Farnaz Fassihi Reveals How Iraqis Really View American Intervention
Farnaz Fassihi is the deputy bureau chief of Middle East and Africa for The Wall Street Journal and the author of Waiting for An Ordinary Day, a memoir of her four years covering the Iraq war and witnessing the unraveling of life for Iraqi citizens. In May 2006, Fassihi was awarded the prestigious Henry Pringle Lecture Award for her Iraq coverage by Columbia University’s Graduate School of Journalism. Her coverage of the EgyptAir flight 990 crash won the New England News Executive Award as well as a finalist nomination for the Livingston Award.
Question: Is there a consensus on America’s presence in Iraq?
Fassihi: As you say, Iraq is very complicated. It’s not black and white. And, depending on who you talk to, you get different answers. I think the consensus is that the Iraqis were not expecting this and are not happy about the aftermath of the war. Even the Iraqis who were happy that Saddam was toppled are not happy that security fell apart, that the country was dragged through civil war, that 5 million people are now displaced and refugees. I think that the aftermath definitely criticized by most people. But, I think, in terms of whether the Iraqis want the US to stay, whether they want us to leave, what know what should happen from now on really depends on who you speak to.
Question: What are the loudest voices emerging in Iraq?
Fassihi: I think, on the Sunni side, the loudest voices have been the voices of the insurgents and the voices of, you know, Sunnis who are deeply resentful and have even, you know, resorted to violence in order to get their points across, just because of the nature of the attacks. It’s spectacular. It gets a lot of attention. A lot of people die. And, I think, in terms of the Shias, it definitely would be in the voices of the clerics and the voices of Islamic parties that’s been heard because they’ve been strengthened after the US invasion and, you know, most of the parties who are now in charge, the Shia parties, have a very strong Islamic background, you know, the, Muqtada al-Sadr, who’s a cleric and whose father was a renown cleric, is also allowed… somebody who’s prominent and whose voice we often hear.
The loudest voices are the insurgents, Farnaz Fassihi says.
- Bad outcomes get criticized as evidence of bad decisions, but that's not necessarily so.
- Here, poker pro Annie Duke desribes a simple thought experiment that separates decisions from outcomes.
- It is quite possible to make a very good decision that, due to external factors, results in a bad outcome.
Decide to Play Great Poker: A Strategy Guide to No-Limit Texas Hold '’Em
What do the inventions of the future look like?
- Self-sustaining space colonies and unlimited fusion energy would bring humanity to a new point in our evolution.
- Flying cars and robot butlers could be the next paradigm shift in our tech appetite for change.
- Death and consensus reality might soon become obsolete.
If you're lacking confidence and feel like you could benefit from an ego boost, try writing your life story.
In truth, so much of what happens to us in life is random – we are pawns at the mercy of Lady Luck. To take ownership of our experiences and exert a feeling of control over our future, we tell stories about ourselves that weave meaning and continuity into our personal identity.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.