment: people tend to order one item at a time when shopping on pure player sites, whereas they stock up on multiple items when visiting a store. Consumers will sometimes order a number of separate items over the course of a week rather than making one trip to purchase everything they need. </p><p>While greening efforts by online retailers are important, until a shift in consumer attitude changes, the current carbon footprint will be a hard obstacle to overcome. Amazon is trying to have it both ways—carbon-free and convenience addicted—and the math isn't adding up. If you need to order things, do it online, but try to consolidate your purchases as much as possible.</p><p>--</p><p><em>Stay in touch with Derek on <a href="http://www.twitter.com/derekberes" target="_blank">Twitter</a>, <a href="https://www.facebook.com/DerekBeresdotcom" target="_blank">Facebook</a> and <a href="https://derekberes.substack.com/" target="_blank">Substack</a>. His next book is</em> "<em>Hero's Dose: The Case For Psychedelics in Ritual and Therapy."</em></p>